Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Stephen

you say ' It's one thing for someone like John Neal to cite the ratio of an Assyrian Ft. to an Imperial Ft. as 21/20, and another thing entirely to explain why and how this came about. ----- It can't be done through simple linear measurement analysis. One thing I do know, is that what we call the Imperial Metric system, and Megalithic Metric systems, are co-joined at the Vesica hip, in this evolutionary prerecorded history process.'

copy that.

i nave come into this late in life but with a plan. I watched a documentary by Mike Parker Pearson on Stonehenge and the genetics of cattle found at SH from other areas of the UK. It was a quite brilliant amalysis but the final conclusions were jaw droppingly unrelated to the findings with the flimsiest of evidence so i did some research. I stumbled upon a book called 'civilisation one' by Knight and Butler and this led me to Thom's first book. After i had read the introduction i knew immediately that 'something was rotten in the State of Denmark'

I went away for a couple of months to a warm comfortable place and analysed Thom's outputs and summarised them in my first book. It was immediately clear that he had discovered a system of measurement and that the megalithic yard was just a component.I decided the best place to have the book reviwed was the megalithic portal and paid to have a run of copies published professionally. The book lays out an audit programme to be followed that at the time of publication i belived would enable 'the megalithic code' to be cracked in particular the relationship between the imperial system and Thom's system.

The plan was to publicly record this process on the megalithic portal website as on line working papers and findings and this is now complete. In the process three more books. 'The Answer', 'Proving the Megalithic Yard' and 'The Eclipse'. All very public and at times quite fraught because i had backed myself that i could do it.

In my naivety I had no idea of the depth of the rift between Thom and the archaeology profession or that the portal was populated by very many archaeologists so it was never going to be a match made in heaven.

Anway i quickly linked the imperial and Thom's system using the ratio 33 to 34. This is a proof. If you use a unit of 33/34 imperial feet in the imperial system you get Thom's system. Thom's work has been systematically rubbished by academia using pseudo scentific evidence carrying no weight whatsoever. Thom was right.

It is ironic to be saying this on Graham Hancock's website as his work is supposedly pseudo scientific. The methods used to trash Thom are now turned on GH and he is accused of using methods already employed against Thom. It is catch 22.

Once the 99 to 102 relationship between the imperial and Thom is understood, and how the length of the unit is crtical to producing the system, the obvious base to look at is 100 as this is one step above the imperial and the 'universally sacred' base discovered by Thom. This is done in my last book.

Pi appears to go with the bases

99 is 1760/560
100 is 31416/10000
102 is 1632/520

Once it is realised that a unit of 99/102 imperial feet divided into the imperial system produces Thom's system the base 100 system can be reproduced.

This is 5280/99 x 100 = 5333.33333r the eclipse system (Universally sacred)

It is also 1320 x 100/99 = 1333.3333 base unit 1.3333 this is 4/3 or inverted 3/4.

It appears that we have been looking at the imperial system with our eyes wide shut.

In the last book the suggestion is that our ancestors so delighted and revelled in these numbers they hid the imperial system's sacred unit on top of a non sacred base 99 system. They are still laughing at us.

The imperial foot is base 100 as 100 x 0.12 and the unit that works with the imperial system is 9 x 10 x 11 x 12 = 11880 / 1000 or 11.88 inches or 0.99 of a foot.This is 99 x 0.12.

5280 / 0.99 = 5333.333r the eclipse prediction system, a naturally ocurring system.

Thom's unit is 102 x 0.12 = 1.02 feet.

5440 / 1.02 = 5333.333r the eclipse system.

All systems converge on base 100. The Welsh (Druidic), the Scottish (Pictish), and the English imperial [using the correct sacred unit on the wrong base system].

'Proving the megalithic yard' is a vital stepping stone to confirming that the imperial system is ancient.

Here is the eclipse times table.

1.333333333
2.666666667
4
5.333333333
6.666666667
8
9.333333333
10.66666667
12
13.33333333
14.66666667
16
17.33333333
18.66666667
20
21.33333333
22.66666667
24
25.33333333
26.66666667
28
29.33333333 x 12 = 352 x 15 = 5280

They did not use decimals probably.

The base unit is 4/3 and the inversion 3/4.

