Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3803 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 618 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 665 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 651 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 669 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 756 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 476 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 574 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 542 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 518 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 437 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 533 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 603 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 499 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 544 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 553 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 471 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 486 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 541 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 509 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 437 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 508 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 480 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 449 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 491 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 520 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 624 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 460 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 599 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 491 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 511 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 455 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 469 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 453 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 512 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 443 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 501 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 551 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 512 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 453 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 440 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 542 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 506 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 465 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 533 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 490 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 464 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 474 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 547 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 428 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 466 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 481 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 405 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 553 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 463 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 615 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 488 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 470 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 474 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 457 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 484 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 613 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 453 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 608 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 505 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 527 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 403 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 587 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 408 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 435 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 476 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 507 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 477 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 360 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 490 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 411 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 496 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 458 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 551 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 496 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 389 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 520 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 440 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 592 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 381 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 528 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 439 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 457 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 453 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 441 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 453 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 538 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 475 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 500 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 410 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 488 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 478 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 403 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 385 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 519 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 497 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 486 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 498 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 456 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 529 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 459 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 514 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 611 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 442 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 501 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 450 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 512 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 547 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 510 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 455 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 599 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 479 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 497 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 494 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 631 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 636 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 684 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 479 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 532 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 541 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 527 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 520 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 486 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 481 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 501 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 492 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 495 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 547 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 539 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 440 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 505 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 541 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 432 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 555 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 494 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 500 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 464 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 584 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 496 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 465 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 453 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 662 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 644 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 410 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 382 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 507 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 451 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 456 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 683 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 518 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 501 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 516 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 606 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 407 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 568 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 458 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 469 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 454 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 429 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 424 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 433 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 484 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 539 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 508 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 496 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 486 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 376 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 463 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 544 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 434 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 421 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 428 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 407 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 437 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 494 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 385 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 463 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 386 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 526 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 415 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 446 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 404 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 562 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 472 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 482 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 443 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 477 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 471 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 440 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 535 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 491 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 676 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 457 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 446 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 441 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 480 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 428 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 493 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 468 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 356 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 399 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 442 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 322 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 409 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 400 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 575 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 479 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 477 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 484 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 430 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 528 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 495 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 614 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 504 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 603 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 593 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 453 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 716 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 463 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 369 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 472 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 415 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 493 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 387 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 381 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 410 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 420 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 471 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 499 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 392 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 442 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 407 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 455 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 391 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 481 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 391 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 457 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 370 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 339 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 484 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 461 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 450 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 448 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 443 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 398 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 475 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 462 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 456 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 424 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 479 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 427 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 479 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 481 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 439 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 472 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 467 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 450 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 442 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 477 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 516 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 466 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 419 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 420 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 461 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 428 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 547 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 429 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 385 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 466 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 450 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 501 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 439 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 418 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 360 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 384 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 348 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 371 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 261 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 444 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 287 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 375 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 310 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 371 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 353 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 279 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 399 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 442 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 558 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 428 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 277 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 356 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 435 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 244 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 468 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 483 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 518 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 276 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 460 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 574 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 447 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 539 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 336 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 364 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 341 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 357 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 358 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 372 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 281 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 307 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 386 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 390 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 301 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 365 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 539 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 282 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 310 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 452 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 326 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 243 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 296 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 325 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 256 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 426 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 253 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 313 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 315 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 273 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 502 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 269 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 433 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 405 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 371 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 370 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 450 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 281 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 379 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 406 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 533 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 341 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 296 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 337 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 435 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 461 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 349 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 264 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 316 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 293 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 336 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 339 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 299 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 360 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 329 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 290 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 430 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 444 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 347 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 376 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 320 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 342 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 406 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 608 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 313 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 444 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 407 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 338 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 356 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 289 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 374 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 339 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 256 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 454 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 233 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 272 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 274 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 441 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 258 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 319 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 372 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 353 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 431 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 326 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 339 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 398 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 402 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 283 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 455 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 311 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 331 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 248 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 325 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 354 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 294 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 263 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 360 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 373 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 301 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 403 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 415 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 314 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 425 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 437 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 249 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 363 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 411 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 314 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29