Warwick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Warwick Wrote [to Jon Ellison]:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >
> > > Do you think that stick man indicates that TV
> > > technology was beyond the producers?
> > >
> > > Or was that an example of Primitivistic art?
> > >
> > > "We"........priceless.
> > >
> > > Warwick
> >
> > On the other hand, that stick figure wasn't
> > intended to be part of the narrative within a
> > royal tomb or represent any serious depiction of
> a
> > cultural leader. Rather, it was solely intended
> to
> > depict a fictional character within the format
> of
> > campy entertainment. So then should we also
> > extrapolate that attribute to the use of
> > such primitivistic art as well and assume that
> > those similarly primitivistic Dynastic
> paintings
> > actually are referring to fictitious
> characters?
>
> Of course not. but that didn't stop you from
> responding with a inane suggestion tho did it?
>
>
> Warwick

I'm simply trying to understand the logic of your analogy. My "inane" suggestion, in fact, merely follows your own logic which seems to contradict your previous comments since I'm pretty sure you would deny that those tomb paintings are portraying fictional characters, and certainly aren't meant to be campy entertainment.