Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Racho Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you can answer how the Serapeum boxes were
> situated & carved as per Dunn's
> measurements...I'll really be impressed. ;)

Hi Racho

"Chalk and cheese" comparison or.... beach sandstone(claim in vid now clarified as) limestone and granite.

I doubt there is an active Egyptologist on the planet who is unaware of the enigma or questions posed by Serapeum and or Chris Dunns work. Maybe it could be solved by a vid with some melodramatic music and wild 'woo woo' guesswork commentary? Very entertaining for some.

I am glad you noticed the very large (split by column) natural light entrance to the "cave". But it makes for more melodrama if one starts at a little erosion hole though, hey!? Very disingenuous right from the start.

Did you notice Vlad standing at other sites where there was a deep hole trench below his feet. I suggest the area has been bulldozed to the face. See Thanos picture of the buildings, train lines and the manicured surrounds in other parts.

I could go on to give you my take on what could have happened (seems obvious to me) but that would be more speculation on inadequate data and vague unskilled speculation in the first place.
However, I see you now have a gathering of "experts" to help boost the woo factor!

If Putin gave you research funds to solve the story, where would you start your investigation ? What things would you want to discount (* and learn about) before claiming ancient age and unknown technology!?

Cheers for now I leave you to it

Thanks

Edit*



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 14-Nov-17 23:18 by Corpuscles.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1984 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 444 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 124 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 150 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 494 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 479 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 590 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 377 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 391 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 276 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 304 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 317 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 270 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 374 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 481 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 298 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 371 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 339 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 379 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 256 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 296 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 330 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 238 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 237 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 276 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 249 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 345 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 286 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 278 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 312 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 349 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 348 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 389 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 400 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 330 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 350 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 420 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 269 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 374 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 423 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 312 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 466 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 326 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 307 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 269 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 405 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 341 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 396 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 337 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 310 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 289 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 378 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 267 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 349 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 359 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 390 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 331 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 347 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 357 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 284 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 382 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 400 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 433 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 489 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 422 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 368 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 376 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 356 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 396 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 371 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 333 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 364 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.