> I don't, and that's my point. My primary interest
> is the original date of that stonework and the
> tools, methods, and reason for achieving it. The
> language doesn't seem at all concerned with the
> original construction of any of that stonework, so
> how does knowing the language help us understand
> the original construction?
> And I didn't only refer to pyramid construction, I
> referred to anything made of stone.
Also it's always best to go back to the primary source. The stonework.