Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Audrey

> Please help. I may need these special spectacles
> that Racho talks about BUT where is the
> column you speak of?

The column is presumed, by the hole left in the rock. Something round was cut out of the rock. You could call it a stool, or pillar, whatever. Racho is saying, why cut a round long piece when it would be sensible to cut a square chunk of rock and then finish it into a column/pillar/stool.

> What are the dimensions of the semi circular bore
> hole? How big is the total block seeming to me
> sedimentary conglomerate? What is the geological
> description of the rock?

How the hell am I supposed to know. Google works just as well for you. Would the answers really make a difference as to why cut a round piece instead of square?

> Did AE ever mummify bodies? Why, if not for
> religious /superstitious reasons?
> Did they ever include grave goods for the
> afterlife? Pre dynastic and after?
>
> Did Qin Shi Hung really make all that terracotta
> army? Why ? Was it not a burial with religious
> /superstitious reasons?

I don't care WHY the AE mummified. The AE didn't build the pyramids.

I don't consider the terracotta army to be ancient, no more than I consider Rome to be ancient. Because religion motivated Qin Shi Hung (if it did), does not mean religion motivated the pyramid builders. Anymore than it means religion motivates me.

> Do you think that human anthropomorphic figures
> with animal heads were real entities? Or was it
> religious /superstitious reasons?
> Don't you think they were 'gods' if not what is
> your better explanation?

I don't care. The AE squatters didn't build the pyramids.

> Have you read any or several versions of the Book
> of Coming Forth by day?

Have read the entire book. Even indexed it. And it has nothing to do with the pyramid builders.

> How can you dismiss
> religious /superstitious reasons? Was it all about
> a geyser powered unworkable insane construction
> technique?

The geyser remark has nothing to do with religious motives. Don't know how you can see a connection.
Could it be, you just wanted to make fun of someone?

Dismiss religious reasons for what exactly? Building pyramids? Well that's easy, the AE didn't build the pyramids so we don't know the motives of the real builders. Pretty shallow actually, to assume it was religion based, especially when the engineering screams mechanical based.

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1975 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 439 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 119 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 142 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 489 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 471 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 583 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 372 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 386 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 270 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 300 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 310 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 265 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 371 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 476 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 294 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 365 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 334 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 374 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 248 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 288 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 325 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 231 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 231 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 270 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 242 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 341 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 279 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 273 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 309 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 345 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 344 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 379 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 395 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 322 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 343 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 411 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 264 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 371 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 417 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 307 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 462 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 322 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 302 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 265 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 400 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 336 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 392 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 332 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 303 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 284 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 374 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 263 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 342 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 355 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 385 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 326 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 343 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 354 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 280 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 377 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 396 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 431 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 485 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 415 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 365 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 371 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 352 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 391 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 365 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 329 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 360 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.