Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> On the contrary, it’s Ori Mason making them
> necessary, with his dodgy courtroom tactics. We
> have to keep reminding him what we’ve said, what
> he’s said and what the case is, as he tries
> again and again to put one over on the jury.

This isn't a courtroom, there is no trial, no judge no jury no crime. It's all in your imagination.
It appears your greatest concern is that the reader dislike Ori as much as you do.
And to this end, you will forever make worthless posts under the delusion the readers live in your time warp.

> Some of us have noticed his resort to the “Where
> did I say?” ploy. Were the search functional,
> we could give you a number. Contrary to what you
> suggest, he solicits these strolls through
> (convenient loss of) memory lane.

Some of us have noticed your grandiose use of "liar". If I were obsessed enough to search, and selfish enough to think the readers want to read it AGAIN, I would do as you do - make worthless posts that are of no interest to anyone other than the two who share your insecurities.

> > You are only showing how much you dislike Ori,
> > and we already know that.
>
> You and who else exactly?

That's a stupid question.

> Here’s another link for you not to follow:
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 83655,1085535]http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read
> .php?1,1083655,1085535[/url]
>
> Those who do will find our dissatisfaction with
> “Ori” and his debating tactics explained in
> some detail.

What makes you think others are interested in your "dissatisfaction"? That is one huge self-centered assumption