Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > Origyptian Wrote:
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > Martin Stower Wrote:
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Origyptian Wrote:
> > > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > And once again we see a photo bomb with zero
> > > > > evidence of who did the work, or when, or how.
> > > >
> > > > A suitable rejoinder to your no evidence
> > > > whatsoever of a “lost civilisation” so
> > > > much as existing.
> > > >
> > > > Allow me to remind you of the kinds of evidence lacking:
> > > >
> > > > Inscriptions, depictions, tools, potsherds,
> > > > settlements, infrastructure, burials, language,
> > > > script, units of measurement, materials, sources
> > > > of power, transport system, administration,
> > > > ethnicity, clothing, food.
> > > >
> > > > M.
> > >
> > > Which only goes to show how naive you are . . .
> >
> > No, Femano, it goes to show what a liar you are.
> >
> > We’ve been through this before—and here you
> > are wheeling out the same rubbish again:
> >
> > http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1078751,1079617#msg-1079617
> >
> > http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1092259,1093024#msg-1093024
> >
> > http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1092259,1093172#msg-1093172
> >
> > I see you’ve added “all those pyramids in China” to your
> > litany of inanity. What kind of tabloid rubbish
> > on them have you bought into, to present them to
> > us as “lost civilisation” mysteries?
> >
> > Endless twisting and pseudo-argument is all we get from you.
> >
> > M.
>
> That you would continue to deflect by so quickly
> invoking the Romans as being
> responsible for the megaliths at Baalbek ends this
> discussion before any more bandwidth is wasted.
> Thanks for proving my point about how naive you
> are regarding the nature of aging civilizations.

Let’s calibrate this. Assuming that a platform with a large classical temple on top of it, in what was a Roman colony, is most likely composed of blocks quarried and placed by the Romans, is “naive”. A Mega Mud Wave is not “naive”—while all of the other points raised have been dodged, in as naïvely blatant a manner as one could imagine.

Readers may have their own ideas on the point proven here.

Added:

Actually, Femano, where did I do any such thing as “quickly invoking the Romans”? What I wrote was this:

“You would have done better to leave Baalbek out of this, as all you are relying on in the case is your own equivalent naysaying on what the Romans could do.”

http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1078751,1079617#msg-1079617

Which remains an objection, whatever the Romans did.

M.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 17-Apr-17 16:17 by Martin Stower.