Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Of course, I've known about Pregnant Woman
> since I
> > was a child.
And (presumably) like many
> others
> > here, I accepted the traditional narrative that
> it
> > was created during the Roman Empire.
>
> Oh, dear. So its not enough that you knew about
> Baalbek before you got here a few years ago, but
> unlike 99% of the rest of the population in the
> late 1950's early 1960's, let alone today, not
> only "of course" did you even know Baalbek existed
> as a child, but also, "of course", knew of
> the even more obscure large block sitting in the
> quarry known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman"?
> Well, I knew about it when I was still in the womb
> doctor.
>
> I am curious what black and white TV documentary
> you may have seen such things between episodes of
> Howdy Doody and the Addams Family? Was it the 1912
> National Geographic article that you looked at the
> pictures of before you got to the African boobies
> in the back while waiting in the lobby of the
> doctors office for your mommy that day? Or what
> elementary school textbook would have exposed you
> to Baalbek, the Stone of the Pregnant Woman no
> less, or even the minutia of the Roman Empire for
> that matter? Apparently Fridays were porky pie day
> at your school cafeteria. And "of course" like so
> many other "children" you accepted the
> "traditional narrative" until...
>
> > But only when
> > the new excavations revealed what lies under
> the
> > surface did it become all too apparent to
> > many of us that the Romans didn't
> do
> > that work.
>
> Really? So until these "new excavations" were made
> public in
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,34
> 4707,344958#msg-344958]late 2014[/url], only until
> it was "revealed what lied under the surface", as
> if what was already known wasn't enough, only
> "then" did it become "all too apparent to
> [i]many[/i] [note his use of italics to stress the
> point] of us that the Romans didn't do the work"?
>
> Not only does this show how little you did know of
> Baalbek at the time, i.e. before you got here, but
> you think that "many of us" were as ignorant of
> such things as you, despite your knowing about the
> Stone of the Pregnant Woman for 50yrs, before some
> of us were even born, that it was only until the
> end of 2014 and these "new" discoveries that it
> became "apparent" to "[i]most[/i] of us" they may
> have not been placed there by the Romans? If by
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you mean yourself, Jon, and
> Audrey, well, maybe you are right, but please do
> not impose your stupidity or inclusions on the
> actual "most of us" who have been at this long
> before your "revolution" began 2yrs ago.
>
> Thanos:
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Temple Mount blocks remind one of the
> blocks at Baalbek, obviously not built by the
> Romans either."[/b]
>
> 2013:
> [b]"The Romans, who did use cranes, did not build
> the platform wall at Baalbek nor is there any
> indication they could regardless."[/b]
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,32
> 8919,329050#msg-329050]2013:[/url]
> [quote]RE:Baalbek, what the primary source Adams
> is suggesting is that the builders constructed a
> platform wall 26' high using blocks upwards of 300
> tons, presumably using the same method as they
> went, then buried the entire structure effectively
> raising the surrounding landscape to the wall
> height which would have had to include an extended
> gently sloping ramp leading to the site where
> eventually they perfectly placed the 800 ton
> blocks. Adams suggests that at least 6
> winch/pulley combo machines manned by 144 men
> would have been required to move one block at a
> time.
>
> So, the questions are:
>
> A) Do Adam's numbers even work out? How many cubic
> feet of earth would have been required to keep
> raising the landscape along with the wall? Where
> was it taken from and where was it dumped when the
> project was completed? Is there even any evidence
> a massive area surrounding the wall was buried on
> purpose, not by sediment, and then cleared?
>
> B) Is there any evidence the Romans, Greeks, or
> Phoneticians ever used this revolutionary system
> before or after and if so why isn't classical
> times littered with 800-1200 ton stones? Why is
> there no record of them using this system to move
> the Egyptian obelisks? Certainly it would have
> come in handy especially given if it can easily
> move 800 ton blocks, 250 ton obelisks would have
> been a snap. But it wasn't for the Romans now was
> it?
