Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Corpuscles Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Someone has to give them more solid
> > ground (no pun intended) to work on!
>
> All human knowledge is merely theory and always
> has been. "Theory" is not some inviolable
> doctrine that is carved in stone but rather the
> sum total of human knowledge as based principally
> (now days) on experiment.
>
> The lack of solid ground in any endeavor is no
> excuse to begin inventing explanations and
> dressing it up as theory and this is what has been
> happening. Suggesting that the "Great Saw Palace"
> has nothing to do with cutting stone is exactly
> the kind of "science" that has been getting done.
> They postulate all the answers like "ancient
> people were technologically primitive and
> scientifically ignorant" and then ask other people
> to solve all these mysteries for them.
>
> It is archaeology, anthropology, and linguistics
> founded on quicksand and it is not anyone else's
> duty to find solid ground for them. It is THEIR
> job. Get on with it or get out of the way soick
> someone else can.


In a discussion of Stonework, you refer to a lack of solid ground.

forget the 'facinating' ....replace the thought with serendipity


while you are at it please share with us the "solid ground" on which you base your notion of Geyser powered Block elevation


Warw

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1975 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 439 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 119 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 142 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 489 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 471 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 583 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 372 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 386 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 270 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 300 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 310 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 265 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 371 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 476 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 294 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 365 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 334 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 374 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 248 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 288 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 325 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 231 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 231 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 270 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 242 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 341 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 279 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 273 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 309 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 345 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 344 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 379 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 395 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 322 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 343 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 411 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 264 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 371 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 417 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 308 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 462 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 322 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 302 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 265 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 400 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 336 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 392 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 332 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 303 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 284 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 374 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 263 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 342 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 355 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 385 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 326 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 343 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 354 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 280 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 377 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 396 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 431 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 485 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 415 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 365 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 371 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 352 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 391 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 365 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 329 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 360 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.