Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If it "makes no difference to you" then why all
> the huffing and puffing? Why don't you just adhere
> to Racho's advice and don't respond to posts which
> get you all hot and bothered?

Interesting sexual connotation you use there. Might it be a way of belittling the poster? Especially a woman poster? Warning..... chauvinistic remarks are not good for your health.
If I want yours or Racho's or Ori's advice, I'll ask for it. Don't worry about what I respond to.
FYI, am not hot and bothered. Neither sexually nor in anger. But if you want to make it sexual, good luck with that.

> Unlike yourself who appears quite content to not
> only immerse herself in sub-standard rubbish but
> also takes considerable time to defend it, there
> are others who prefer a higher standard of proof.

And your higher standards of proof for the natural formation of giant spheres is ...??
Am waiting for that "educational context" that presents the same volume of material as in the video.
You hinted that you had come across such. Or was that just a way to trash a video that does you no harm?

> Considering his ongoing crusade for such lofty
> levels I would have thought that Dr. Femano would
> also appreciate work of a higher quality.

I wouldn't worry about Ori. You should worry about your claim of "educational context".

> But really your attack post is just another thinly
> veiled defense of Dr Femano and the crackpot
> label. From what I can gather this isn't the first
> time you have selflessly done so.

Not defending Ori at all, what the hell does he have to do with it? You are reading too many corpuscles.
Am defending Vlad, or are you not astute enough to pick that up. You really need to get over the Ori obsession.

> Wacko or crackpot?
>
> Matters little to me as well.

Then why use it? It must matter to you, since you use it to covertly insult someone.

> Do you also think that the seagulls at Niagara
> Falls are UFOs?

Have no idea what you're talking about. I've never heard of the Niagara Falls seagulls. What do they have to do with giant stone spheres anyways? Or was that just an unnecessary way of insulting someone?

Evidently you have no desire to discuss giant stone spheres or unusual stone work of any kind. Your objective is ...??

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1984 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 444 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 124 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 150 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 494 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 480 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 590 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 377 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 391 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 277 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 305 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 318 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 270 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 374 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 481 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 298 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 371 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 339 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 379 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 256 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 297 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 330 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 238 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 237 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 277 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 250 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 346 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 286 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 279 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 313 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 349 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 348 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 389 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 401 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 331 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 350 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 420 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 269 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 375 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 423 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 312 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 466 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 326 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 308 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 270 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 406 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 342 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 397 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 338 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 310 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 290 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 379 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 267 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 349 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 360 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 390 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 332 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 347 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 358 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 284 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 383 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 400 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 434 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 489 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 423 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 369 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 376 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 356 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 396 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 372 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 333 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 364 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.