>
> C) Why only in this one spot did the Romans
> supposedly do this when such opportunities would
> have been available to them throughout the known
> world? This system would have revolutionized Roman
> construction all over the Roman Empire but it did
> not and what methods they did use are well known
> which this is not included.
>
> D) And given the egos of succeeding emperors,
> wouldn't the impetus be to use this revolutionary
> system to move the same if not even bigger and
> bigger blocks?
>
> E) The Romans make no mention anywhere of how they
> built this wall nor that they even constructed it
> in the first place. Surely such a magnificent
> feat-unique in all the ancient world, surpassing
> even the AE whom they so greatly admired, would
> have warranted some sort of dedication or
> acknowledgement. They did it for every other great
> accomplishment, like moving the obelisks, but not
> this? Surely such a wonderous deed would have been
> celebrated throughout the Roman Empire and
> revolutionized how heavy objects were moved
> inspiring the moving of many others, but instead
> they are uncharacteristically mute. Nothing. If
> the Romans were responsible, which they were not,
> how could this be?
>
> F) If it were the Romans, regardless of the size,
> why did they use such a unique precision and style
> for this one wall at this one place, identical to
> those found thousands of years earlier like in
> Egypt, then never duplicate it again in all of the
> Roman empire? They didn't even come close to
> duplicating it for even anything they built right
> on top of it let alone anywhere else.
>
> I am not suggesting the alternative is ancient
> aliens, but what is clear to me regardless is that
> the foundations in question at Baalbek were around
> long before the Romans and comparable Romanesque
> technology and materials. And even though the
> Russians of the 1700/1800's were able to devise
> ingenious methods using manpower, they did have at
> their disposal the relatively modern materials of
> forged/cast metals to make the tracks, ball
> bearings, winches, pulleys, sculpting tools and
> the like something that the AE for example did not
> have nor did the builders of the foundation of
> Baalbek if placed in their rightful historical
> context.
>
> And while the blocks making up the Trilithion
> weigh approximately 800 tons, the ones still at
> the quarry were in the 1000-1200 ton range which
> the builders were able to quarry, precision cut
> and move their position at the quarry which stands
> to reason they were more than capable of moving
> them to the construction site and placing them
> with the same precision as well. Where is there
> any parallel to this in Roman history let alone
> after what is found in Egypt? And another thing,
> so what if the Romans moved pre-existing 250 ton
> Egyptian obelisks, most of the work was already
> done for them. Show me one example where the
> Romans cut, quarried, and constructed with blocks
> of this size, not the few random pillars mind you,
> let alone the larger 800-1200 ton blocks? And this
> says nothing about the precision the Baalbek
> stones were laid which is not found anywhere in
> the Roman world either. This is called
> context.[/quote]
>
> Gladly, I at least do not belong to this
> "[i]most[/i] of us" you are reffering to.

I really don't have much to add to this, I just wanted to preserve that pearl. However, a few corrections are in order:

[list]1. I knew of Pregnant Woman since I was a child. I did NOT know of the Sanctuary, Temple of Jupiter, or Trilithon until more recently. I learned about that block from my father who was a gentleman and scholar and happened to be interested in various mysteries of ancient civilizations around the world. So you're wrong about Howdy Dooty and Addams Family. You're also wrong about any claim you seem to think I made about being any kind of expert about Baalbek.

2. Regarding your infantile "African boobs" paragraph, your flaming Freudian slip is showing.

3. Before the excavations ensued around Pregnant Woman, it wasn't clear to me whether that block was unfinished, still attached to bedrock, a sole block that was a mistake, etc. After I read about the excavation, I realized there were other blocks peaking out from the surface in that same field as well as other blocks under PW which made it clear to me that not only was PW a separate block, it also wasn't the largest block either since there is a 2000 ton block under it. Also, the excavation made clear that there appears to have been a mud-rock slide that engulfed those blocks, that we don't know how deep it is since it's not clear that the excavation has hit bedrock yet, and that PW and the other long blocks may actually have once stood erect, but the mud-rock flow might have knocked them over such that they are now lying parallel to each other. A couple of blocks that are still standing seem to have had their upper half broken off; it boggles the mind trying to imagine what force that could have been.

