Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Corpuscles Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Someone has to give them more solid
> > ground (no pun intended) to work on!
>
> All human knowledge is merely theory and always
> has been. "Theory" is not some inviolable
> doctrine that is carved in stone but rather the
> sum total of human knowledge as based principally
> (now days) on experiment.
>
> The lack of solid ground in any endeavor is no
> excuse to begin inventing explanations and
> dressing it up as theory and this is what has been
> happening. Suggesting that the "Great Saw Palace"
> has nothing to do with cutting stone is exactly
> the kind of "science" that has been getting done.
> They postulate all the answers like "ancient
> people were technologically primitive and
> scientifically ignorant" and then ask other people
> to solve all these mysteries for them.
>
> It is archaeology, anthropology, and linguistics
> founded on quicksand and it is not anyone else's
> duty to find solid ground for them. It is THEIR
> job. Get on with it or get out of the way soick
> someone else can.


In a discussion of Stonework, you refer to a lack of solid ground.

forget the 'facinating' ....replace the thought with serendipity


while you are at it please share with us the "solid ground" on which you base your notion of Geyser powered Block elevation


Warw

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1984 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 444 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 124 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 150 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 494 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 480 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 590 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 377 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 391 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 277 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 305 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 318 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 270 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 374 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 481 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 298 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 371 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 339 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 379 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 256 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 297 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 330 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 238 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 237 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 277 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 250 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 346 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 286 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 279 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 313 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 349 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 348 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 389 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 401 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 331 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 350 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 420 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 269 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 375 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 423 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 312 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 466 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 326 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 308 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 270 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 406 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 342 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 397 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 338 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 310 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 290 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 379 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 267 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 349 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 360 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 390 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 332 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 347 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 358 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 284 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 383 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 400 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 434 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 489 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 423 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 369 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 376 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 356 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 396 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 371 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 333 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 364 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.