charly Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Ellison Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > charly Wrote:
> >
> > > If by great pyramids you mean those of the
> 4th
> > > dyn, they are just another step in pyramid
> > > evolution.
> > > The Medum pyramid complex is the link between
> > the
> > > step pyramid complex and the "true" pyramid
> > > complex.
> > > The pyramid of Medum was originally a step
> > pyramid
> > > but the other parts of the complex were
> > something
> > > new, a blueprint if you like for all that
> > followed
> > > untill the end of the OK; cult pyramid
> (first
> > one
> > > ever, but a stepped one; only one of it's
> kind
> > ),
> > > funerary chapel (evolved into temple),
> causway,
> > > valley temple.
> > > Don't forget that this step pyramid was
> > converted
> > > into a "true" pyramid.
> >
> > And so the story (hypothesis) goes...
> > The point is, how do you prove all of the
> above?
> > How can it be a "statement of fact".
> > How does the above hypothesis carry more weight
> > than another competing hypothesis?
>
> Please clarify what you actually mean; which part
> of the above isn't a fact that needs to be
> proven?
> What would "another competing hypothesis" be?

It's only a fact if it can be proven.
What is your proof?
Simple question.

A competing hypothesis would be for example Chris Dunn's power plant hypothesis.
Which is presented as an unproven hypothesis and no more.
Remaining an unproven hypothesis until proven.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06-Jan-18 21:59 by Jon Ellison.