Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Ellison Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hanslune Wrote:
> >
> > > ....ah a new place in G1 wouldn't really
> change
> > > anything - it's what might be in it that
> might. I
> > > think we'll have to wait until someone takes
> a
> > > look first. I predict rocks, dust and few
> daubs of
> > > ocher paint
> > >
> > > 'Self-consistent' - an.....dude have you
> looked at
> > > the recent state of the fringe narrative?
> Really?
> > > lol
> >
> > I think rocks and dust are pretty much a
> certainty. lol
> > If it is another GG or something similar, it'd
> be
> > cool to see it unmolested with all the fittings
> > and fixtures still in place.
> >
> > All it would take is a few hours drilling and a
> scope.
>
> How confident are you that they will show us the
> truly original condition and contents when it's
> clear that they won't even allow scientists to
> publish the research that merely speaks to the
> potential utility of a 3D density measurement
> technology...especially after the unexpected
> findings in the QC shafts?

I'm not confident that the 'drilling and scope' will be allowed to show the truly original condition.
In fact with the present hierarchy in place I seriously doubt that any new data will be uncensored or un-surpressed.

Hawass himself has made it clear that that no data should be released to the public without the prior approval of Egyptology. I'm not sure what his definition of the public and egyptology is in terms of specific groups.
Obviously the the science and engineering contingent of the Scan Pyramid project have deemed it necessary to go outside and beyond the above in order to ensure that their discovery reaches a wide audience.

Furthermore SCA representatives have very clearly gone out of their way to attempt to dumb down the discovery.
The SCA being the controlling legal authority we may well see an information lock down in the near future.
There being no mention of the discovery on the SCA controlled official website.

> I'm wondering what Hanslune mean by "the
> fringe narrative". It's not clear whether
> he's referring to any specific alternative
> narrative, or all 637 of them, many of which meet
> or exceed the logical threshold of the mainsteam
> narrative.

I'm not sure either. How many fringe narratives are there? How many mainstream narratives are there?
What is the logical threshold of any given mainstream narrative?
What defines mainstream and fringe, where does the boundary lie, how wide is the boundary?



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 05-Nov-17 14:12 by Jon Ellison.