Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3901 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 669 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 767 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 739 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 732 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 821 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 529 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 629 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 655 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 570 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 489 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 596 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 705 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 556 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 639 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 609 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 524 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 550 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 629 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 566 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 489 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 560 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 531 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 505 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 612 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 601 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 679 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 550 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 664 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 596 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 577 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 516 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 560 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 514 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 637 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 493 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 556 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 627 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 572 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 589 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 539 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 602 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 559 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 524 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 609 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 550 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 517 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 540 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 598 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 473 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 522 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 538 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 461 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 606 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 528 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 678 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 652 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 555 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 525 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 506 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 538 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 667 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 511 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 663 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 559 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 577 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 453 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 631 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 467 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 483 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 573 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 561 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 536 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 409 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 554 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 471 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 551 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 550 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 602 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 555 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 458 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 579 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 530 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 643 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 441 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 593 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 487 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 527 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 514 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 488 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 543 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 593 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 529 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 551 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 461 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 546 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 535 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 449 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 432 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 615 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 557 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 545 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 542 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 506 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 624 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 513 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 568 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 666 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 495 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 550 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 513 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 612 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 612 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 659 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 539 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 689 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 529 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 552 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 553 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 697 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 710 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 743 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 527 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 601 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 592 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 590 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 583 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 544 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 535 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 597 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 577 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 545 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 594 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 598 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 487 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 577 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 638 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 487 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 604 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 561 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 550 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 511 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 662 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 546 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 516 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 513 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 804 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 714 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 467 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 436 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 566 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 506 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 508 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 743 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 658 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 564 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 566 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 677 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 538 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 673 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 506 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 510 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 509 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 554 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 476 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 472 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 530 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 590 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 552 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 546 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 536 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 507 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 595 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 495 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 469 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 475 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 497 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 481 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 536 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 505 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 583 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 461 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 489 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 445 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 617 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 516 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 529 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 490 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 520 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 519 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 487 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 588 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 537 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 781 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 556 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 498 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 519 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 528 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 477 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 537 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 525 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 404 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 437 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 488 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 365 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 460 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 436 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 636 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 552 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 551 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 545 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 488 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 571 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 445 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 542 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 711 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 550 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 660 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 643 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 549 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 771 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 510 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 486 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 413 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 513 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 466 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 536 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 437 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 421 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 449 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 478 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 529 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 553 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 438 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 482 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 490 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 497 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 434 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 525 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 437 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 516 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 380 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 546 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 507 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 497 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 499 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 487 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 511 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 520 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 506 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 500 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 469 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 525 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 509 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 525 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 528 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 488 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 516 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 526 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 498 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 486 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 522 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 587 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 564 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 463 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 466 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 506 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 477 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 597 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 475 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 435 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 523 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 504 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 657 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 504 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 464 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 405 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 428 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 401 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 422 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 338 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 490 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 334 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 415 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 350 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 421 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 347 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 440 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 495 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 604 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 512 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 400 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 397 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 478 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 291 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 515 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 532 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 564 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 327 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 501 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 629 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 490 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 593 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 374 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 411 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 383 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 403 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 410 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 321 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 353 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 442 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 436 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 352 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 404 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 580 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 321 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 364 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 512 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 379 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 286 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 344 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 366 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 307 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 470 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 291 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 359 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 360 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 315 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 550 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 331 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 499 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 535 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 423 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 424 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 495 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 332 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 429 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 449 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 580 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 385 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 338 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 391 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 494 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 522 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 393 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 320 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 356 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 345 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 380 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 387 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 347 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 403 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 372 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 371 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 474 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 549 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 395 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 424 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 362 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 387 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 477 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 686 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 364 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 515 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 454 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 383 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 417 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 337 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 412 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 383 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 301 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 506 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 333 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 344 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 325 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 486 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 304 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 369 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 418 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 401 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 475 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 368 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 377 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 451 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 455 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 326 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 505 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 359 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 375 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 369 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 372 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 396 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 337 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 315 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 410 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 418 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 394 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 515 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 549 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 363 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 466 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 494 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 289 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 415 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 481 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 396 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29