Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Stephen

you say ' It's one thing for someone like John Neal to cite the ratio of an Assyrian Ft. to an Imperial Ft. as 21/20, and another thing entirely to explain why and how this came about. ----- It can't be done through simple linear measurement analysis. One thing I do know, is that what we call the Imperial Metric system, and Megalithic Metric systems, are co-joined at the Vesica hip, in this evolutionary prerecorded history process.'

copy that.

i nave come into this late in life but with a plan. I watched a documentary by Mike Parker Pearson on Stonehenge and the genetics of cattle found at SH from other areas of the UK. It was a quite brilliant amalysis but the final conclusions were jaw droppingly unrelated to the findings with the flimsiest of evidence so i did some research. I stumbled upon a book called 'civilisation one' by Knight and Butler and this led me to Thom's first book. After i had read the introduction i knew immediately that 'something was rotten in the State of Denmark'

I went away for a couple of months to a warm comfortable place and analysed Thom's outputs and summarised them in my first book. It was immediately clear that he had discovered a system of measurement and that the megalithic yard was just a component.I decided the best place to have the book reviwed was the megalithic portal and paid to have a run of copies published professionally. The book lays out an audit programme to be followed that at the time of publication i belived would enable 'the megalithic code' to be cracked in particular the relationship between the imperial system and Thom's system.

The plan was to publicly record this process on the megalithic portal website as on line working papers and findings and this is now complete. In the process three more books. 'The Answer', 'Proving the Megalithic Yard' and 'The Eclipse'. All very public and at times quite fraught because i had backed myself that i could do it.

In my naivety I had no idea of the depth of the rift between Thom and the archaeology profession or that the portal was populated by very many archaeologists so it was never going to be a match made in heaven.

Anway i quickly linked the imperial and Thom's system using the ratio 33 to 34. This is a proof. If you use a unit of 33/34 imperial feet in the imperial system you get Thom's system. Thom's work has been systematically rubbished by academia using pseudo scentific evidence carrying no weight whatsoever. Thom was right.

It is ironic to be saying this on Graham Hancock's website as his work is supposedly pseudo scientific. The methods used to trash Thom are now turned on GH and he is accused of using methods already employed against Thom. It is catch 22.

Once the 99 to 102 relationship between the imperial and Thom is understood, and how the length of the unit is crtical to producing the system, the obvious base to look at is 100 as this is one step above the imperial and the 'universally sacred' base discovered by Thom. This is done in my last book.

Pi appears to go with the bases

99 is 1760/560
100 is 31416/10000
102 is 1632/520

Once it is realised that a unit of 99/102 imperial feet divided into the imperial system produces Thom's system the base 100 system can be reproduced.

This is 5280/99 x 100 = 5333.33333r the eclipse system (Universally sacred)

It is also 1320 x 100/99 = 1333.3333 base unit 1.3333 this is 4/3 or inverted 3/4.

It appears that we have been looking at the imperial system with our eyes wide shut.

In the last book the suggestion is that our ancestors so delighted and revelled in these numbers they hid the imperial system's sacred unit on top of a non sacred base 99 system. They are still laughing at us.

The imperial foot is base 100 as 100 x 0.12 and the unit that works with the imperial system is 9 x 10 x 11 x 12 = 11880 / 1000 or 11.88 inches or 0.99 of a foot.This is 99 x 0.12.

5280 / 0.99 = 5333.333r the eclipse prediction system, a naturally ocurring system.

Thom's unit is 102 x 0.12 = 1.02 feet.

5440 / 1.02 = 5333.333r the eclipse system.

All systems converge on base 100. The Welsh (Druidic), the Scottish (Pictish), and the English imperial [using the correct sacred unit on the wrong base system].

'Proving the megalithic yard' is a vital stepping stone to confirming that the imperial system is ancient.

Here is the eclipse times table.

1.333333333
2.666666667
4
5.333333333
6.666666667
8
9.333333333
10.66666667
12
13.33333333
14.66666667
16
17.33333333
18.66666667
20
21.33333333
22.66666667
24
25.33333333
26.66666667
28
29.33333333 x 12 = 352 x 15 = 5280

They did not use decimals probably.

The base unit is 4/3 and the inversion 3/4.

