Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3825 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 624 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 672 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 661 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 679 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 766 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 486 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 584 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 550 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 530 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 443 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 540 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 629 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 505 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 552 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 565 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 480 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 498 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 548 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 519 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 445 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 516 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 487 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 456 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 500 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 527 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 632 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 468 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 613 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 499 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 519 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 466 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 478 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 461 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 522 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 452 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 509 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 559 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 518 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 463 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 450 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 550 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 516 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 474 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 542 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 497 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 477 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 485 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 553 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 435 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 474 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 491 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 414 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 560 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 476 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 626 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 521 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 476 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 483 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 465 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 494 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 620 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 461 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 620 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 516 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 537 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 409 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 593 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 417 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 445 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 509 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 514 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 485 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 372 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 500 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 425 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 504 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 467 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 562 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 506 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 398 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 530 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 447 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 602 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 392 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 537 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 446 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 468 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 461 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 447 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 460 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 547 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 484 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 509 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 419 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 497 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 485 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 409 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 394 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 527 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 510 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 497 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 504 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 464 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 536 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 467 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 523 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 622 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 451 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 508 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 459 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 521 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 556 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 520 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 465 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 606 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 488 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 506 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 503 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 643 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 646 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 695 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 487 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 545 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 551 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 535 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 527 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 495 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 487 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 510 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 502 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 506 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 553 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 546 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 446 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 512 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 571 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 441 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 564 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 502 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 510 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 472 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 599 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 503 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 472 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 458 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 708 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 656 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 416 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 388 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 516 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 460 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 462 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 693 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 526 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 512 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 524 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 616 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 416 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 575 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 465 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 475 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 462 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 435 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 438 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 492 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 548 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 517 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 505 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 493 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 381 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 471 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 553 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 443 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 426 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 436 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 413 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 447 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 501 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 392 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 469 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 394 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 534 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 422 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 453 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 411 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 574 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 480 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 490 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 452 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 482 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 479 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 449 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 545 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 498 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 683 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 468 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 454 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 449 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 489 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 433 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 499 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 477 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 363 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 404 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 452 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 328 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 405 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 585 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 486 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 481 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 492 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 438 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 534 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 404 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 505 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 626 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 513 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 608 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 599 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 460 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 722 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 473 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 441 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 375 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 478 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 423 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 500 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 395 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 386 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 418 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 428 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 479 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 506 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 401 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 450 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 415 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 462 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 488 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 401 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 471 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 378 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 345 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 491 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 466 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 457 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 455 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 450 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 406 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 481 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 468 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 462 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 489 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 436 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 486 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 487 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 446 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 477 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 479 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 458 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 450 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 484 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 526 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 470 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 425 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 426 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 471 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 437 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 558 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 436 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 396 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 476 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 458 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 532 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 450 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 424 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 368 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 390 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 356 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 377 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 267 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 452 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 293 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 383 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 314 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 378 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 359 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 290 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 405 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 450 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 566 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 436 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 286 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 362 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 442 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 250 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 477 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 489 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 522 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 286 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 466 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 582 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 454 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 547 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 341 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 372 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 346 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 363 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 363 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 377 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 288 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 317 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 394 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 400 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 310 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 370 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 544 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 290 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 317 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 461 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 332 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 253 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 303 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 332 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 265 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 435 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 259 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 324 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 322 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 280 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 509 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 275 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 442 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 411 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 377 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 457 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 286 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 389 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 411 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 538 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 348 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 303 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 345 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 444 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 468 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 354 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 272 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 325 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 301 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 342 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 346 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 306 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 367 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 334 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 295 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 439 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 461 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 355 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 384 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 326 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 350 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 414 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 616 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 321 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 453 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 414 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 344 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 368 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 295 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 380 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 347 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 262 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 461 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 239 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 278 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 283 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 446 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 266 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 327 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 380 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 362 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 436 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 334 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 343 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 408 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 411 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 292 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 463 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 321 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 337 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 257 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 335 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 359 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 305 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 271 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 372 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 305 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 411 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 420 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 322 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 429 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 445 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 255 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 371 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 318 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29