Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Where (if anywhere) does he justify “bull
> bones”? Seeing as how he claims the status of
> FACT for them.
The first bone fragment Belzoni and Pieri found, "having rummaging through the rubbish inside the sarcophagus", they thought belonged to a human. It was only upon more searching they found several other fragments. They later sent these to London of which all Belzoni says of it is that they "proved to be the bones of a bull".
-------------------------------------------------------
> Where (if anywhere) does he justify “bull
> bones”? Seeing as how he claims the status of
> FACT for them.
The first bone fragment Belzoni and Pieri found, "having rummaging through the rubbish inside the sarcophagus", they thought belonged to a human. It was only upon more searching they found several other fragments. They later sent these to London of which all Belzoni says of it is that they "proved to be the bones of a bull".
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.