This unit as root 4/3 and root 3/4 explains Hugh Franklin's anaysis of the GP.

At SH they did not use square roots they used Pi squared as

1760/560 x 1632/520 x 91 = 89760 imperial feet the Aubrey circumference in units of 0.12 of an imperial foot.

This is one season of 91 days so x 4 to get the 364 day Asimov year and x 8 to get the 10 day reset period using 365.25 day years.

Happy New Year to all the people i have agreed with and crossed swords with on this journey so far, still a long way to go.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 31-Dec-17 10:51 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Let there be Phos :) 2636 magisterchessmutt 16-Dec-17 03:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 447 magisterchessmutt 16-Dec-17 14:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 462 drew 17-Dec-17 02:30
Re: Let there be Phos :) 326 magisterchessmutt 17-Dec-17 14:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 422 Sirfiroth 17-Dec-17 21:38
Re: Let there be Phos :) 377 magisterchessmutt 17-Dec-17 22:29
Re: Let there be Phos :) 426 Horatech 18-Dec-17 06:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 327 magisterchessmutt 18-Dec-17 14:03
Re: Let there be Phos :) 447 Horatech 18-Dec-17 23:27
Re: Let there be Phos :) 370 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 02:49
Re: Let there be Phos :) 344 molder 19-Dec-17 05:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) 364 Horatech 19-Dec-17 06:19
Re: Let there be Phos :) 347 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 06:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 360 molder 19-Dec-17 07:11
Re: Let there be Phos :) 423 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 11:56
Re: Let there be Phos :) 345 Sirfiroth 19-Dec-17 19:32
Re: Let there be Phos :) 403 magisterchessmutt 20-Dec-17 03:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) 323 Sirfiroth 20-Dec-17 16:03
Re: Let there be Phos :) 347 magisterchessmutt 21-Dec-17 06:22
Re: Let there be Phos :) 317 molder 19-Dec-17 22:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 351 magisterchessmutt 20-Dec-17 02:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 345 molder 20-Dec-17 20:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) 369 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 02:33
Re: Let there be Phos :) 352 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 04:23
Re: Let there be Phos :) 357 mmstud 22-Dec-17 08:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 367 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 10:44
Re: Let there be Phos :) 345 mmstud 22-Dec-17 12:26
Re: Let there be Phos :) 438 magisterchessmutt 23-Dec-17 00:47
Re: Let there be Phos :) 481 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 15:20
Re: Let there be Phos :) 430 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 04:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 368 drew 18-Dec-17 00:51
Re: Let there be Phos :) 375 magisterchessmutt 18-Dec-17 02:11
Re: Let there be Phos :) 486 mmstud 22-Dec-17 14:44
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 449 molder 22-Dec-17 21:21
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 504 molder 23-Dec-17 22:27
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 405 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 01:55
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 443 magisterchessmutt 26-Dec-17 14:53
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 338 molder 26-Dec-17 21:51
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 361 magisterchessmutt 27-Dec-17 03:36
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 342 molder 27-Dec-17 05:02
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 387 magisterchessmutt 27-Dec-17 11:07
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 385 rodz111 29-Dec-17 22:44
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 312 Sirfiroth 28-Dec-17 18:28
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 402 DavidK 28-Dec-17 19:33
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 407 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 02:42
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 442 Sirfiroth 29-Dec-17 14:27
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 382 DavidK 29-Dec-17 15:05
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 411 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 01:37
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 506 DavidK 29-Dec-17 01:52
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 573 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 03:04
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 321 molder 31-Dec-17 22:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) 450 cladking 28-Dec-17 20:36
Re: Let there be Phos :) 390 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 01:47
Re: Let there be Phos :) 380 cladking 29-Dec-17 02:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 362 cladking 29-Dec-17 23:02
Re: Let there be Phos :) 496 DavidK 29-Dec-17 10:51
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Target Practice 393 magisterchessmutt 30-Dec-17 03:24
Re: Let there be Phos :) 427 DavidK 29-Dec-17 15:22
Re: Let there be Phos :) 389 magisterchessmutt 30-Dec-17 04:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 491 DavidK 30-Dec-17 15:56
Re: Let there be Phos :) 343 magisterchessmutt 31-Dec-17 05:32
Re: Let there be Phos :) 466 DavidK 31-Dec-17 10:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 394 magisterchessmutt 31-Dec-17 12:18
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 451 magisterchessmutt 01-Jan-18 11:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 434 DavidK 01-Jan-18 11:40
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 403 magisterchessmutt 01-Jan-18 13:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 391 DavidK 01-Jan-18 13:39
