Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Stephen

you say ' It's one thing for someone like John Neal to cite the ratio of an Assyrian Ft. to an Imperial Ft. as 21/20, and another thing entirely to explain why and how this came about. ----- It can't be done through simple linear measurement analysis. One thing I do know, is that what we call the Imperial Metric system, and Megalithic Metric systems, are co-joined at the Vesica hip, in this evolutionary prerecorded history process.'

copy that.

i nave come into this late in life but with a plan. I watched a documentary by Mike Parker Pearson on Stonehenge and the genetics of cattle found at SH from other areas of the UK. It was a quite brilliant amalysis but the final conclusions were jaw droppingly unrelated to the findings with the flimsiest of evidence so i did some research. I stumbled upon a book called 'civilisation one' by Knight and Butler and this led me to Thom's first book. After i had read the introduction i knew immediately that 'something was rotten in the State of Denmark'

I went away for a couple of months to a warm comfortable place and analysed Thom's outputs and summarised them in my first book. It was immediately clear that he had discovered a system of measurement and that the megalithic yard was just a component.I decided the best place to have the book reviwed was the megalithic portal and paid to have a run of copies published professionally. The book lays out an audit programme to be followed that at the time of publication i belived would enable 'the megalithic code' to be cracked in particular the relationship between the imperial system and Thom's system.

The plan was to publicly record this process on the megalithic portal website as on line working papers and findings and this is now complete. In the process three more books. 'The Answer', 'Proving the Megalithic Yard' and 'The Eclipse'. All very public and at times quite fraught because i had backed myself that i could do it.

In my naivety I had no idea of the depth of the rift between Thom and the archaeology profession or that the portal was populated by very many archaeologists so it was never going to be a match made in heaven.

Anway i quickly linked the imperial and Thom's system using the ratio 33 to 34. This is a proof. If you use a unit of 33/34 imperial feet in the imperial system you get Thom's system. Thom's work has been systematically rubbished by academia using pseudo scentific evidence carrying no weight whatsoever. Thom was right.

It is ironic to be saying this on Graham Hancock's website as his work is supposedly pseudo scientific. The methods used to trash Thom are now turned on GH and he is accused of using methods already employed against Thom. It is catch 22.

Once the 99 to 102 relationship between the imperial and Thom is understood, and how the length of the unit is crtical to producing the system, the obvious base to look at is 100 as this is one step above the imperial and the 'universally sacred' base discovered by Thom. This is done in my last book.

Pi appears to go with the bases

99 is 1760/560
100 is 31416/10000
102 is 1632/520

Once it is realised that a unit of 99/102 imperial feet divided into the imperial system produces Thom's system the base 100 system can be reproduced.

This is 5280/99 x 100 = 5333.33333r the eclipse system (Universally sacred)

It is also 1320 x 100/99 = 1333.3333 base unit 1.3333 this is 4/3 or inverted 3/4.

It appears that we have been looking at the imperial system with our eyes wide shut.

In the last book the suggestion is that our ancestors so delighted and revelled in these numbers they hid the imperial system's sacred unit on top of a non sacred base 99 system. They are still laughing at us.

The imperial foot is base 100 as 100 x 0.12 and the unit that works with the imperial system is 9 x 10 x 11 x 12 = 11880 / 1000 or 11.88 inches or 0.99 of a foot.This is 99 x 0.12.

5280 / 0.99 = 5333.333r the eclipse prediction system, a naturally ocurring system.

Thom's unit is 102 x 0.12 = 1.02 feet.

5440 / 1.02 = 5333.333r the eclipse system.

All systems converge on base 100. The Welsh (Druidic), the Scottish (Pictish), and the English imperial [using the correct sacred unit on the wrong base system].

'Proving the megalithic yard' is a vital stepping stone to confirming that the imperial system is ancient.

Here is the eclipse times table.

1.333333333
2.666666667
4
5.333333333
6.666666667
8
9.333333333
10.66666667
12
13.33333333
14.66666667
16
17.33333333
18.66666667
20
21.33333333
22.66666667
24
25.33333333
26.66666667
28
29.33333333 x 12 = 352 x 15 = 5280

They did not use decimals probably.

The base unit is 4/3 and the inversion 3/4.

