Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
David wrote:

<The classic example is that Thom's system 5440 units is hidden in the imperial system by using a unit of 12 inches x 33/34 giving 5440 units in a mile so the case for the MY is somewhat proven. The length of the units decide the outcomes.

i suggested that the canon is scaled to 366.6666r solar days x 360 x 1000 = 132000000 feet 25000 miles. Immediately it must be noted the unit discovered in my first book is 3.6666 feet and i really had no idea that this was in barleycorns it was just an obviously misunderstood use of the imperial system that needed further investigation. It aligns with the canon perfectly. 3.666r x 4 = 14.666r.>

Hi David,

You are probably right about this matter of us all being right, depending on application. Right now though my thoughts on this situation are the ratio relationships between these various systems and applications. Your mention of Ann MacCauly's discovery of an alleged Roman Ft. of 12/(35/34) = 11.65714286 ins. is a new one I haven't seen before till now. But it has very interesting properties. That along with Thom's units expressed in Ft. value as you mention 12/(34/33) = 11.64705882 ins. And my own variant of 12/(36/35) = 11.6666r. ins. I can see each of these ratios in progression stages. Together with 12 x .972 = 11.664 ins. which is the more commonly used calculation of a Roman Ft., mentioned by Michell and Neal. The ratio relationships between these units are what if find most interesting, as the triangular ratio relationship I am most familiar with is the Imp. Ft. to Egyptian being 12 x (64/63) = 11.8125 ins., to the Roman x (80/81) = 11.666rback to the Imp. x (36/35) = 12.

What I find most intriguing at the moment, is that variant of MacCauley's being in ratio to the one I most often use as 11.666 ins. x (1224/1225) = 11.65714286 ins. I have been studying this ratio relationship in various contexts since my last topic post, from my granular acct. System. As I might have already mentioned, a cubic Ft. volume of 1728 cu/ins. x a Wheat cu/in. of 196.875 grs. = 340,200 grs. (Which you might more familiarly notice is twice 170,100). Such that when I multiply the most commonly accepted value of the Roman Ft. of 11.664 ins. x 1701/1700 = 11.67086118, (Ann MacCauley's unit Roman Ft.) Or in ratio to my unit is equal to 11.664 ins. x (4375/4374) = 11.666r. ins. But getting back to the cubic volume weight significance, this cubit Ft. of Wheat grains weighs 340,200 gr. / 5760 gr.(Troy Lb.) = 59.0625 Tr./Lbs. This might not look familiar to some until I divide that value in half to get, 29.53125 Lbs., which also expresses a Lunar Month. in the Egyptian system adopted by the Romans along with their Sothic Calendar system of 4 yrs of 1461 days, consequently renamed the Julian Calendar of 365.25 days.

But even more interesting than that to me now is this same weight value of the cubic Fr. of Wheat grains, expressed by that unit of MacCauley's, is 59.0625 Tr./Lbs x (34/35) = 57.375 Tr./Lbs. Or my curious Egyptian Radian unit once again. Hmm! Things get real topsy turvy in the Volumetric/Weights system, as one type of unit also expresses Linear units via the same numeric values. It is most similar to a checks and balances system, such that if one factor becomes lost or corrupted, (most often the Linear units), it can be corrected by scales of Volumetric/Weight units. So it's no surprise to find A.Thom's Megalithic system expressed as Barleycorn units of .36666r ins. as part of this system also, now that you have presented your findings concerning this. I will be exploring further relationships between these various systems for more coherence factors such as this.