This unit as root 4/3 and root 3/4 explains Hugh Franklin's anaysis of the GP.

At SH they did not use square roots they used Pi squared as

1760/560 x 1632/520 x 91 = 89760 imperial feet the Aubrey circumference in units of 0.12 of an imperial foot.

This is one season of 91 days so x 4 to get the 364 day Asimov year and x 8 to get the 10 day reset period using 365.25 day years.

Happy New Year to all the people i have agreed with and crossed swords with on this journey so far, still a long way to go.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 31-Dec-17 10:51 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Let there be Phos :) 2657 magisterchessmutt 16-Dec-17 03:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 466 magisterchessmutt 16-Dec-17 14:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 473 drew 17-Dec-17 02:30
Re: Let there be Phos :) 336 magisterchessmutt 17-Dec-17 14:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 433 Sirfiroth 17-Dec-17 21:38
Re: Let there be Phos :) 397 magisterchessmutt 17-Dec-17 22:29
Re: Let there be Phos :) 444 Horatech 18-Dec-17 06:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 339 magisterchessmutt 18-Dec-17 14:03
Re: Let there be Phos :) 467 Horatech 18-Dec-17 23:27
Re: Let there be Phos :) 381 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 02:49
Re: Let there be Phos :) 360 molder 19-Dec-17 05:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) 380 Horatech 19-Dec-17 06:19
Re: Let there be Phos :) 361 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 06:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 372 molder 19-Dec-17 07:11
Re: Let there be Phos :) 432 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 11:56
Re: Let there be Phos :) 356 Sirfiroth 19-Dec-17 19:32
Re: Let there be Phos :) 414 magisterchessmutt 20-Dec-17 03:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) 331 Sirfiroth 20-Dec-17 16:03
Re: Let there be Phos :) 358 magisterchessmutt 21-Dec-17 06:22
Re: Let there be Phos :) 325 molder 19-Dec-17 22:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 366 magisterchessmutt 20-Dec-17 02:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 354 molder 20-Dec-17 20:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) 380 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 02:33
Re: Let there be Phos :) 375 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 04:23
Re: Let there be Phos :) 373 mmstud 22-Dec-17 08:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 377 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 10:44
Re: Let there be Phos :) 358 mmstud 22-Dec-17 12:26
Re: Let there be Phos :) 449 magisterchessmutt 23-Dec-17 00:47
Re: Let there be Phos :) 492 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 15:20
Re: Let there be Phos :) 443 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 04:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 376 drew 18-Dec-17 00:51
Re: Let there be Phos :) 384 magisterchessmutt 18-Dec-17 02:11
Re: Let there be Phos :) 500 mmstud 22-Dec-17 14:44
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 461 molder 22-Dec-17 21:21
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 520 molder 23-Dec-17 22:27
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 417 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 01:55
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 466 magisterchessmutt 26-Dec-17 14:53
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 347 molder 26-Dec-17 21:51
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 405 magisterchessmutt 27-Dec-17 03:36
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 355 molder 27-Dec-17 05:02
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 395 magisterchessmutt 27-Dec-17 11:07
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 400 rodz111 29-Dec-17 22:44
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 321 Sirfiroth 28-Dec-17 18:28
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 413 DavidK 28-Dec-17 19:33
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 419 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 02:42
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 454 Sirfiroth 29-Dec-17 14:27
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 394 DavidK 29-Dec-17 15:05
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 427 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 01:37
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 539 DavidK 29-Dec-17 01:52
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 630 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 03:04
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 334 molder 31-Dec-17 22:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) 460 cladking 28-Dec-17 20:36
Re: Let there be Phos :) 399 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 01:47
Re: Let there be Phos :) 398 cladking 29-Dec-17 02:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 371 cladking 29-Dec-17 23:02
Re: Let there be Phos :) 510 DavidK 29-Dec-17 10:51
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Target Practice 405 magisterchessmutt 30-Dec-17 03:24
Re: Let there be Phos :) 441 DavidK 29-Dec-17 15:22
Re: Let there be Phos :) 401 magisterchessmutt 30-Dec-17 04:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 515 DavidK 30-Dec-17 15:56
Re: Let there be Phos :) 353 magisterchessmutt 31-Dec-17 05:32
Re: Let there be Phos :) 476 DavidK 31-Dec-17 10:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 404 magisterchessmutt 31-Dec-17 12:18
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 483 magisterchessmutt 01-Jan-18 11:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 447 DavidK 01-Jan-18 11:40
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 417 magisterchessmutt 01-Jan-18 13:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 404 DavidK 01-Jan-18 13:39