4. I said "many of us" but of course, true to form, you morph that into "[i][u]most[/u][/i] of us" so that you can then attempt to insult me on the basis of the figment of your own imagination. [/list]

You're a runaway train.
Watch your speed, Casey.

______________________________________________________________
[i]How can any of us ever [u]know[/u], when all we can do is [b]think[/b]?[/i]

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Phyles in the chambers 3854 Audrey 09-Apr-17 03:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 638 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 03:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 690 molder 09-Apr-17 03:51
monster of a paradigm 676 cladking 09-Apr-17 03:51
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 695 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 06:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 787 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 12:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 500 cladking 09-Apr-17 13:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 600 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 14:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 572 cladking 09-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 542 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:33
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 456 Hanslune 09-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 559 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 15:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 666 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 15:32
Re: The Phyles in the cham 520 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:24
Re: The Phyles in the cham 567 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:49
Nix the Spoon 578 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the cham 491 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The Phyles in the cham 521 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 20:14
Re: The Phyles in the cham 564 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 20:33
Re: The Phyles in the cham 535 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:36
Re: The Phyles in the cham 459 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the cham 531 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:19
Re: The Phyles in the cham 502 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:59
Re: The Phyles in the cham 472 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 19:30
Re: The Phyles in the cham 526 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:39
Hint 543 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Hint 648 Audrey 09-Apr-17 22:04
Re: Hint 484 Merrell 09-Apr-17 22:13
Re: Hint 632 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 22:19
Re: Hint 519 Merrell 10-Apr-17 08:12
Re: Hint 543 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Hint 484 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:57
Re: Hint 496 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Hint 483 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:10
Re: Hint 537 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:46
Re: Hint 467 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:01
Re: Hint 524 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Hint 575 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:31
Re: Hint 538 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: Hint 487 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:35
Re: Hint 464 Warwick 10-Apr-17 18:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 565 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 529 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 16:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 486 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 16:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 555 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:30
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 515 Origyptian 09-Apr-17 16:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 489 Warwick 09-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 507 sfbey 10-Apr-17 14:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 564 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 15:40
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 445 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 485 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 18:08
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 505 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 429 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:12
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 574 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 498 Warwick 10-Apr-17 19:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 646 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 20:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 558 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 20:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 493 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:05
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 494 sfbey 10-Apr-17 21:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 480 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:43
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 508 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 21:39
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 637 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 21:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 475 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 21:52
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 632 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 529 Origyptian 10-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 550 Martin Stower 10-Apr-17 22:57
Now the screaming will start 419 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:45
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 607 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 01:14
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 431 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 455 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 538 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 528 sfbey 12-Apr-17 18:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 504 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 18:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 383 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:04
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 516 Origyptian 12-Apr-17 19:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 434 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:11
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 521 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 494 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 574 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 01:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 523 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 02:46
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 416 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:18
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 544 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 16:36
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 463 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:53
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 617 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 10:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 405 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:03
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 552 sfbey 12-Apr-17 19:25
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 462 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 482 Audrey 11-Apr-17 02:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 476 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 460 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 02:41
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 473 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 03:01
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 560 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 08:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 499 Warwick 11-Apr-17 16:55
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 524 Audrey 13-Apr-17 04:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 433 Warwick 13-Apr-17 16:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 512 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 17:20
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 501 Warwick 13-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 422 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:15
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 406 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:24
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 540 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 527 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 17:22