Best regards to you and also Jim,

Stephen

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 5370 molder 27-Sep-17 17:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 1407 molder 03-Oct-17 20:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 1020 DavidK 22-Dec-17 23:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 873 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 16:52
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 656 magisterchessmutt 25-Dec-17 17:20
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 685 DavidK 27-Dec-17 16:42
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 662 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 02:37
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 689 magisterchessmutt 28-Dec-17 05:35
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 708 DavidK 28-Dec-17 14:21
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 589 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 622 molder 19-Jan-18 22:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 562 DavidK 21-Jan-18 22:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 637 molder 22-Jan-18 00:13
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 559 DavidK 22-Jan-18 09:55
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 484 cloister 22-Jan-18 11:01
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 488 DavidK 22-Jan-18 12:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 469 cloister 22-Jan-18 12:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 508 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:15
Stonehenge, Brodgar Ring and Thom 629 DavidK 22-Jan-18 13:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 505 cloister 22-Jan-18 16:34
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 493 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 555 DavidK 17-Mar-18 17:30
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 765 DavidK 03-Jan-18 23:58
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 622 DavidK 05-Jan-18 18:27
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 653 DavidK 05-Jan-18 20:55
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 534 DavidK 05-Jan-18 23:48
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 522 molder 06-Jan-18 01:18
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 607 DavidK 06-Jan-18 09:51
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 735 magisterchessmutt 06-Jan-18 11:56
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 604 DavidK 07-Jan-18 11:14
Re: Michell's Canon of Ancient Measure 639 DavidK 10-Jan-18 14:23
Eclipse Measurements on Salisbury Plain. 619 DavidK 08-Jan-18 22:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 510 DavidK 19-Jan-18 12:47
Extracts from another website 543 DavidK 19-Jan-18 13:31
Re: Extracts from another website 485 DavidK 22-Jan-18 20:31
Re: Duplication of the cube 506 molder 22-Jan-18 23:24
Re: Extracts from another website 560 Dr. Troglodyte 22-Jan-18 23:25
Re: Extracts from another website 570 DavidK 23-Jan-18 10:41
Re: Extracts from another website 503 molder 23-Jan-18 12:10
Re: Extracts from another website 533 cloister 23-Jan-18 14:05
Re: Extracts from another website 565 molder 23-Jan-18 21:52
Re: Extracts from another website 539 DavidK 24-Jan-18 09:59
Re: Extracts from another website 464 molder 24-Jan-18 11:39
Re: Extracts from another website 516 rodz111 24-Jan-18 18:59
Re: Extracts from another website 489 DavidK 24-Jan-18 21:12
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 534 DavidK 24-Jan-18 12:03
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 491 DavidK 25-Jan-18 07:06
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 469 molder 25-Jan-18 12:19
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 482 molder 25-Jan-18 12:36
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 529 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:50
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 468 DavidK 25-Jan-18 13:43
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 531 DavidK 25-Jan-18 09:41
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 477 DavidK 27-Jan-18 12:17
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 631 rodz111 28-Jan-18 09:54
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 477 DavidK 28-Jan-18 20:49
Re: The Saros 592 molder 28-Jan-18 23:13
Re: The Saros 534 DavidK 29-Jan-18 12:25
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 531 rodz111 29-Jan-18 16:38
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 515 DavidK 29-Jan-18 17:07
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 521 rodz111 29-Jan-18 18:04
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 497 molder 30-Jan-18 06:05
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 513 rodz111 31-Jan-18 21:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 489 molder 29-Jan-18 22:32
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 500 DavidK 30-Jan-18 10:06
One last shot 521 DavidK 30-Jan-18 13:40
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 633 rodz111 30-Jan-18 18:11
Whay lies between SH and the GP? 493 DavidK 31-Jan-18 07:00
The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 535 DavidK 31-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 435 DavidK 31-Jan-18 21:12
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 456 cloister 31-Jan-18 21:28
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 482 DavidK 01-Feb-18 08:49
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 517 cloister 01-Feb-18 09:39
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 616 DavidK 01-Feb-18 10:05
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 477 cloister 01-Feb-18 12:01
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 476 DavidK 01-Feb-18 14:44
Re: The Megalithic and Saxon Yard Relationship 502 cloister 01-Feb-18 20:23
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 564 DavidK 29-Jan-18 19:39
The New SH GP calculator 504 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:04
The Basic Model 497 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:40
For Horatech 516 DavidK 02-Feb-18 10:50
Re: The New SH GP calculator 566 molder 03-Feb-18 04:16
Re: The New SH GP calculator 549 DavidK 03-Feb-18 23:28
putting 56 back into the GP using the sekhed 499 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:37
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 512 DavidK 04-Feb-18 10:44
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 613 rodz111 04-Feb-18 13:30
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 521 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:41
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 688 rodz111 06-Feb-18 18:13
Re: putting 90720 back into the GP 594 DavidK 06-Feb-18 22:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 480 DavidK 06-Feb-18 15:56
evidence for use of base 100 at SH and GP 518 DavidK 07-Feb-18 10:49
why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 492 DavidK 07-Feb-18 12:37
Re: why 2.7207 feet per Hugh Franklin? 616 DavidK 07-Feb-18 15:29
Standard cubit 19.8 inches 667 DavidK 08-Mar-18 09:16
The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 650 DavidK 22-Mar-18 10:03
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 608 Manu 31-Mar-18 17:21
Re: The Stonehenge Cubit 20.4 inches 602 DavidK 06-Apr-18 22:26
the Giza Template 592 DavidK 30-Mar-18 05:12
Re: the Giza Template 546 DavidK 14-Oct-18 21:57
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 500 DavidK 12-Oct-18 21:21
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 337 DavidK 16-Mar-19 23:50
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 328 rodz111 17-Mar-19 14:54
Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal 378 DavidK 17-Mar-19 10:38
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.736 imperial inches 337 DavidK 26-Mar-19 15:07
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.625 imperial inches 365 DavidK 04-Apr-19 13:17
Finding the ancient metre in the GP base 39.375 inches 318 DavidK 08-Apr-19 14:22
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.736 imperial inches 142 DavidK 22-Dec-19 18:09
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.736 imperial inches 123 molder 23-Dec-19 10:47
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.736 imperial inches 113 DavidK 23-Dec-19 11:42
Re: Giza Great Pyramid design Proposal the royal cubit 20.736 imperial inches 170 magisterchessmutt 23-Dec-19 12:48
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 294 DavidK 25-Apr-19 21:52
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 304 DavidK 21-May-19 23:59
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 180 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-19 22:24
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 168 molder 23-Dec-19 10:38
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 160 magisterchessmutt 23-Dec-19 12:25
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 120 DavidK 13-Jan-20 15:51
Re: David Kenworthy Cracking the Megalithic Code 160 DavidK 15-Jan-20 22:12


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.