Usimare Setepenre Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The offerings were mentioned as being brought to
> "Akhet Khufu." This was the ancient name of the
> Great Pyramid and is indisputable evidence for the
> pyramid having been a tomb.

Even if for the sake of argument we accept that "Akhet Khufu" was indeed the ancient name for the pyramid and not just a name for the location.
How do we know that any "offerings" were food supplies specifically for pyramid construction workers.
How do we know that the "offerings" weren't of a purely religious nature or even supplies for other work being carried out in the locale.
I'm actively disputing what you claim to be "indisputable".

You may well interpret the meaning and purpose in your own way, however that's not in any way indisputable evidence.
Insults and claims of your own intellectual superiority does nothing but diminish your argument.
I therefore remain sceptical.