Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3769 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 588 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 623 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 621 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 645 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 724 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 447 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 545 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 513 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 496 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 410 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 510 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 570 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 473 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 517 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 515 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 444 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 460 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 517 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 480 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 410 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 488 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 453 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 425 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 464 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 496 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 591 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 433 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 570 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 468 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 485 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 431 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 445 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 428 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 483 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 416 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 466 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 520 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 480 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 424 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 412 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 520 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 480 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 441 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 513 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 460 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 433 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 450 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 519 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 407 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 435 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 457 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 379 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 528 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 438 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 593 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 449 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 443 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 448 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 438 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 454 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 589 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 427 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 577 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 477 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 506 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 382 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 560 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 386 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 409 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 433 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 477 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 453 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 338 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 467 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 391 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 460 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 425 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 521 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 471 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 363 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 497 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 413 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 566 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 359 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 505 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 412 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 433 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 427 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 419 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 424 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 506 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 449 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 470 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 380 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 467 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 449 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 381 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 365 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 493 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 474 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 455 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 471 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 432 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 497 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 431 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 486 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 579 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 410 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 474 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 424 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 490 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 515 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 485 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 432 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 563 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 456 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 467 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 462 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 609 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 594 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 652 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 453 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 505 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 517 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 502 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 492 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 460 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 456 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 480 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 461 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 466 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 528 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 519 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 417 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 481 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 476 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 413 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 535 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 470 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 471 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 442 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 565 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 466 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 437 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 433 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 618 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 618 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 390 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 352 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 489 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 427 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 437 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 655 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 494 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 478 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 492 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 584 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 386 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 544 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 438 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 448 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 428 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 404 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 409 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 457 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 516 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 486 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 470 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 461 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 352 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 444 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 523 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 413 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 395 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 411 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 386 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 415 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 472 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 363 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 365 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 501 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 393 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 427 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 539 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 446 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 457 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 443 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 449 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 415 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 510 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 468 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 654 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 430 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 415 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 417 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 450 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 403 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 469 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 442 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 333 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 374 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 422 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 301 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 387 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 377 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 554 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 458 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 458 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 455 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 402 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 505 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 369 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 474 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 592 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 481 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 575 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 574 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 430 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 682 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 405 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 349 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 445 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 390 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 468 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 363 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 364 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 383 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 402 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 447 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 473 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 369 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 423 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 378 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 365 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 456 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 372 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 352 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 305 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 466 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 433 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 427 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 422 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 421 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 372 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 454 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 433 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 436 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 402 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 454 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 394 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 458 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 463 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 413 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 456 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 447 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 419 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 414 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 453 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 490 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 443 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 396 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 442 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 520 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 410 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 360 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 437 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 427 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 409 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 385 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 334 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 360 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 325 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 351 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 231 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 418 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 259 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 351 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 283 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 346 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 332 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 255 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 373 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 535 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 403 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 253 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 329 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 412 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 221 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 443 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 457 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 493 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 253 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 434 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 546 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 426 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 514 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 314 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 317 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 332 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 333 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 349 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 253 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 287 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 368 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 371 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 282 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 347 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 513 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 260 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 288 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 424 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 301 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 221 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 267 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 303 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 231 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 225 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 281 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 292 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 253 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 474 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 243 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 381 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 340 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 345 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 427 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 251 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 355 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 376 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 509 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 319 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 271 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 312 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 413 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 427 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 318 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 241 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 288 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 274 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 309 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 309 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 276 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 333 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 308 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 265 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 407 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 396 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 323 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 354 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 299 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 318 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 382 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 580 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 290 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 421 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 387 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 320 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 327 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 257 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 354 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 314 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 230 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 432 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 214 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 240 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 255 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 411 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 233 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 296 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 336 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 326 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 412 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 302 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 315 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 377 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 379 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 260 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 435 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 292 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 312 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 226 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 304 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 330 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 276 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 239 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 337 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 357 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 281 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 379 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 390 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 291 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 400 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 416 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 224 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 344 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 382 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 288 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29