Romulus the 2nd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don't believe I'm the first one discovering
> this. Has this ever been discussed before?
> Anyway, this is undeniable proof that the Great
> Pyramid was not a tomb.

Regardless of whether or not it is a tomb, how does this equate to "undeniable proof" of anything other than there are marks in the photograph? The quality of the photograph is poor in which you have no idea what the marks actually are or when or how they got there. Yet from this lone black and white photograph you have proclaimed it as "undeniable proof" pyramids are not tombs?

LARGE PHOTO

Here an idea for you-maybe it's bat shit from all the bats nesting in the shaft for centuries.

Quote

He [Abd al-Latif 12th century] also mentions bats as large as pigeons in the Great Pyramid of Khufu, a theme often repeated by future travelers who entered the pyramids.

Davison reported 16 inches of bat dung had accumulated in the small passage leading to the RC.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 13-Aug-17 16:05 by Thanos5150.