You really don't know the difference between using modern day mathematics to analyse monuments and finding the same mathematics in those monuments, do you DavidK. Alexander Thom understood the difference. If you haven't grasped that maybe you really do need to take that backwards step until you do.

I have already explained Thoms changed attitude to the Aubrey circle dimensions to you, but as usual if it doesn't fit your numbers it's ignored( very scientific) I won't bother to go through that again, you cherry pick what you like. It really doesn't matter, unless you want to be taken seriously that is.

I'm interested in authentic research, wherever it comes from. You don't seem to care as long as the numbers tally, eventually.


cloister