Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanks Jacob

You need to read my book 'Stonehenge the Eclipse' to see where I am coming from and I don't think you have read it. Once the project was completed the next stop was always going to be the GP because of Hugh's work. My driver has and always will be promoting the work of Alexander Thom because his work is on a completely different level and the treatment meted out to him by academia was absolutely shocking.

[www.amazon.co.uk]

The sekhed is obviously a superior unit than Pi within the design of the GP and I learned this from you. It works three dimensionally. So why would they focus on 22/7, they used 256/81 and 22/7 is naturally built into the design of the GP by using the sekhed.


Using 256/81 shows that they used the diameter to relate to the circle so they would have known 22/7. What happens at Stonehenge is that the Aubrey circle works as a Pi manipulation device centred on two versions of Pi 1760/560 and 1632/520. Real pi lies in between but they used 31416/10000.

1760/560 leads to the GP but it is 1760/280 per your analysis. This is why the base will always be divisible by 1760 to produce the cubit in inches, because the GP is designed in feet and inches as Hugh has demonstrated.


This version of Pi (Thom Pi) can be varied without changing the Pi number. It can be 5440 / 1733.333r or 1632/520 keeping the Pi relationship intact. There is a reason for this. The nodal cycle of the Moon is 6800 days or 5440 / 0.8.


Eclipse danger periods occur every 173.333r days so 3 periods every 520 days. The designers of the monuments were very interested in the Eclipse, this is common knowledge.


When this investigation started it was necessary to set a framework out to direct the focus and is my first book and it only looks at Stonehenge. I knew nothing about it or how to predict eclipses but I do now.


This is what the book laid out and it was written with virtually a zero knowledge base. The guy who reviewed it said it was not clear to him what the book was trying to do. He obviously did not read chapter two 'Searching for Clues'

'For clarity, proposals that will be followed up in this book are outlined here, based on a review of Professor Thom's findings.

The first is that they used the foot and the mile as well as the megalithic yard, this is covered in chapter three.

The second is that they developed a set of divine numbers based on their understanding of the natural universe and the mathematical studies they worked on and that these numbers were used to plan an build the monuments to embed spirituality into the designs. This is covered in chapter four.


The third is that they used a simple four season calendar of 91 days per season to provide constant comparable years. This is covered in chapter five.


The fourth is that they developed the modern time system by experimentation at the Greater Cursus and Woodhenge. This is covered in chapter seven.

These proposals are as a result of reviewing Professor Thom's findings.The assumptions are that they were capable of doing all these things as outlined by the professor's work.'


I am still doing this and the initial assumptions have proved to be, in the main, proven at Stonehenge. When I wrote the book it had not been possible to link the imperial system to the one Thom had discovered but just after publishing the relationship surfaced and led to an investigation of the primes within the designs. I had them as 1-13 in the book but had missed the base prime of Thom's system number 17.


Your assumptions of what I am trying to do at the GP are way off beam. my objective is to demonstrate that it is designed against the megalithic yard and that the megalithic yard is expressed via the cubit which was used instead of the megalithic yard. Most probably the reasons for using the cubit outweigh using the megalithic yard just as using the sekhed outweighs the use of 22/7.


It is not possible to do any of the above without using fractional mathematics.


The findings at Stonehenge drive the investigation on this website.


The key is that the cubit x 1.584 = the megalithic yard if 1760 cubits are in the GP base. The GP height is 280 cubits.


1760 and 280 are imperial bases, no question.


You have shown that 1760 is not fixed, different cubits can give a higher figure, eg 20.25 inches and Michell did the same, but the cubits being looked at in the investigation always have 1760 in the base.

So for example working down from the top of the pyramid 20.25 gives a base of 35640 inches and height of 5670 inches. So we are a distance from the base, 101.1818181818r inches to be precise. Jim can explain the importance of these numbers and they are lunar based.

Also working down from the top of the pyramid 20.00 inches gives a base of 35200 inches and height of 5670 inches. So we are a distance from the base, 171.1818181818r inches to be precise. Jim can explain the importance of these numbers as well and they are lunar based.

171.1818181818r - 101.1818181818 = 70 for a reason

'As I see it you, like most, are so wrapped up attempting to prove their use of pi to even investigate let alone comprehend the level of significance of the 5 1/2 seked held by the Ancient Egyptians. '


Not so, well off the mark.


5.5 sekhed is 14/11 x 11/2 = 7 please see above, everyone knows how may days there are in a week.


Do you know what an MOD is? megalithic one day unit and it is 1/7 making 22/7 represent 22 days.

I am following your rules Jacob but coming from a very different angle and I really value what you have achieved and if you publish I will be first in the queue.

the circle builders in the UK were into pi and that is what Thom tells us. This version of Thom pi as 5440 / 1733.333r is my discovery that unlocks the Aubrey circle it is base 17 divided by base 13 and imperial pi is base 11 divided by base 7 the two units are designed exactly the same way and this is a fact.


A 91 day season was suggested in the first book. Eventually it surfaced within the Aubrey design.


