Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanks Jacob

You need to read my book 'Stonehenge the Eclipse' to see where I am coming from and I don't think you have read it. Once the project was completed the next stop was always going to be the GP because of Hugh's work. My driver has and always will be promoting the work of Alexander Thom because his work is on a completely different level and the treatment meted out to him by academia was absolutely shocking.

[www.amazon.co.uk]

The sekhed is obviously a superior unit than Pi within the design of the GP and I learned this from you. It works three dimensionally. So why would they focus on 22/7, they used 256/81 and 22/7 is naturally built into the design of the GP by using the sekhed.


Using 256/81 shows that they used the diameter to relate to the circle so they would have known 22/7. What happens at Stonehenge is that the Aubrey circle works as a Pi manipulation device centred on two versions of Pi 1760/560 and 1632/520. Real pi lies in between but they used 31416/10000.

1760/560 leads to the GP but it is 1760/280 per your analysis. This is why the base will always be divisible by 1760 to produce the cubit in inches, because the GP is designed in feet and inches as Hugh has demonstrated.


This version of Pi (Thom Pi) can be varied without changing the Pi number. It can be 5440 / 1733.333r or 1632/520 keeping the Pi relationship intact. There is a reason for this. The nodal cycle of the Moon is 6800 days or 5440 / 0.8.


Eclipse danger periods occur every 173.333r days so 3 periods every 520 days. The designers of the monuments were very interested in the Eclipse, this is common knowledge.


When this investigation started it was necessary to set a framework out to direct the focus and is my first book and it only looks at Stonehenge. I knew nothing about it or how to predict eclipses but I do now.


This is what the book laid out and it was written with virtually a zero knowledge base. The guy who reviewed it said it was not clear to him what the book was trying to do. He obviously did not read chapter two 'Searching for Clues'

'For clarity, proposals that will be followed up in this book are outlined here, based on a review of Professor Thom's findings.

The first is that they used the foot and the mile as well as the megalithic yard, this is covered in chapter three.

The second is that they developed a set of divine numbers based on their understanding of the natural universe and the mathematical studies they worked on and that these numbers were used to plan an build the monuments to embed spirituality into the designs. This is covered in chapter four.


The third is that they used a simple four season calendar of 91 days per season to provide constant comparable years. This is covered in chapter five.


The fourth is that they developed the modern time system by experimentation at the Greater Cursus and Woodhenge. This is covered in chapter seven.

These proposals are as a result of reviewing Professor Thom's findings.The assumptions are that they were capable of doing all these things as outlined by the professor's work.'


I am still doing this and the initial assumptions have proved to be, in the main, proven at Stonehenge. When I wrote the book it had not been possible to link the imperial system to the one Thom had discovered but just after publishing the relationship surfaced and led to an investigation of the primes within the designs. I had them as 1-13 in the book but had missed the base prime of Thom's system number 17.


Your assumptions of what I am trying to do at the GP are way off beam. my objective is to demonstrate that it is designed against the megalithic yard and that the megalithic yard is expressed via the cubit which was used instead of the megalithic yard. Most probably the reasons for using the cubit outweigh using the megalithic yard just as using the sekhed outweighs the use of 22/7.


It is not possible to do any of the above without using fractional mathematics.


The findings at Stonehenge drive the investigation on this website.


The key is that the cubit x 1.584 = the megalithic yard if 1760 cubits are in the GP base. The GP height is 280 cubits.


1760 and 280 are imperial bases, no question.


You have shown that 1760 is not fixed, different cubits can give a higher figure, eg 20.25 inches and Michell did the same, but the cubits being looked at in the investigation always have 1760 in the base.

So for example working down from the top of the pyramid 20.25 gives a base of 35640 inches and height of 5670 inches. So we are a distance from the base, 101.1818181818r inches to be precise. Jim can explain the importance of these numbers and they are lunar based.

Also working down from the top of the pyramid 20.00 inches gives a base of 35200 inches and height of 5670 inches. So we are a distance from the base, 171.1818181818r inches to be precise. Jim can explain the importance of these numbers as well and they are lunar based.

171.1818181818r - 101.1818181818 = 70 for a reason

'As I see it you, like most, are so wrapped up attempting to prove their use of pi to even investigate let alone comprehend the level of significance of the 5 1/2 seked held by the Ancient Egyptians. '


Not so, well off the mark.


5.5 sekhed is 14/11 x 11/2 = 7 please see above, everyone knows how may days there are in a week.


Do you know what an MOD is? megalithic one day unit and it is 1/7 making 22/7 represent 22 days.

I am following your rules Jacob but coming from a very different angle and I really value what you have achieved and if you publish I will be first in the queue.

the circle builders in the UK were into pi and that is what Thom tells us. This version of Thom pi as 5440 / 1733.333r is my discovery that unlocks the Aubrey circle it is base 17 divided by base 13 and imperial pi is base 11 divided by base 7 the two units are designed exactly the same way and this is a fact.


A 91 day season was suggested in the first book. Eventually it surfaced within the Aubrey design.


