eyeofhorus33 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scott
>
> I did - I quoted from it. You claim in your reply
> that those inconvenient OK pyramids and their PTs
> which render your idea implausible are not part of
> "Project Osiris", which - as I restate - suggests
> that you are somehow privy to the grand designs of
> the pyramid builders.
>
> Perhaps you should have read my post more
> carefully.
>
> ETA: I went so far as even wrioting the words:
> "This is how you replied" and then quoting your
> reply to the poster in a text box.
>
> Hilarious! On form.

Hello EoH,

Perhaps I should have been more blunt.

Perhaps you should have read my reply PROPERLY, to wit:

Quote

SC: "The POINT and the FACT here is that the PTs tell us clearly and unequivocally that the “Pyramid is Osiris”. They hint also that the body was cut into several parts. Plutarch puts a number to those parts – 14. Diodorus says 16. THAT is my contention right there – in those TEXTS..."

Hope that clarifies it for you.

SC