The approximate 38-degree angle is based-upon the Angle of Elevation seen in the alignment of the pyramids. Since they were built to accurately represent Orion's Belt, we can measure this angle in their alignment (which would have been the angle at the time of pyramid construction).
As requested please submit the diagrams of Fairall, Bauval and Petrie to illustrate this point and the correlation with latitude.
You are the one that is confused because you keep saying that I am talking about Precession of the Equinoxes. I am not referring to Precession of the Equinoxes so all your arguments here are invalid.
No. My arguments are not invalid.
You have stated that Precession was accelerated due to Earth being affected by a passing cosmic body. If not Precession of the Equinoxes, is there some new Precession which the Earth is undergoing which has been hitherto unknown.
It would cause Precession that is much faster and much more violent than the slow and gradual Precession of the Equinoxes.
What do you mean it would cause this faster Precession?
All I can gather from your ramblings is that you think that some time around 11000 BC or so, the Earth was affected by a cosmic body which you with no proof have labelled Niburu.
What may have occurred is that a cosmic body may have passed close to the Earth at that time and caused a sudden tilt in the Earth's axis due to magnetic, not gravitational forces. This sudden movement away from and back to 23.5 degrees may have caused changes to sea levels temporarily with resultant impacts upon land.
The Precession theory, climate change, continental drift, tidal changes are purely the result of your imagination.
You may have found a more favorable response to your OP by stating that it was a work-in-progress and inviting discussion rather than spouting off about you having definite proof of this theory.