This unit as root 4/3 and root 3/4 explains Hugh Franklin's anaysis of the GP.

At SH they did not use square roots they used Pi squared as

1760/560 x 1632/520 x 91 = 89760 imperial feet the Aubrey circumference in units of 0.12 of an imperial foot.

This is one season of 91 days so x 4 to get the 364 day Asimov year and x 8 to get the 10 day reset period using 365.25 day years.

Happy New Year to all the people i have agreed with and crossed swords with on this journey so far, still a long way to go.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 31-Dec-17 10:51 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Let there be Phos :) 2565 magisterchessmutt 16-Dec-17 03:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 384 magisterchessmutt 16-Dec-17 14:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 422 drew 17-Dec-17 02:30
Re: Let there be Phos :) 289 magisterchessmutt 17-Dec-17 14:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 389 Sirfiroth 17-Dec-17 21:38
Re: Let there be Phos :) 327 magisterchessmutt 17-Dec-17 22:29
Re: Let there be Phos :) 387 Horatech 18-Dec-17 06:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 296 magisterchessmutt 18-Dec-17 14:03
Re: Let there be Phos :) 410 Horatech 18-Dec-17 23:27
Re: Let there be Phos :) 335 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 02:49
Re: Let there be Phos :) 308 molder 19-Dec-17 05:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) 322 Horatech 19-Dec-17 06:19
Re: Let there be Phos :) 314 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 06:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 321 molder 19-Dec-17 07:11
Re: Let there be Phos :) 394 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 11:56
Re: Let there be Phos :) 313 Sirfiroth 19-Dec-17 19:32
Re: Let there be Phos :) 371 magisterchessmutt 20-Dec-17 03:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) 282 Sirfiroth 20-Dec-17 16:03
Re: Let there be Phos :) 311 magisterchessmutt 21-Dec-17 06:22
Re: Let there be Phos :) 279 molder 19-Dec-17 22:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 315 magisterchessmutt 20-Dec-17 02:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 308 molder 20-Dec-17 20:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) 335 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 02:33
Re: Let there be Phos :) 303 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 04:23
Re: Let there be Phos :) 316 mmstud 22-Dec-17 08:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 334 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 10:44
Re: Let there be Phos :) 307 mmstud 22-Dec-17 12:26
Re: Let there be Phos :) 407 magisterchessmutt 23-Dec-17 00:47
Re: Let there be Phos :) 439 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 15:20
Re: Let there be Phos :) 397 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 04:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 332 drew 18-Dec-17 00:51
Re: Let there be Phos :) 342 magisterchessmutt 18-Dec-17 02:11
Re: Let there be Phos :) 442 mmstud 22-Dec-17 14:44
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 415 molder 22-Dec-17 21:21
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 462 molder 23-Dec-17 22:27
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 366 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 01:55
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 376 magisterchessmutt 26-Dec-17 14:53
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 306 molder 26-Dec-17 21:51
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 320 magisterchessmutt 27-Dec-17 03:36
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 308 molder 27-Dec-17 05:02
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 355 magisterchessmutt 27-Dec-17 11:07
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 347 rodz111 29-Dec-17 22:44
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 275 Sirfiroth 28-Dec-17 18:28
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 360 DavidK 28-Dec-17 19:33
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 367 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 02:42
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 409 Sirfiroth 29-Dec-17 14:27
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 347 DavidK 29-Dec-17 15:05
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 362 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 01:37
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 426 DavidK 29-Dec-17 01:52
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 482 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 03:04
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 281 molder 31-Dec-17 22:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) 416 cladking 28-Dec-17 20:36
Re: Let there be Phos :) 352 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 01:47
Re: Let there be Phos :) 346 cladking 29-Dec-17 02:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 327 cladking 29-Dec-17 23:02
Re: Let there be Phos :) 458 DavidK 29-Dec-17 10:51
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Target Practice 357 magisterchessmutt 30-Dec-17 03:24
Re: Let there be Phos :) 393 DavidK 29-Dec-17 15:22
Re: Let there be Phos :) 351 magisterchessmutt 30-Dec-17 04:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 426 DavidK 30-Dec-17 15:56
Re: Let there be Phos :) 308 magisterchessmutt 31-Dec-17 05:32
Re: Let there be Phos :) 426 DavidK 31-Dec-17 10:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 353 magisterchessmutt 31-Dec-17 12:18
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 370 magisterchessmutt 01-Jan-18 11:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 384 DavidK 01-Jan-18 11:40
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 363 magisterchessmutt 01-Jan-18 13:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 353 DavidK 01-Jan-18 13:39