1760/560 x 5440/ 1733.333r x 91 = 897.6 Thom's Aubrey circumference. The complexity is quite something, it is an eclipse prediction system based on Pi. the 28 and 26 day lunar cycles are being monitored against 6600 days and 6800 days the nodal cycle.


1.32 x 6800 = 897.60

1.36 x 6600 = 897.60


Dual systems where 1760/560 x 5440/1733.333r represents one solar day. It is astonishing.

3.142857143 x 3.138461538 = 9.863736264 x 91 = 897.60


And at the GP pi squared = 9.87654321.


cheers

dave



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 28-Nov-18 11:49 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 3887 DavidK 11-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 617 molder 11-Jan-18 11:09
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 619 DavidK 11-Jan-18 12:03
Jim Wakefield's Egyptian Pi. 647 DavidK 01-Feb-18 23:58
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 458 DavidK 14-Nov-18 08:34
23040 364 DavidK 22-Nov-18 21:54
Re: 23040 398 molder 22-Nov-18 22:45
Re: 23040 360 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:38
Re: 23040 355 molder 23-Nov-18 02:43
Re: 23040 362 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 13:36
Re: 23040 413 Manu 23-Nov-18 18:46
Re: 23040 371 molder 23-Nov-18 22:44
Re: 23040 376 Manu 23-Nov-18 23:10
Re: 23040 382 DavidK 24-Nov-18 00:11
Re: 23040 365 molder 24-Nov-18 01:30
Re: 23040 373 molder 24-Nov-18 03:14
Re: 23040 432 Manu 24-Nov-18 04:47
Re: 23040 399 DavidK 24-Nov-18 10:02
Re: 23040 386 molder 24-Nov-18 11:04
Re: 23040 374 Manu 24-Nov-18 15:01
Re: 23040 390 Sirfiroth 24-Nov-18 17:16
Re: 23040 378 Manu 24-Nov-18 19:45
Re: 23040 379 DavidK 24-Nov-18 21:08
Re: 23040 379 Manu 24-Nov-18 22:13
Re: 23040 365 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:36
Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 418 hendrik dirker 27-Nov-18 12:10
some thoughts 430 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:56
an anecdote 379 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 10:42
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 426 Sirfiroth 29-Nov-18 22:03
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 470 hendrik dirker 30-Nov-18 07:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 352 molder 24-Nov-18 23:37
Re: More than one value for pi used 373 Manu 25-Nov-18 18:56
Re: More than one value for pi used 384 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 317 Manu 26-Nov-18 14:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 348 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:08
Re: More than one value for pi used 330 Manu 27-Nov-18 11:15
Re: More than one value for pi used 335 molder 27-Nov-18 22:41
Re: More than one value for pi used 345 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 328 DavidK 27-Nov-18 23:35
Re: More than one value for pi used 314 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:50
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 427 M. J. Thomas 28-Nov-18 11:28
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 331 molder 01-Dec-18 12:55
Re: More than one value for pi used 317 molder 26-Nov-18 11:47
Re: More than one value for pi used 333 Manu 26-Nov-18 12:11
Re: 23040 129 DavidK 24-Dec-19 00:52
Re: 23040 147 Sirfiroth 26-Dec-19 14:30
Re: 23040 99 DavidK 27-Dec-19 19:05
Re: 23040 191 Sirfiroth 27-Dec-19 21:04
Earth depicted in the sky 439 hendrik dirker 24-Nov-18 17:28
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 329 molder 24-Nov-18 23:21
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 406 DavidK 25-Nov-18 08:35
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 343 DavidK 26-Nov-18 11:31
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 458 hendrik dirker 26-Nov-18 17:23
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 326 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:42
I dunno 363 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:22
Re: 23040 369 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:41
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 381 DavidK 23-Nov-18 09:53
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 315 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 14:06
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 354 DavidK 26-Nov-18 15:24
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 357 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 21:13
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 323 DavidK 27-Nov-18 09:16
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 456 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 01:10
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 334 DavidK 28-Nov-18 11:39
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 361 Manu 28-Nov-18 14:25
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 339 DavidK 28-Nov-18 16:14
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 340 Manu 28-Nov-18 17:20
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 326 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 00:52
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 362 Manu 30-Nov-18 02:12
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 336 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 17:04
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 339 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:02
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 134 thinkitover 24-Dec-19 16:07
Really loving Jim's 23040 and root 5 386 DavidK 23-Nov-18 16:29
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 100 DavidK 27-Dec-19 19:17
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 566 DavidK 19-Mar-18 09:43
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 522 DavidK 08-May-18 10:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 455 DavidK 12-Nov-18 17:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 337 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:25
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 360 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 17:12
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 454 DavidK 30-Nov-18 15:28
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 370 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 16:52
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 343 molder 30-Nov-18 22:22
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 373 DavidK 30-Nov-18 22:45
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge 410 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 08:13
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 373 DavidK 01-Dec-18 10:49
