Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cladking Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Origyptian Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > Hawass attributes the warm stone on the east
> side
> > > to be modern cement from 1939 that simply has
> heat
> > > properties that are different than the
> surrounding
> > > limestone rock. Has that fun factoid been
> > > published previously? If not, why not?
> >
> > At least he has the scientific acumen to never
> > have actually said this. He did strongly imply
> it
> > early on or, at the least, propose it as a
> > tentative hypothesis.
>
>
Two more years have gone by and still no update and no admission that he stuck an endoscope in the hole and found natural stone and a fissure. But he did announce that natural stone and a fissure lie behind it and the only way to know this is by putting an endoscope in the hole. The guide for it is even still in the hole! The only possible reason to insert this probe was the discovery of the thermal anomaly way back in 2015. He has made further statements about not releasing data that are inconsistent with current beliefs.
Cement warms as it cures but this CAN NOT account for the thermal anomaly.
How are Peers or anyone else supposed to understand the pyramid and its builders without ALL OF THE DATA? Why is Dr Hawass afraid to release this data? How long will it be before someone takes it to the papers without his permission?
-------------------------------------------------------
> cladking Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Origyptian Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > Hawass attributes the warm stone on the east
> side
> > > to be modern cement from 1939 that simply has
> heat
> > > properties that are different than the
> surrounding
> > > limestone rock. Has that fun factoid been
> > > published previously? If not, why not?
> >
> > At least he has the scientific acumen to never
> > have actually said this. He did strongly imply
> it
> > early on or, at the least, propose it as a
> > tentative hypothesis.
>
>
- “When I examined this area, I found that
> the stone at the east side was placed there in
> 1939 to support this area as restoration, and was
> supported by cement...This is why this area had a
> higher temperature than other blocks,” said
> Hawass."
> [english.ahram.org.eg]
> 3/Heritage/Ancient-Egypt/Void-within-Great-Pyramid
> -of-Giza-not-a-new-discov.aspx
>
Two more years have gone by and still no update and no admission that he stuck an endoscope in the hole and found natural stone and a fissure. But he did announce that natural stone and a fissure lie behind it and the only way to know this is by putting an endoscope in the hole. The guide for it is even still in the hole! The only possible reason to insert this probe was the discovery of the thermal anomaly way back in 2015. He has made further statements about not releasing data that are inconsistent with current beliefs.
Cement warms as it cures but this CAN NOT account for the thermal anomaly.
How are Peers or anyone else supposed to understand the pyramid and its builders without ALL OF THE DATA? Why is Dr Hawass afraid to release this data? How long will it be before someone takes it to the papers without his permission?
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.