Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > That you would continue to deflect by so
> quickly
> > invoking the Romans as being
> > responsible for the megaliths at Baalbek ends
> this
> > discussion before any more bandwidth is wasted.
> > Thanks for proving my point about how naive you
> > are regarding the nature of aging
> civilizations.
>
> Can you quote in any of his posts here or links
> where he "so quickly invoked the Romans as being
> responsible for the megaliths at Baalbek"? I'm not
> sure what he thinks on the subject, but I fail to
> see where he said what you are saying he did. What
> he did say was:
>
>

Quote

You would have done better to leave Baalbek
> out of this, as all you are relying on in the case
> is your own equivalent naysaying on what the
> Romans could do.

>
> How does this statement equate to him being "so
> quick to invoke the Romans" when what he is
> "invoking" is your standard M.O. of only naysaying
> something to support your beliefs instead of, as
> most normal people do, make an effort to provide
> positive evidence?

He "invoked" it by mentioning it at all. Stop deflecting and speak to the issue of who created those megaliths. Do you know or not? If not, then does this mean the civilization that built them may be "Lost"? What are you getting at with these circular arguments that go nowhere other than you guys trying to deflect away from these gross contradictions in the traditional narrative because you're afraid these alternate notions are actually getting traction?

You say no one cares, and yet here you are prolonging the topic. And that is interesting.