1760/560 x 5440/ 1733.333r x 91 = 897.6 Thom's Aubrey circumference. The complexity is quite something, it is an eclipse prediction system based on Pi. the 28 and 26 day lunar cycles are being monitored against 6600 days and 6800 days the nodal cycle.


1.32 x 6800 = 897.60

1.36 x 6600 = 897.60


Dual systems where 1760/560 x 5440/1733.333r represents one solar day. It is astonishing.

3.142857143 x 3.138461538 = 9.863736264 x 91 = 897.60


And at the GP pi squared = 9.87654321.


cheers

dave



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 28-Nov-18 11:49 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 3990 DavidK 11-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 638 molder 11-Jan-18 11:09
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 642 DavidK 11-Jan-18 12:03
Jim Wakefield's Egyptian Pi. 666 DavidK 01-Feb-18 23:58
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 480 DavidK 14-Nov-18 08:34
23040 383 DavidK 22-Nov-18 21:54
Re: 23040 415 molder 22-Nov-18 22:45
Re: 23040 379 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:38
Re: 23040 371 molder 23-Nov-18 02:43
Re: 23040 380 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 13:36
Re: 23040 434 Manu 23-Nov-18 18:46
Re: 23040 389 molder 23-Nov-18 22:44
Re: 23040 394 Manu 23-Nov-18 23:10
Re: 23040 403 DavidK 24-Nov-18 00:11
Re: 23040 386 molder 24-Nov-18 01:30
Re: 23040 397 molder 24-Nov-18 03:14
Re: 23040 454 Manu 24-Nov-18 04:47
Re: 23040 423 DavidK 24-Nov-18 10:02
Re: 23040 402 molder 24-Nov-18 11:04
Re: 23040 395 Manu 24-Nov-18 15:01
Re: 23040 426 Sirfiroth 24-Nov-18 17:16
Re: 23040 398 Manu 24-Nov-18 19:45
Re: 23040 397 DavidK 24-Nov-18 21:08
Re: 23040 401 Manu 24-Nov-18 22:13
Re: 23040 384 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:36
Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 443 hendrik dirker 27-Nov-18 12:10
some thoughts 489 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:56
an anecdote 399 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 10:42
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 448 Sirfiroth 29-Nov-18 22:03
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 534 hendrik dirker 30-Nov-18 07:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 370 molder 24-Nov-18 23:37
Re: More than one value for pi used 389 Manu 25-Nov-18 18:56
Re: More than one value for pi used 406 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 336 Manu 26-Nov-18 14:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 362 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:08
Re: More than one value for pi used 350 Manu 27-Nov-18 11:15
Re: More than one value for pi used 353 molder 27-Nov-18 22:41
Re: More than one value for pi used 363 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 345 DavidK 27-Nov-18 23:35
Re: More than one value for pi used 330 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:50
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 449 M. J. Thomas 28-Nov-18 11:28
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 350 molder 01-Dec-18 12:55
Re: More than one value for pi used 334 molder 26-Nov-18 11:47
Re: More than one value for pi used 348 Manu 26-Nov-18 12:11
Re: 23040 146 DavidK 24-Dec-19 00:52
Re: 23040 163 Sirfiroth 26-Dec-19 14:30
Re: 23040 117 DavidK 27-Dec-19 19:05
Re: 23040 210 Sirfiroth 27-Dec-19 21:04
Earth depicted in the sky 459 hendrik dirker 24-Nov-18 17:28
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 346 molder 24-Nov-18 23:21
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 451 DavidK 25-Nov-18 08:35
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 362 DavidK 26-Nov-18 11:31
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 478 hendrik dirker 26-Nov-18 17:23
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 343 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:42
I dunno 381 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:22
Re: 23040 390 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:41
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 398 DavidK 23-Nov-18 09:53
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 334 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 14:06
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 371 DavidK 26-Nov-18 15:24
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 376 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 21:13
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 342 DavidK 27-Nov-18 09:16
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 483 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 01:10
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 354 DavidK 28-Nov-18 11:39
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 387 Manu 28-Nov-18 14:25
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 360 DavidK 28-Nov-18 16:14
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 364 Manu 28-Nov-18 17:20
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 345 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 00:52
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 380 Manu 30-Nov-18 02:12
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 351 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 17:04
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 360 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:02
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 150 thinkitover 24-Dec-19 16:07
Really loving Jim's 23040 and root 5 406 DavidK 23-Nov-18 16:29
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 114 DavidK 27-Dec-19 19:17
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 585 DavidK 19-Mar-18 09:43
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 538 DavidK 08-May-18 10:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 476 DavidK 12-Nov-18 17:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 356 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:25
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 376 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 17:12
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 511 DavidK 30-Nov-18 15:28
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 392 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 16:52
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 362 molder 30-Nov-18 22:22
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 392 DavidK 30-Nov-18 22:45
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge 432 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 08:13
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 388 DavidK 01-Dec-18 10:49
