Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You misunderstand.
>
> I'll think about any hypothesis and especially
> those that don't assume the ancients were stupid
> and crazy. This means I often find ideas that
> support or contradict those hypotheses. I'll often
> post to provide support but am far less likely to
> cite contradictory ideas.
>
> I like Scott Creighton's thinking but am less
> friendly to each of his hypotheses.
>
> You may not realize this but I often come up with
> things that support Egyptological beliefs but you
> aren't going to see me post them unless one
> becomes relevant. Egyptologists are wrong about
> everything but this doesn't mean there's no
> support for any of their ideas.
. . . which torpedoes any suggestion of your having the judgement required.
M.
-------------------------------------------------------
> You misunderstand.
>
> I'll think about any hypothesis and especially
> those that don't assume the ancients were stupid
> and crazy. This means I often find ideas that
> support or contradict those hypotheses. I'll often
> post to provide support but am far less likely to
> cite contradictory ideas.
>
> I like Scott Creighton's thinking but am less
> friendly to each of his hypotheses.
>
> You may not realize this but I often come up with
> things that support Egyptological beliefs but you
> aren't going to see me post them unless one
> becomes relevant. Egyptologists are wrong about
> everything but this doesn't mean there's no
> support for any of their ideas.
. . . which torpedoes any suggestion of your having the judgement required.
M.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.