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 383 magisterchessmutt 02-Jan-18 04:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 432 DavidK 02-Jan-18 09:34
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 359 magisterchessmutt 02-Jan-18 12:30
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 470 DavidK 02-Jan-18 13:20
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 343 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 03:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 314 molder 03-Jan-18 06:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 308 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 07:04
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 457 molder 03-Jan-18 08:47
Re:A Canonical alternative 393 cloister 03-Jan-18 10:14
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 324 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 11:16
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 325 molder 03-Jan-18 11:46
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 308 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 12:18
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 351 molder 03-Jan-18 12:34
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 318 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 13:19
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 342 cloister 03-Jan-18 15:20
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 326 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 16:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 429 cloister 05-Jan-18 17:23
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 323 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 18:14
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 320 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 04:45
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 391 cloister 08-Jan-18 11:25
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 368 DavidK 03-Jan-18 15:37
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 344 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 17:31
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 390 DavidK 03-Jan-18 18:54
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 327 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 03:04
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 457 DavidK 04-Jan-18 09:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 296 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 11:20
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 378 DavidK 04-Jan-18 11:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 461 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 12:13
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 354 Sirfiroth 07-Jan-18 00:00
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 384 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 00:46
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 339 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 07:41
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 396 cloister 07-Jan-18 09:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 377 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 16:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 416 DavidK 07-Jan-18 18:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 402 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 22:43
Re: Let there be Phos :) 409 DavidK 07-Jan-18 23:09
Re: Let there be Phos :) 401 DavidK 07-Jan-18 23:53
Re: Let there be Phos :) 363 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 03:37
Re: Let there be Phos :) 360 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 04:05
Re: Let there be Phos :) 356 DavidK 08-Jan-18 08:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 334 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 10:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 364 DavidK 08-Jan-18 10:59
Re: Let there be Phos :) 308 DavidK 08-Jan-18 11:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 325 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 12:35
Re: Let there be Phos :) 345 DavidK 08-Jan-18 17:45
Re: Let there be Phos :) 335 DavidK 08-Jan-18 19:43
Re: Let there be Phos :) 424 magisterchessmutt 09-Jan-18 03:46
Re: Let there be Phos :) 360 DavidK 09-Jan-18 18:21
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 363 molder 10-Jan-18 13:33
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 314 molder 10-Jan-18 13:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 316 DavidK 10-Jan-18 15:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 271 DavidK 10-Jan-18 16:38
Re: Let there be Phos :) 306 DavidK 10-Jan-18 16:46
Re: Let there be Phos :) 357 DavidK 10-Jan-18 21:18
Re: Let there be Phos :) 339 molder 11-Jan-18 21:54
Re: Let there be Phos :) 329 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 10:29
Re: Let there be Phos :) 293 DavidK 12-Jan-18 11:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 283 DavidK 12-Jan-18 10:40
Re: Let there be Phos :) 311 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 12:01
Re: Let there be Phos :) 315 DavidK 12-Jan-18 13:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 285 DavidK 12-Jan-18 12:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 335 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 12:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 373 DavidK 12-Jan-18 14:16
Re: Let there be Phos :) 329 magisterchessmutt 13-Jan-18 11:34
Re: Let there be Phos :) 284 DavidK 13-Jan-18 12:04
Re: Let there be Phos :) 330 magisterchessmutt 13-Jan-18 12:31
Re: Let there be Phos :) 462 DavidK 13-Jan-18 12:47
Let there be Phos at the GP 491 DavidK 17-Jan-18 15:13
Re: Let there be Phos :) 349 DavidK 22-Mar-18 22:50
Re: Let there be Phos :) 402 magisterchessmutt 27-Mar-18 21:19
Re: Let there be Phos :) 380 DavidK 07-Apr-18 20:01


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.