Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
and that is one difference between you and I, I suppose. There aren't very many natural formations in his videos. Occasional I guess but not many. The majority of the photos are of locations/structures which have been obviously worked on. You can be critical of his videos but why would you do that given that he's only providing pictures of really cool places that, otherwise, you would never really see? It's all about forming your own opinion after all. We don't have to agree on things but these videos should make all of us think about the same questions. who why how ...

my view is that if one knows what to look for - and I've tried to point out things to look for and consider - ...most of this work is anomalous. Have you read what Tsurgi wrote about moving massive weights? There is a reality for moving large stones (let alone lifting them) which existed then as it does now. Trilithon stones should bother people.

Nature may form round stones...but certainly not often. That's not the point. The point is to introduce oneself to new things which may or may not broaden ones personal knowledge base. Rightly or wrongly dismiss info but at least you've had a chance to consider same. I dismiss the hammer and chisel theory based on the elephant carver - rightly or wrongly but of course I think I'm right. ;)

edited to add

These cut marks from the 33:11 min mark...you think primitive tools did this into hard rock? [www.youtube.com]

This isn't what one would expect to see using the types of saws that people have told me did this. It used to be all about the copper with sand abrasives...nu huh.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 27-Nov-17 06:11 by Racho.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1984 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 444 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 124 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 150 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 494 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 479 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 590 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 377 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 391 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 277 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 304 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 317 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 270 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 374 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 481 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 298 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 371 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 339 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 379 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 256 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 296 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 330 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 238 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 237 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 276 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 249 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 345 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 286 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 278 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 312 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 349 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 348 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 389 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 400 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 330 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 350 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 420 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 269 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 374 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 423 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 312 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 466 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 326 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 308 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 269 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 405 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 341 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 397 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 337 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 310 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 289 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 378 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 267 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 349 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 359 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 390 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 332 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 347 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 357 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 284 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 382 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 400 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 433 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 489 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 423 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 368 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 376 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 356 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 396 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 371 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 333 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 364 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.