Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Racho Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> and that is one difference between you and I, I
> suppose. There aren't very many natural formations
> in his videos. Occasional I guess but not many.
> The majority of the photos are of
> locations/structures which have been obviously
> worked on. You can be critical of his videos but
> why would you do that given that he's only
> providing pictures of really cool places that,
> otherwise, you would never really see? It's all
> about forming your own opinion after all. We don't
> have to agree on things but these videos should
> make all of us think about the same questions. who
> why how ...
>
> my view is that if one knows what to look for -
> and I've tried to point out things to look for and
> consider - ...most of this work is anomalous. Have
> you read what Tsurgi wrote about moving massive
> weights? There is a reality for moving large
> stones (let alone lifting them) which existed then
> as it does now. Trilithon stones should bother
> people.
>
> Nature may form round stones...but certainly not
> often. That's not the point. The point is to
> introduce oneself to new things which may or may
> not broaden ones personal knowledge base. Rightly
> or wrongly dismiss info but at least you've had a
> chance to consider same. I dismiss the hammer and
> chisel theory based on the elephant carver -
> rightly or wrongly but of course I think I'm
> right. ;)
>
> edited to add
>
> These cut marks from the 33:11 min mark...you
> think primitive tools did this into hard rock?
> [www.youtube.com]
>
> This isn't what one would expect to see using the
> types of saws that people have told me did this.
> It used to be all about the copper with sand
> abrasives...nu huh.

I also noticed on the sidebar of that video is a link to the giant column at Germany's Felsenmeer.
There is some very interesting machine work represented there, some of it strikes me as being done by more than one technology (or culture) having its way with those blocks of stone, including direct linear saw cuts as well as wedge cuts. Also note the sharp inside corner at 8:03.

______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 27-Nov-17 15:37 by Origyptian.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1977 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 439 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 120 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 143 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 490 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 475 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 584 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 373 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 387 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 270 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 301 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 310 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 266 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 372 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 476 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 294 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 366 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 335 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 374 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 248 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 291 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 326 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 231 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 232 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 272 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 244 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 342 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 282 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 274 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 309 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 346 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 346 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 383 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 398 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 325 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 347 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 414 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 264 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 372 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 417 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 309 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 463 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 322 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 303 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 265 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 401 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 337 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 393 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 333 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 305 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 285 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 375 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 264 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 345 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 355 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 386 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 328 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 344 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 354 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 282 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 377 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 397 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 431 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 486 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 417 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 366 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 372 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 353 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 391 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 367 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 330 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 361 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.