Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Does anyone here have enough of an
> understanding
> > of....
> >
> > Anyone else care to render an opinion?
>
> Would that be "pick up" (collect at store) or
> home delivery (surcharge applies)?
>
> Cladking is likely your "go to" man! He can change
> it into anything you want it to be!
>
> Apart from M Stower, then Avry (R. Avry Wilson) or
> Matt (eyeofhorus33) are your next best bet of
> active posters, but they are unlikely to want to
> help you build bombs to throw back at them!
>
> I am still at the dunce introductory level ,
> working my way through beginners books, that all,
> three have kindly recommended. (thanks again all)
> It isn't anywhere near as easy as you imagine it,
> to be! But if you spent half as much time as you
> spend blathering here on it, you will be getting
> close to knowing in two or three years!

I have allways tried to both follow and give that basic advice, ie

There is a vast amount of raw data out there. While question and answer can come close to explaining basic concepts and conclusions, the smoking guns that so many look for are not there. Unless you deem a massive massive amount of circumstantial evidence to be a gun.

Yet people ridicule my reference to bibliography being the best research tool out there

Why ask for interpretation of a primary source when you refuse to look at those primary sources, or to accept the answers one is given about them?

When I was growing up I used to sit and stare at display cases in the Royal Ontario Museum on a regular basis. I was usually alone. That's when I learnt the most.

Interrogation is not in my opinion, a constructive learning mechanism.


Warwick