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 393 magisterchessmutt 02-Jan-18 04:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 458 DavidK 02-Jan-18 09:34
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 375 magisterchessmutt 02-Jan-18 12:30
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 484 DavidK 02-Jan-18 13:20
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 356 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 03:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 324 molder 03-Jan-18 06:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 319 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 07:04
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 469 molder 03-Jan-18 08:47
Re:A Canonical alternative 406 cloister 03-Jan-18 10:14
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 333 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 11:16
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 349 molder 03-Jan-18 11:46
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 320 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 12:18
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 360 molder 03-Jan-18 12:34
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 328 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 13:19
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 352 cloister 03-Jan-18 15:20
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 337 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 16:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 442 cloister 05-Jan-18 17:23
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 333 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 18:14
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 331 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 04:45
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 403 cloister 08-Jan-18 11:25
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 380 DavidK 03-Jan-18 15:37
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 357 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 17:31
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 402 DavidK 03-Jan-18 18:54
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 349 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 03:04
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 469 DavidK 04-Jan-18 09:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 305 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 11:20
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 392 DavidK 04-Jan-18 11:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 470 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 12:13
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 365 Sirfiroth 07-Jan-18 00:00
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 396 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 00:46
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 349 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 07:41
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 407 cloister 07-Jan-18 09:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 406 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 16:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 429 DavidK 07-Jan-18 18:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 413 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 22:43
Re: Let there be Phos :) 434 DavidK 07-Jan-18 23:09
Re: Let there be Phos :) 410 DavidK 07-Jan-18 23:53
Re: Let there be Phos :) 374 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 03:37
Re: Let there be Phos :) 371 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 04:05
Re: Let there be Phos :) 372 DavidK 08-Jan-18 08:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 344 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 10:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 377 DavidK 08-Jan-18 10:59
Re: Let there be Phos :) 320 DavidK 08-Jan-18 11:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 337 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 12:35
Re: Let there be Phos :) 352 DavidK 08-Jan-18 17:45
Re: Let there be Phos :) 349 DavidK 08-Jan-18 19:43
Re: Let there be Phos :) 435 magisterchessmutt 09-Jan-18 03:46
Re: Let there be Phos :) 371 DavidK 09-Jan-18 18:21
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 375 molder 10-Jan-18 13:33
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 324 molder 10-Jan-18 13:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 329 DavidK 10-Jan-18 15:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 284 DavidK 10-Jan-18 16:38
Re: Let there be Phos :) 320 DavidK 10-Jan-18 16:46
Re: Let there be Phos :) 369 DavidK 10-Jan-18 21:18
Re: Let there be Phos :) 353 molder 11-Jan-18 21:54
Re: Let there be Phos :) 339 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 10:29
Re: Let there be Phos :) 304 DavidK 12-Jan-18 11:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 302 DavidK 12-Jan-18 10:40
Re: Let there be Phos :) 325 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 12:01
Re: Let there be Phos :) 325 DavidK 12-Jan-18 13:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 296 DavidK 12-Jan-18 12:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 368 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 12:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 387 DavidK 12-Jan-18 14:16
Re: Let there be Phos :) 340 magisterchessmutt 13-Jan-18 11:34
Re: Let there be Phos :) 300 DavidK 13-Jan-18 12:04
Re: Let there be Phos :) 342 magisterchessmutt 13-Jan-18 12:31
Re: Let there be Phos :) 507 DavidK 13-Jan-18 12:47
Let there be Phos at the GP 503 DavidK 17-Jan-18 15:13
Re: Let there be Phos :) 361 DavidK 22-Mar-18 22:50
Re: Let there be Phos :) 412 magisterchessmutt 27-Mar-18 21:19
Re: Let there be Phos :) 393 DavidK 07-Apr-18 20:01


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.