You talk as if traditionalists knew any of those voids were there all along. Give the guy a break. At least he was open-minded enough to propose that there was something more than what untold thousands of traditionalists missed over many centuries about the truth of what's up there. If you're keeping score, looks like cladking has the lead at this juncture -- one guy after a few years of casual armchair musing.

Even the scientists that did that study haven't pinpointed where that void is yet. Is it above Campbell's chamber? Is it lower, at the top of the GG? Is it angled parallel to GG? Is it angled to the opposite incline of GG? How much east-west tolerance is there in the data? Why not throw stones at Nagoya while you're at it? After all, they're the ones that claimed the expertise in the technology in the first place, and tehy still can't say for sure exactly where or what that void is, and after spending how much on the study so far?

And why not reprimand the Egyptologists who criticize the guys whose expertise lie in the physics of muons, while they (Egyptologists) focus on the languange and religion that have nothing whatsoever to do with these scientific findings?

I can't wait to see how the traditionalists squirm to shoehorn these new scientific findings into the orthodox narrative in an attempt to keep it self-consistent.




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04-Nov-17 05:38 by Origyptian.