theoferrum Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scott, obviously the Egyptologists are out to
> lunch by rejecting the obvious advanced tech. but
> you revisionists are also out yo lunch when it
> comes to anomalous artifacts that destroy manmade
> dating methods in your obdcession to prove a 16K
> BC date when all the facts support the 3K BC date.
> Further, as Dunn points out, the Pyramid
> Complexes cost trillions and would not have been
> built without tangible benefits and those benefits
> must agree with the context - just because you
> don't agree doesn't mean there isn't an
> explanation that fits all these criteria and YOU
> need to rethink what this is. Thus, how do you
> explain the funeral barges that have been found at
> these sites? To put it in perspective - would you
> expect to find coffins, or a graveyard at a hydro
> electric or nuclear power plant? THAT is what you
> have in Egypt and there is a logical explanation
> for this which all you revisionists ignore...

Which is?

M.