Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Jim, the orbit differential...look
How does an inscribed circle divide the surface of a square?
Almost exactly into 11/14 and 3/14. These are the absolute ratios which add up to one.
Proof: 12 - 0.25π = 0.2146
What is π in this model?
11/14 : 1/4 = 22/7. This is Great Pyramid Pi and I hope you can see now why no pyramid architect enshrining 11/14 needed to know it.
Now take the relative ratios:
11/3 = 3.66
3/11 = 0.273
Do you now see where the pyramid angle comes from?
35 days/ 27.5 days = 14/11 = 1.2727 = 51.84 degrees
The relative ratios: The first is David's favorite number. It is the Earth orbit number divided by 100
The second is the true sidereal period of the Moon divided by 100.
Why would Earth and Moon periods conform to this geometry? Because the kinetic aspect of the total orbit energy of the Earth-Moon-Sun system divides up under this mathematical constraint. This is a system dictated by gravitational fields after all and gravity decays proportional to 1/r2. This means you can model the force geometrically with squares (as did Galileo with his Law of Odd Numbers) and orbit energy with surface. Why is it not a perfect model? Because the orbits are ever so slightly elliptical.
How does an inscribed circle divide the surface of a square?
Almost exactly into 11/14 and 3/14. These are the absolute ratios which add up to one.
Proof: 12 - 0.25π = 0.2146
What is π in this model?
11/14 : 1/4 = 22/7. This is Great Pyramid Pi and I hope you can see now why no pyramid architect enshrining 11/14 needed to know it.
Now take the relative ratios:
11/3 = 3.66
3/11 = 0.273
Do you now see where the pyramid angle comes from?
35 days/ 27.5 days = 14/11 = 1.2727 = 51.84 degrees
The relative ratios: The first is David's favorite number. It is the Earth orbit number divided by 100
The second is the true sidereal period of the Moon divided by 100.
Why would Earth and Moon periods conform to this geometry? Because the kinetic aspect of the total orbit energy of the Earth-Moon-Sun system divides up under this mathematical constraint. This is a system dictated by gravitational fields after all and gravity decays proportional to 1/r2. This means you can model the force geometrically with squares (as did Galileo with his Law of Odd Numbers) and orbit energy with surface. Why is it not a perfect model? Because the orbits are ever so slightly elliptical.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.