Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Audrey

> Please help. I may need these special spectacles
> that Racho talks about BUT where is the
> column you speak of?

The column is presumed, by the hole left in the rock. Something round was cut out of the rock. You could call it a stool, or pillar, whatever. Racho is saying, why cut a round long piece when it would be sensible to cut a square chunk of rock and then finish it into a column/pillar/stool.

> What are the dimensions of the semi circular bore
> hole? How big is the total block seeming to me
> sedimentary conglomerate? What is the geological
> description of the rock?

How the hell am I supposed to know. Google works just as well for you. Would the answers really make a difference as to why cut a round piece instead of square?

> Did AE ever mummify bodies? Why, if not for
> religious /superstitious reasons?
> Did they ever include grave goods for the
> afterlife? Pre dynastic and after?
>
> Did Qin Shi Hung really make all that terracotta
> army? Why ? Was it not a burial with religious
> /superstitious reasons?

I don't care WHY the AE mummified. The AE didn't build the pyramids.

I don't consider the terracotta army to be ancient, no more than I consider Rome to be ancient. Because religion motivated Qin Shi Hung (if it did), does not mean religion motivated the pyramid builders. Anymore than it means religion motivates me.

> Do you think that human anthropomorphic figures
> with animal heads were real entities? Or was it
> religious /superstitious reasons?
> Don't you think they were 'gods' if not what is
> your better explanation?

I don't care. The AE squatters didn't build the pyramids.

> Have you read any or several versions of the Book
> of Coming Forth by day?

Have read the entire book. Even indexed it. And it has nothing to do with the pyramid builders.

> How can you dismiss
> religious /superstitious reasons? Was it all about
> a geyser powered unworkable insane construction
> technique?

The geyser remark has nothing to do with religious motives. Don't know how you can see a connection.
Could it be, you just wanted to make fun of someone?

Dismiss religious reasons for what exactly? Building pyramids? Well that's easy, the AE didn't build the pyramids so we don't know the motives of the real builders. Pretty shallow actually, to assume it was religion based, especially when the engineering screams mechanical based.

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1984 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 443 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 124 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 150 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 494 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 479 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 590 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 376 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 391 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 276 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 304 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 317 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 270 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 374 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 481 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 298 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 371 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 339 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 379 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 255 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 296 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 330 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 237 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 237 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 276 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 249 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 345 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 285 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 278 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 312 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 349 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 348 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 389 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 400 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 330 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 350 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 420 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 268 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 374 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 423 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 311 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 466 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 326 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 307 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 269 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 405 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 341 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 396 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 337 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 310 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 289 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 378 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 267 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 349 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 359 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 389 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 331 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 347 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 357 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 284 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 382 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 400 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 433 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 489 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 422 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 368 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 376 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 356 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 396 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 371 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 333 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 364 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.