> There is no evidence that they had the word
> "symbolism" or understood its meaning.
There is also no evidence that they had a word(s) for 'Ancient language" or "Ancient Science" if they did could you show us those glyphs?
They wouldn't even
> understand the concept.
...and why would anyone believe it when you make believe you know this?
Its your cockeyed assumption that people believe you when you say crazy stuff like this.
The pyramid builders
> couldn't have been more different. They did not
> think like we do.
....and again you've made this claim several hundred times but have never written up how you know it - are you lying or admitting its just something you say to try and impress people? We aren't impress we just laugh.
They didn't even have the word
> "thought" and they said understanding arose like a
> lily from under the water.
They didn't have a word for 'duck' in the PT so I guess they didn't exist either huh?