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 335 molder 01-Dec-18 12:28
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 357 Sirfiroth 01-Dec-18 14:25
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 511 rodz111 01-Dec-18 18:36
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 373 DavidK 01-Dec-18 20:53
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 405 Sirfiroth 02-Dec-18 20:09
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 342 DavidK 02-Dec-18 22:55
Really that dense? 341 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 02:29
Re: Really that dense? 343 rodz111 03-Dec-18 03:40
Re: Really that dense? 340 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 14:37
Re: Really that dense? 362 rodz111 04-Dec-18 03:43
Re: Really that dense? 407 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 05:06
Re: Really that dense? 360 DavidK 04-Dec-18 10:13
Re: Really that dense? 348 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 15:01
Re: Really that dense? 337 DavidK 04-Dec-18 16:17
Re: Really that dense? 353 molder 04-Dec-18 10:27
Re: Really that dense? 333 DavidK 04-Dec-18 13:06
Re: Really that dense? 404 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 16:42
Re: Really that dense? 379 rodz111 04-Dec-18 21:38
Re: Really that dense? 326 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 23:38
Re: Really that dense? 354 DavidK 05-Dec-18 00:06
Re: Really that dense? 327 rodz111 05-Dec-18 16:32
Re: Really that dense? 340 rodz111 09-Dec-18 04:17
Re: Really that dense? 420 DavidK 03-Dec-18 09:19
Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 398 molder 05-Dec-18 21:40
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 377 DavidK 05-Dec-18 23:01
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 425 cloister 05-Dec-18 23:38
uhmm... every day? 356 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 06:42
Re: uhmmm... every day? 365 cloister 06-Dec-18 08:37
Re: uhmmm... every day? 409 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 09:06
Re: uhmmm... every day? 367 cloister 06-Dec-18 11:25
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 436 DavidK 06-Dec-18 10:04
Quite Simply! 381 Sirfiroth 06-Dec-18 13:55
Re: Quite Simply! 398 DUNE 07-Dec-18 11:24
Great Assumption! 408 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 14:44
Re: Great Assumption! 396 DUNE 07-Dec-18 16:49
Re: Great Assumption! 432 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 17:52
Re: Great Assumption! 338 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 02:28
Re: Great Assumption! 301 DUNE 08-Dec-18 09:05
Re: Great Assumption! 342 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 15:57
Re: Great Assumption! 339 DUNE 08-Dec-18 17:51
Re: Quite Simply! 384 DavidK 07-Dec-18 14:57
Re: Quite Simply! 370 DavidK 07-Dec-18 20:27
Re: Quite Simply! 367 DUNE 07-Dec-18 22:26
Re: Quite Simply! 380 DavidK 07-Dec-18 22:37
a load of numbers under scrtutiny 514 hendrik dirker 12-Dec-18 13:30
Papyrus of Pffft.... 415 cloister 12-Dec-18 16:01
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 365 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 12:16
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 329 cloister 14-Dec-18 14:52
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 341 Dr. Troglodyte 14-Dec-18 15:30
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 360 hendrik dirker 15-Dec-18 06:50
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 360 DavidK 15-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 369 cloister 15-Dec-18 21:27
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 422 rodz111 15-Dec-18 08:54
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 359 molder 18-Dec-18 22:18
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 392 DavidK 12-Dec-18 20:16
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 396 DUNE 12-Dec-18 21:51
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 373 cloister 12-Dec-18 22:59
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 357 gjb 13-Dec-18 01:53
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 413 DavidK 13-Dec-18 10:35
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 338 cloister 13-Dec-18 12:22
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 326 DavidK 13-Dec-18 12:39
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 336 cloister 13-Dec-18 13:04
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 377 gjb 13-Dec-18 12:54
440 & 280 413 hendrik dirker 13-Dec-18 06:51
Re: 440 & 280 391 hendrik dirker 21-Dec-18 11:51
Re:-Stop the World for a word... 377 rodz111 13-Dec-18 19:57
Re: Re:-Stop the World for a word... 419 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 06:04
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 389 molder 08-Dec-18 05:10
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 437 DavidK 08-Dec-18 09:15
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 426 DUNE 08-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 433 DavidK 09-Dec-18 09:53
Link to 277.777r at the GP 400 DavidK 25-Feb-19 19:37
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 352 DavidK 04-Mar-19 21:42
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP and 1111.1111r 309 DavidK 22-Mar-19 20:58
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 353 rodz111 23-Mar-19 02:27
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 304 DavidK 23-Mar-19 14:44
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 275 rodz111 24-Mar-19 09:28
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 313 Thanos5150 23-Mar-19 15:03
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 304 rodz111 24-Mar-19 01:56
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 312 Thanos5150 24-Mar-19 03:32
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 247 rodz111 24-Mar-19 06:14
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 270 DavidK 24-Mar-19 13:35
closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 245 DavidK 24-Mar-19 16:33
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 255 rodz111 24-Mar-19 20:00
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 245 DavidK 25-Mar-19 08:18
Stanton Drew 299 molder 27-Mar-19 22:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 304 DavidK 28-Mar-19 07:37
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 277 molder 29-Mar-19 10:33
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 265 DUNE 29-Mar-19 11:16
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 281 DavidK 29-Mar-19 13:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 311 molder 29-Mar-19 20:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.