Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So until I find out otherwise, I have no reason
> to
> > believe those gables are Tura.
>
> Which just goes to show how entirely removed from
> rationality your mental processes are, as the
> stone came from somewhere and on inspection it is
> unlike the nummulitic limestone of the Giza
> plateau, making Tura front-runner candidate at
> least.

"On inspection" he says, presumably visual inspection, and by whom (Romer?), and under what conditions -- dripping in sweat after a long hard climb?

Here we have a visual inspection, but apparently no quantitative analysis of the sample (other than what Creighton reported by the Germans), limited color photography, no apparent consideration of the real possibility that the blocks may be plaster coated, and no consideration of the effect of artificial lighting. And you consider that flimsy "evidence" in lieu of what could be far more objective evidence, to be definitive enough to even be able to discern a "front runner"? Glad you think so. I'll keep looking for a bit more quantitative proof than the eyes of a sweaty, exhausted Romer holding a flashlight.


> Yes, Femano, go and find out. Stop constantly
> demanding to be spoonfed.
>
> M.

Of course, I've demanded nothing. The truth is that some of us staunchly disagree with many of your perspectives, and all your harassment, insults, and "confidence of your claim" won't change that.




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10-Apr-17 22:16 by Origyptian.