Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Again:
Here is the shaft opening taken in the same photo shoot as the one above in 1910 (Edgar Bros):
No "waterfall" here, sorry. Or bat shit. Just scuff marks and chipping.
One thing that is getting washed out in these old B&W photos is the seam that runs right through the shaft block Which we can see depending on contrast lights up bright white including some of the chipping around it:
A picture of the opposite wall taken from the same period before the walls were cleaned of graffiti:
Like magic no "water marks" along the bottom of the walls. Though it stands to reason both shafts would be spewing "waterfalls" of water, even if only just the one we would expect to see the same floor marks on all the walls yet they are clearly not there.
So, what was this again about "undeniable proof"?
Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 14-Aug-17 19:11 by Thanos5150.


One thing that is getting washed out in these old B&W photos is the seam that runs right through the shaft block Which we can see depending on contrast lights up bright white including some of the chipping around it:


A picture of the opposite wall taken from the same period before the walls were cleaned of graffiti:

Like magic no "water marks" along the bottom of the walls. Though it stands to reason both shafts would be spewing "waterfalls" of water, even if only just the one we would expect to see the same floor marks on all the walls yet they are clearly not there.
So, what was this again about "undeniable proof"?
Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 14-Aug-17 19:11 by Thanos5150.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.