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 347 magisterchessmutt 02-Jan-18 04:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 391 DavidK 02-Jan-18 09:34
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 318 magisterchessmutt 02-Jan-18 12:30
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 429 DavidK 02-Jan-18 13:20
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 311 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 03:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 279 molder 03-Jan-18 06:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 270 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 07:04
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 415 molder 03-Jan-18 08:47
Re:A Canonical alternative 355 cloister 03-Jan-18 10:14
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 286 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 11:16
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 287 molder 03-Jan-18 11:46
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 273 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 12:18
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 315 molder 03-Jan-18 12:34
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 280 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 13:19
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 304 cloister 03-Jan-18 15:20
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 288 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 16:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 390 cloister 05-Jan-18 17:23
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 292 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 18:14
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 288 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 04:45
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 360 cloister 08-Jan-18 11:25
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 334 DavidK 03-Jan-18 15:37
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 307 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 17:31
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 350 DavidK 03-Jan-18 18:54
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 296 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 03:04
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 416 DavidK 04-Jan-18 09:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 256 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 11:20
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 316 DavidK 04-Jan-18 11:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 426 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 12:13
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 316 Sirfiroth 07-Jan-18 00:00
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 346 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 00:46
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 299 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 07:41
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 360 cloister 07-Jan-18 09:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 326 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 16:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 381 DavidK 07-Jan-18 18:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 359 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 22:43
Re: Let there be Phos :) 367 DavidK 07-Jan-18 23:09
Re: Let there be Phos :) 355 DavidK 07-Jan-18 23:53
Re: Let there be Phos :) 315 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 03:37
Re: Let there be Phos :) 324 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 04:05
Re: Let there be Phos :) 320 DavidK 08-Jan-18 08:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 299 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 10:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 325 DavidK 08-Jan-18 10:59
Re: Let there be Phos :) 271 DavidK 08-Jan-18 11:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 293 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 12:35
Re: Let there be Phos :) 306 DavidK 08-Jan-18 17:45
Re: Let there be Phos :) 302 DavidK 08-Jan-18 19:43
Re: Let there be Phos :) 388 magisterchessmutt 09-Jan-18 03:46
Re: Let there be Phos :) 322 DavidK 09-Jan-18 18:21
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 327 molder 10-Jan-18 13:33
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 285 molder 10-Jan-18 13:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 287 DavidK 10-Jan-18 15:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 241 DavidK 10-Jan-18 16:38
Re: Let there be Phos :) 281 DavidK 10-Jan-18 16:46
Re: Let there be Phos :) 328 DavidK 10-Jan-18 21:18
Re: Let there be Phos :) 293 molder 11-Jan-18 21:54
Re: Let there be Phos :) 293 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 10:29
Re: Let there be Phos :) 258 DavidK 12-Jan-18 11:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 250 DavidK 12-Jan-18 10:40
Re: Let there be Phos :) 282 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 12:01
Re: Let there be Phos :) 283 DavidK 12-Jan-18 13:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 259 DavidK 12-Jan-18 12:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 296 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 12:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 337 DavidK 12-Jan-18 14:16
Re: Let there be Phos :) 294 magisterchessmutt 13-Jan-18 11:34
Re: Let there be Phos :) 252 DavidK 13-Jan-18 12:04
Re: Let there be Phos :) 302 magisterchessmutt 13-Jan-18 12:31
Re: Let there be Phos :) 388 DavidK 13-Jan-18 12:47
Let there be Phos at the GP 460 DavidK 17-Jan-18 15:13
Re: Let there be Phos :) 321 DavidK 22-Mar-18 22:50
Re: Let there be Phos :) 368 magisterchessmutt 27-Mar-18 21:19
Re: Let there be Phos :) 353 DavidK 07-Apr-18 20:01


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.