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 321 molder 01-Dec-18 12:28
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 342 Sirfiroth 01-Dec-18 14:25
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 477 rodz111 01-Dec-18 18:36
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 353 DavidK 01-Dec-18 20:53
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 388 Sirfiroth 02-Dec-18 20:09
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 322 DavidK 02-Dec-18 22:55
Really that dense? 320 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 02:29
Re: Really that dense? 324 rodz111 03-Dec-18 03:40
Re: Really that dense? 326 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 14:37
Re: Really that dense? 345 rodz111 04-Dec-18 03:43
Re: Really that dense? 383 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 05:06
Re: Really that dense? 326 DavidK 04-Dec-18 10:13
Re: Really that dense? 333 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 15:01
Re: Really that dense? 317 DavidK 04-Dec-18 16:17
Re: Really that dense? 336 molder 04-Dec-18 10:27
Re: Really that dense? 317 DavidK 04-Dec-18 13:06
Re: Really that dense? 383 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 16:42
Re: Really that dense? 341 rodz111 04-Dec-18 21:38
Re: Really that dense? 309 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 23:38
Re: Really that dense? 336 DavidK 05-Dec-18 00:06
Re: Really that dense? 311 rodz111 05-Dec-18 16:32
Re: Really that dense? 321 rodz111 09-Dec-18 04:17
Re: Really that dense? 399 DavidK 03-Dec-18 09:19
Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 380 molder 05-Dec-18 21:40
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 359 DavidK 05-Dec-18 23:01
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 404 cloister 05-Dec-18 23:38
uhmm... every day? 341 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 06:42
Re: uhmmm... every day? 340 cloister 06-Dec-18 08:37
Re: uhmmm... every day? 391 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 09:06
Re: uhmmm... every day? 345 cloister 06-Dec-18 11:25
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 414 DavidK 06-Dec-18 10:04
Quite Simply! 365 Sirfiroth 06-Dec-18 13:55
Re: Quite Simply! 381 DUNE 07-Dec-18 11:24
Great Assumption! 387 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 14:44
Re: Great Assumption! 379 DUNE 07-Dec-18 16:49
Re: Great Assumption! 415 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 17:52
Re: Great Assumption! 322 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 02:28
Re: Great Assumption! 280 DUNE 08-Dec-18 09:05
Re: Great Assumption! 324 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 15:57
Re: Great Assumption! 324 DUNE 08-Dec-18 17:51
Re: Quite Simply! 366 DavidK 07-Dec-18 14:57
Re: Quite Simply! 349 DavidK 07-Dec-18 20:27
Re: Quite Simply! 352 DUNE 07-Dec-18 22:26
Re: Quite Simply! 360 DavidK 07-Dec-18 22:37
a load of numbers under scrtutiny 487 hendrik dirker 12-Dec-18 13:30
Papyrus of Pffft.... 391 cloister 12-Dec-18 16:01
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 344 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 12:16
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 314 cloister 14-Dec-18 14:52
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 320 Dr. Troglodyte 14-Dec-18 15:30
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 335 hendrik dirker 15-Dec-18 06:50
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 341 DavidK 15-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 353 cloister 15-Dec-18 21:27
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 402 rodz111 15-Dec-18 08:54
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 340 molder 18-Dec-18 22:18
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 372 DavidK 12-Dec-18 20:16
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 376 DUNE 12-Dec-18 21:51
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 354 cloister 12-Dec-18 22:59
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 336 gjb 13-Dec-18 01:53
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 390 DavidK 13-Dec-18 10:35
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 322 cloister 13-Dec-18 12:22
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 309 DavidK 13-Dec-18 12:39
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 315 cloister 13-Dec-18 13:04
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 354 gjb 13-Dec-18 12:54
440 & 280 390 hendrik dirker 13-Dec-18 06:51
Re: 440 & 280 366 hendrik dirker 21-Dec-18 11:51
Re:-Stop the World for a word... 360 rodz111 13-Dec-18 19:57
Re: Re:-Stop the World for a word... 403 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 06:04
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 345 molder 08-Dec-18 05:10
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 416 DavidK 08-Dec-18 09:15
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 405 DUNE 08-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 416 DavidK 09-Dec-18 09:53
Link to 277.777r at the GP 375 DavidK 25-Feb-19 19:37
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 330 DavidK 04-Mar-19 21:42
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP and 1111.1111r 295 DavidK 22-Mar-19 20:58
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 317 rodz111 23-Mar-19 02:27
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 285 DavidK 23-Mar-19 14:44
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 255 rodz111 24-Mar-19 09:28
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 292 Thanos5150 23-Mar-19 15:03
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 279 rodz111 24-Mar-19 01:56
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 292 Thanos5150 24-Mar-19 03:32
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 230 rodz111 24-Mar-19 06:14
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 249 DavidK 24-Mar-19 13:35
closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 230 DavidK 24-Mar-19 16:33
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 218 rodz111 24-Mar-19 20:00
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 228 DavidK 25-Mar-19 08:18
Stanton Drew 277 molder 27-Mar-19 22:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 284 DavidK 28-Mar-19 07:37
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 258 molder 29-Mar-19 10:33
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 244 DUNE 29-Mar-19 11:16
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 266 DavidK 29-Mar-19 13:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 290 molder 29-Mar-19 20:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.