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 510 Warwick 09-Apr-17 17:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 518 Thanos5150 09-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 479 Warwick 09-Apr-17 18:02
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 555 Thunderbird 09-Apr-17 21:34
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 481 Martin Stower 09-Apr-17 21:44
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 537 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:43
Re: To big to fail : ) 637 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 04:35
Re: To big to fail : ) 466 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 12:47
Re: To big to fail : ) 522 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:42
Re: To big to fail : ) 475 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 13:51
Re: To big to fail : ) 534 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 14:10
Re: To big to fail : ) 574 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 15:49
Re: To big to fail : ) 548 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: To big to fail : ) 496 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:32
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 631 Audrey 09-Apr-17 23:37
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 500 cladking 10-Apr-17 00:10
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 522 Thanos5150 10-Apr-17 01:09
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 517 Audrey 11-Apr-17 00:50
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 665 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 03:16
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 665 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 10:23
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 709 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 16:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 500 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 20:13
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 560 Thanos5150 11-Apr-17 20:34
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 567 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 19:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 553 Jon Ellison 11-Apr-17 19:30
FWIW 550 Warwick 11-Apr-17 19:46
Re: FWIW 511 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 21:02
Nothing up my sleeve... 500 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:09
Mumblejumbled numbers 525 Warwick 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 516 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Mumblejumbled numbers 520 Warwick 12-Apr-17 19:11
Re: FWIW 567 Martin Stower 11-Apr-17 22:26
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 560 Thunderbird 11-Apr-17 20:02
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 458 Warwick 11-Apr-17 20:17
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 526 cladking 11-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 600 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:05
Re: Egyptians can move mountains 456 cladking 12-Apr-17 18:28
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 578 Corpuscles 10-Apr-17 03:35
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 514 eyeofhorus33 10-Apr-17 14:06
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 520 Merrell 10-Apr-17 14:58
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 488 Warwick 10-Apr-17 16:48
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 621 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:54
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 517 Warwick 11-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 488 Audrey 11-Apr-17 01:29
Re: The Phyles in the chambers 479 Origyptian 11-Apr-17 02:25
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 741 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 679 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 10:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 439 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 16:51
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 407 Warwick 12-Apr-17 17:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 536 Thanos5150 12-Apr-17 20:15
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 475 Corpuscles 12-Apr-17 22:16
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 482 Martin Stower 12-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 709 Audrey 13-Apr-17 03:54
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 552 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 10:03
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 533 Audrey 14-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 536 Corpuscles 14-Apr-17 23:20
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 641 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 12:12
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 446 cladking 13-Apr-17 13:33
Re: Audrey's thought experiment 588 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 13:48
Your Assumptions Are Showing... 481 cladking 13-Apr-17 17:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 487 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 18:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 475 cladking 13-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 446 Warwick 13-Apr-17 20:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 449 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 449 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 20:46
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 506 cladking 13-Apr-17 20:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 565 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 531 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 523 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 22:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 509 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 21:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 394 cladking 13-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 484 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 21:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 569 R Avry Wilson 13-Apr-17 22:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 459 cladking 13-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 441 Origyptian 13-Apr-17 23:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 453 Martin Stower 13-Apr-17 23:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 430 Corpuscles 13-Apr-17 23:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 458 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 00:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 515 cladking 14-Apr-17 00:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 407 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 483 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 411 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 552 Tommi 18-Apr-17 17:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 436 cladking 18-Apr-17 19:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 467 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 19:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 424 Warwick 17-Apr-17 21:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 594 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 493 Audrey 14-Apr-17 01:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 504 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 01:54
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 467 Audrey 14-Apr-17 02:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 494 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 492 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 03:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 461 Audrey 14-Apr-17 04:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 561 R Avry Wilson 14-Apr-17 07:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 514 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 11:08
Devil's Advocate: 698 WonderWho 14-Apr-17 11:52
Re: Devil's Advocate: 495 M. J. Thomas 14-Apr-17 18:59
Re: Devil's Advocate: 472 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 22:54
re names 470 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 505 cladking 14-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 446 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 10:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 513 cladking 14-Apr-17 15:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 497 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 20:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 377 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 Warwick 17-Apr-17 16:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 465 cladking 17-Apr-17 19:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 342 cladking 14-Apr-17 02:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 434 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 16:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 417 cladking 14-Apr-17 17:33
Philip, the time waster 599 R Avry Wilson 15-Apr-17 00:42
Re: Philip, the time waster 506 cladking 15-Apr-17 01:38
