I see M Stower has replied to this (perhaps inadvertently but he is smarter than that) but it was obviously directed to me.

Scott Creighton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Suggest you re-read what I wrote.

I have read your article thoroughly a least twice and obviously including some of your sources. Also I briefly read some of the massive load of BS in your argument with Charly.

Why would I read the trash again?

I cite the
> Coptic-Egyptian tradition as cited by al-Masoudi.

No you cherry picked a portion without citing the components that completely undermine and destroy your fantasy. It your source was an Arabic restatement of a Coptic history article written in 225AD.

You choose to delude ignorant folks, who seek fantasy entertainment, in the hope of some sort of personal gain. Clearly facts and truth do not matter to you.


> Suggest also that you read where the al-Masoudi
> Coptic-Egyptian tradition ends.

If you are suggesting that the portion I cited (only a fraction of the stuff that contradicts your case) was not part of the original Coptic document Masoudi replicated. Then you are here deflecting, avoiding it and being intentionally intellectually dishonest.

I posted a copy of your source, so that any interested party who would even consider swallowing your codswallop, can read it and confirm for themselves. But, I doubt many are interested in facts, just a reason to chat and fantasise.
>
> Your screaming "fraud" and "Con man" at me gives
> me great heart. For it shows me that I am surely
> doing something right.
>

To be fair, I can sort of understand the "screaming" part.

It was infuriating e.g. :

-reading you claim to Charly they never were tombs (not possible), then insist the very purpose included incorporating the actual bodies of ancestors of a fantasy unattested, never existed folklore pre history king with Semitic name/genealogy. One who had dreams, had them interpreted, consulted astrologers, about a flood and the timing given for such "flood" coincides roughly to biblical timeframes and not your fantasy ice age speculation.

- reading your challenge to Charly about the accomplishment of Snefru ( I think there is some genuine grounds for that) but then rely on a spurious folklore fantasy document you deviously call "the Coptic-Egyptian texts" in which the fantasy king Surid is said to have built all the pyramids in a 65 year time frame! Hypocrite !

- Many more .....I can't bare to remember or look them up.

> Your screaming "fraud" and "Con man" at me gives
> me great heart. For it shows me that I am surely
> doing something right.

However this statement ought make it clear to all that you consider it 'a badge of honour' and achievement to be dishonest and deceive! Willing to do or write anything that causes reaction and attention to you and your insane fantasies!

You have every right to post your views (perhaps more than I). However I hope I see the day here where you are reduced to a Cladking like figure of amusement , who finds it necessary to start threads , with although lots of curious humour seeking views but very few replies, and then talk volumes of BS! to yourself!

Thanks for nothin'!