Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
and that is one difference between you and I, I suppose. There aren't very many natural formations in his videos. Occasional I guess but not many. The majority of the photos are of locations/structures which have been obviously worked on. You can be critical of his videos but why would you do that given that he's only providing pictures of really cool places that, otherwise, you would never really see? It's all about forming your own opinion after all. We don't have to agree on things but these videos should make all of us think about the same questions. who why how ...

my view is that if one knows what to look for - and I've tried to point out things to look for and consider - ...most of this work is anomalous. Have you read what Tsurgi wrote about moving massive weights? There is a reality for moving large stones (let alone lifting them) which existed then as it does now. Trilithon stones should bother people.

Nature may form round stones...but certainly not often. That's not the point. The point is to introduce oneself to new things which may or may not broaden ones personal knowledge base. Rightly or wrongly dismiss info but at least you've had a chance to consider same. I dismiss the hammer and chisel theory based on the elephant carver - rightly or wrongly but of course I think I'm right. ;)

edited to add

These cut marks from the 33:11 min mark...you think primitive tools did this into hard rock? [www.youtube.com]

This isn't what one would expect to see using the types of saws that people have told me did this. It used to be all about the copper with sand abrasives...nu huh.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 27-Nov-17 06:11 by Racho.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1975 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 439 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 119 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 142 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 489 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 471 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 583 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 372 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 386 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 270 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 300 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 310 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 265 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 371 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 476 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 294 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 365 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 335 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 374 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 248 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 288 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 325 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 231 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 231 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 270 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 243 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 341 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 280 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 274 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 309 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 345 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 344 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 380 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 395 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 322 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 343 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 412 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 264 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 372 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 417 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 308 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 462 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 322 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 302 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 265 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 400 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 336 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 393 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 332 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 303 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 284 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 374 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 263 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 342 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 355 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 385 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 326 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 343 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 354 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 280 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 377 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 396 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 431 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 485 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 415 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 365 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 372 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 352 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 391 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 366 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 329 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 360 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.