Re: Philip, the time waster 496 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 21:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 509 Thanos5150 14-Apr-17 18:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 462 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 20:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 549 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 22:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 420 Origyptian 14-Apr-17 22:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 516 Martin Stower 14-Apr-17 23:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 656 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 01:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 528 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 09:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 625 Thanos5150 15-Apr-17 17:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 613 Origyptian 15-Apr-17 19:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 484 Martin Stower 15-Apr-17 20:51
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 740 Thanos5150 16-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 487 Origyptian 16-Apr-17 18:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 456 eyeofhorus33 16-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 388 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 491 Martin Stower 16-Apr-17 22:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 440 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 514 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 01:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 408 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 401 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 430 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 440 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 13:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 495 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 13:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 519 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 14:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 415 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 461 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 432 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 474 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 16:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 412 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 17:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 504 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 18:14
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 412 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 18:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 486 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 18:58
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 393 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 357 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 20:48
Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 503 Corpuscles 17-Apr-17 23:12
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 480 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 03:46
Re: Ori goes to a classy restaurant! 472 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 471 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 00:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 466 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 04:04
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 422 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 11:23
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 495 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 13:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 482 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 13:42
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 477 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 446 Audrey 19-Apr-17 00:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 502 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:09
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 449 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:26
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 499 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 01:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 504 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 461 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 11:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 488 Warwick 19-Apr-17 16:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 496 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:36
Agrest and his sources 471 Merrell 20-Apr-17 12:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 463 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 01:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 498 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 537 Audrey 19-Apr-17 02:27
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 481 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 03:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 439 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 04:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 441 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 06:06
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 481 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 15:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 450 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 10:11
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 573 Morten 19-Apr-17 11:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 450 Corpuscles 19-Apr-17 11:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 416 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 494 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 00:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 479 Hanslune 20-Apr-17 02:39
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 571 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 08:09
Roman capabilities 468 Warwick 18-Apr-17 15:37
Re: Roman capabilities 440 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 16:04
Re: Roman capabilities 383 Warwick 18-Apr-17 18:04
Re: Roman capabilities 404 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 18:09
ahhhh. an attack. how droll 370 Warwick 18-Apr-17 20:25
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 397 Origyptian 18-Apr-17 21:27
Re: ahhhh. an attack. how droll 282 Warwick 19-Apr-17 13:49
Stuck in a time warp 464 Audrey 18-Apr-17 03:35
Re: Stuck in a time warp 304 Martin Stower 18-Apr-17 10:56
Re: Stuck in a time warp 394 Audrey 19-Apr-17 01:04
Re: Stuck in a time warp 326 Martin Stower 19-Apr-17 09:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 392 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 16:00
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 372 Origyptian 17-Apr-17 02:25
Experiment terminated 312 Martin Stower 17-Apr-17 12:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 414 Jon Ellison 16-Apr-17 21:37
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 469 Merrell 16-Apr-17 22:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 580 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 03:59
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 449 Jon Ellison 17-Apr-17 08:07
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 300 Thanos5150 17-Apr-17 15:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 378 Warwick 17-Apr-17 22:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 457 Jon Ellison 18-Apr-17 08:13
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 267 Thanos5150 18-Apr-17 18:10
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 490 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 00:41
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 506 sfbey 19-Apr-17 14:30
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 541 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 15:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 301 cladking 19-Apr-17 15:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 479 sfbey 19-Apr-17 15:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 597 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:22
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 467 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 17:35
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 563 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 22:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 353 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:15
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 387 Origyptian 19-Apr-17 23:21
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 361 Warwick 20-Apr-17 16:57
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 376 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 17:18
The Pyramids were NOT a secret 381 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:50
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 388 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:27
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 300 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:11
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 329 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 19:29
