Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Racho Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you can answer how the Serapeum boxes were
> situated & carved as per Dunn's
> measurements...I'll really be impressed. ;)

Hi Racho

"Chalk and cheese" comparison or.... beach sandstone(claim in vid now clarified as) limestone and granite.

I doubt there is an active Egyptologist on the planet who is unaware of the enigma or questions posed by Serapeum and or Chris Dunns work. Maybe it could be solved by a vid with some melodramatic music and wild 'woo woo' guesswork commentary? Very entertaining for some.

I am glad you noticed the very large (split by column) natural light entrance to the "cave". But it makes for more melodrama if one starts at a little erosion hole though, hey!? Very disingenuous right from the start.

Did you notice Vlad standing at other sites where there was a deep hole trench below his feet. I suggest the area has been bulldozed to the face. See Thanos picture of the buildings, train lines and the manicured surrounds in other parts.

I could go on to give you my take on what could have happened (seems obvious to me) but that would be more speculation on inadequate data and vague unskilled speculation in the first place.
However, I see you now have a gathering of "experts" to help boost the woo factor!

If Putin gave you research funds to solve the story, where would you start your investigation ? What things would you want to discount (* and learn about) before claiming ancient age and unknown technology!?

Cheers for now I leave you to it

Thanks

Edit*



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 14-Nov-17 23:18 by Corpuscles.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1976 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 439 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 120 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 143 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 489 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 475 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 584 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 372 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 387 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 270 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 301 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 310 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 265 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 371 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 476 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 294 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 366 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 335 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 374 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 248 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 291 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 326 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 231 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 232 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 271 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 244 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 342 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 282 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 274 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 309 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 346 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 345 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 383 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 398 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 325 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 346 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 413 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 264 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 372 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 417 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 309 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 463 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 322 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 302 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 265 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 401 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 337 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 393 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 332 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 304 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 284 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 375 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 264 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 344 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 355 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 386 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 327 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 343 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 354 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 282 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 377 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 396 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 431 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 486 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 416 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 366 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 372 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 353 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 391 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 367 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 330 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 361 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.