Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Jim wrote:
<Look at the figure for lbs again it's a double cube 'it amounts to an Av/Lb. total of 62.25 Lbs' / 2 = 31.125 and cube root = 3.14559.
Pi cubed = 31.00627 x 2 = 62.0125>
Hi Jim,
Careful with those calculations, they might get you into Hot Water as the graphs indicate in the Engineer's Toolbox will attest.
[www.engineeringtoolbox.com]
I miscalculated the density of a cubic Ft. of water and just now corrected the value to 62.5 Lbs. Let's see, your calculation would give a density of Water at around 96*F, according to this chart's increments. Nice temp. for hot tubing this time of year anyhow. :) Just thought I would add to this post now that the figure of 1/2 62.5 at. 31.25 cube rt. = 3.149802625, still makes for an interesting Pi value very near to that of 3.15 value that Jacob uses quite often in his Polar Radius calculations derived from J.Michell's Canonical Model.
Best regards,
Stephen
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03-Jan-18 13:29 by magisterchessmutt.
<Look at the figure for lbs again it's a double cube 'it amounts to an Av/Lb. total of 62.25 Lbs' / 2 = 31.125 and cube root = 3.14559.
Pi cubed = 31.00627 x 2 = 62.0125>
Hi Jim,
Careful with those calculations, they might get you into Hot Water as the graphs indicate in the Engineer's Toolbox will attest.
[www.engineeringtoolbox.com]
I miscalculated the density of a cubic Ft. of water and just now corrected the value to 62.5 Lbs. Let's see, your calculation would give a density of Water at around 96*F, according to this chart's increments. Nice temp. for hot tubing this time of year anyhow. :) Just thought I would add to this post now that the figure of 1/2 62.5 at. 31.25 cube rt. = 3.149802625, still makes for an interesting Pi value very near to that of 3.15 value that Jacob uses quite often in his Polar Radius calculations derived from J.Michell's Canonical Model.
Best regards,
Stephen
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03-Jan-18 13:29 by magisterchessmutt.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.