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 408 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 22:15
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 415 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:37
Re: The Pyramids were NOT a secret 327 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 08:26
Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 381 Jon Ellison 21-Apr-17 09:20
Mathematical bases of ancient Egyptian architecture and graphic art 556 sfbey 21-Apr-17 14:19
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 299 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:30
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 333 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 19:37
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 480 Warwick 22-Apr-17 15:53
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 349 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:06
Re: Flat, Oblique, Isometric, Single Point Linear, Two Point Linear 264 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 317 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 18:20
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 344 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 279 sfbey 20-Apr-17 19:03
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 448 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:16
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 269 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:31
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 337 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 17:52
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 333 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 18:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 292 Martin Stower 20-Apr-17 19:34
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 522 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 23:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 304 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:19
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 460 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 19:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 427 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 21:47
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 393 Thanos5150 19-Apr-17 22:33
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 393 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:17
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 475 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 17:57
Principles of Egyptian Art 299 sfbey 20-Apr-17 18:49
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 401 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 18:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 425 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:28
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 558 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:24
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 362 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 20:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 315 Origyptian 20-Apr-17 21:29
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 359 Thanos5150 20-Apr-17 23:55
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 458 R Avry Wilson 21-Apr-17 01:32
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 489 Audrey 21-Apr-17 03:02
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 368 Warwick 21-Apr-17 06:38
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 296 Origyptian 21-Apr-17 04:56
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 336 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:36
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 316 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 06:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 355 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 06:44
The willfully blind do not see 363 Warwick 21-Apr-17 07:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 321 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 16:27
Re: The willfully blind do not see 381 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:07
Re: The willfully blind do not see 353 Thanos5150 21-Apr-17 18:12
Re: The willfully blind do not see 307 eyeofhorus33 21-Apr-17 21:15
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 449 Audrey 22-Apr-17 02:29
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 493 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 05:23
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 374 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:13
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 395 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 09:22
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 341 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 366 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 10:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 427 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 11:42
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 638 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 14:02
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 334 cladking 22-Apr-17 14:45
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 468 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:05
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 429 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 15:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 364 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 15:20
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 384 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 15:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 312 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:07
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 391 Jon Ellison 22-Apr-17 16:56
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 358 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 17:33
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 275 R Avry Wilson 22-Apr-17 19:38
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 476 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:46
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 264 cladking 22-Apr-17 19:54
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 291 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:26
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 297 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:17
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 458 Audrey 22-Apr-17 20:36
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 278 cladking 22-Apr-17 21:21
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 344 Origyptian 22-Apr-17 13:51
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 394 Thanos5150 22-Apr-17 16:45
How this is relevant 377 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:51
Re: How this is relevant 453 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 02:09
Re: How this is relevant 348 Warwick 23-Apr-17 15:43
Re: The willfully ignorant do not learn 355 Warwick 22-Apr-17 16:00
Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 426 Corpuscles 22-Apr-17 21:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 430 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 03:39
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 305 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 07:19
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 477 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 13:51
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 335 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 14:38
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 350 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 15:03
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 276 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 22:14
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 346 Thanos5150 23-Apr-17 15:50
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 372 Origyptian 23-Apr-17 16:18
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 315 Martin Stower 23-Apr-17 12:58
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 294 Warwick 23-Apr-17 16:13
Re: Direct questions to self appointed "alt' spokeswoman 385 Corpuscles 23-Apr-17 21:44
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 394 Corpuscles 21-Apr-17 07:12
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 317 Warwick 21-Apr-17 17:43
Rabbits . . . 438 Martin Stower 21-Apr-17 10:04
Re: Rabbits . . . 448 Merrell 21-Apr-17 12:48
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 333 Warwick 21-Apr-17 18:01
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 445 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 20:45
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 462 Audrey 21-Apr-17 01:08
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 267 Jon Ellison 20-Apr-17 19:53
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 388 Warwick 19-Apr-17 17:43
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 441 Jon Ellison 19-Apr-17 18:40
Re: Your Assumptions Are Showing... 330 Warwick 20-Apr-17 17:29