Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > And now, about the pictures I posted:
> >

> >
> >

Quote
That damage is far too eratic to be the
> > result of water erosion. Water drainage from KC
> > would result in a straight V in line with the
> axis
> > of the Antechamber portal.
> >

> >
> > You don't get it. The water erosion is just
> there
> > where I drew an arrow. It's just the small part
> > with the red dots at the end of the "V". I
> never
> > said that the whole block was damaged by water
> > erosion. You keep repeating it but I never said
> > something like that.

> Sorry, I just don't see that erratic damage as
> indicating any erosion.

I agree which I think would be common sense. You'll also note the angle of the damage points right at the big chunk missing at the top of the right ledge, but regardless, if such significant wear were inflicted on the step by water then where is the corresponding equally significant wear, or any wear for that matter, to where it flowed to, the right ledge, and the floor of the GG not to mention all along its path? We can also see a lot of vandalism damage to the antechamber entrance which was not caused by "water".