Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Warwick Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Origyptian Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > > Warwick Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > > > Origyptian Wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Are you just assuming the answer is
> in Klemm & Klemm?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am asserting that this book is the most up
> to
> > > > date, thorough and concise work on this
> subject to date.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Or do you mean if it's not in Klemm, then
> the
> > > > > answer probably isn't known yet?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am asserting that this book is the most up
> to
> > > > date, thorough and concise work on this
> subject to date
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you specifically site what proof there
> is
> > > > > (e.g., cited by the Klemms) that those
> blocks are
> > > > > truly Tura?
> > > >
> > > > Can you read?
> > > >
> > > > I told you about this books months ago.
> > > >
> > > > You constantly ask question that it can help
> you with.
> > > >
> > > > You dispute everything I say
> > > >
> > > > You want me to tell you what the book says
> > > >
> > > > If you don't like what I say it says what
> will you have to do?
> > > >
> > > > Read the stupid BOOK!!! ( I may have mixed
> up that sentence)
>
> OK, have it your way, gloves off…
>
>
> > > Sorry, I'd rather not spend $90 for a used
> copy of
> > > "The Stones Of the Pyramids" (or over
> > >
> [url=https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=s
> earch-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=Stones+Of+the+Pyr
> amids+klemm&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3AStones+Of+the+Pyramid
> s+klemm]$400 new[/url]) just to get one simple
> > > factoid out of it. But I'll certainly remember
> how
> > > you prefer to receive information when you ask
> for
> > > information from others.
> >
> >
> > Get a Library card
> >
> > Do you really believe that these questions can
> be
> > resolved by single isolated factoids???
>
> Yes, a single peer-reviewed paper that reports the
> quantitative analysis of physical properties of
> the stone such as density, porosity, mineral
> composition, and fossil content to prove the stone
> is from Tura would be an excellent factoid that
> resolves the issue. And so my question was whether
> Klemm does include such evidence. That's one line
> item among what surely is a long bibliography in
> Klemm. No need to make it more complicated than
> that.
>
>
> > How you think I prefer to receive information
> from
> > others is frankly no concern of yours.
>
> If you think it’s no concern of mine, then you
> have no standing to complain about my style of
> communication.
>
>
> > You share nothing with nobody
> >
> > You just protest
> >
> >
> > and you are admittedly lazy in your dedication
> to research
> >
> >
> > Besides which I bought Scott's book. and all
> of
> > Robert's and Graham's and Schoch's
> >
> > I've got Alford, Velikovsky, Cayce, Stichin
> >
> >
> > I DO my homework
> >
> > What is your excuse???
> >
> >
> > Warwick
> >
> > Warwick
>
> My “excuse” is that unlike you, I don’t take
> the initiative to brag about how many books I own



Who was bragging? I was pointing out that as a researcher I feel obligated to read that which I tend to disagree with, as much as that which I find informative.


>
> Also, I’m sure you remember that
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,10
> 52847,1053041#msg-1053041]Thanos[/url] had
> recommended where to get a copy of Klemm almost a
> year ago, for [i][u]you[/u]![/i]


So....a colleague brings to mind a book I had been aware of but had not had the opportunity to consider.

I get the book.

I read the book.

I find that the book is as valuable a resource as Edwards, Lehner, Wilkinson, Fahkry, etc etc etc.

I wouldn't attempt to summarise and or cherry pick The Complete Pyramids, so why expect it ?

Besides I am not the one who DOUBTS that the Pyramids are Old Kingdom in Nature, so why should I do your work for you????

FWIW the Book confirms the origin of the Blocks within G1

The fact that it does far more than that can not be summarised

To understand AE Glyphs one must own or have access to a Primer.

Consider this book the best primer of The Provenance of the Stones of the Old Kingdom Pyramids in existence.

How can you begin to argue against that Provenance(which you do here on a constant basis) without, at the very least, reading the book once???????


Warwick


Warwick