Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Jon Ellison Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The question is. Trying to establish whether or
> not the cartouche does or even can extend down and
> behind the granite beam.
> If the limestone sidewall block and thus the half
> cartouche is sitting on top of the granite beam as
> per the Perring drawing. There being, according to
> the Perring drawing no limestone sidewall block
> concealed behind the granite beam. The granite
> beam penetrating the sidewall.
> Why would the AE have painted only the second half
> of a cartouche at the lower extremity of the
> sidewall block?
> According to the Perring drawing.
> Is the Perring drawing accurate?
It may not be:
Also the question of how we read it. Are we shown the granite beams as they meet the side wall, or their highest points?
M.
-------------------------------------------------------
> The question is. Trying to establish whether or
> not the cartouche does or even can extend down and
> behind the granite beam.
> If the limestone sidewall block and thus the half
> cartouche is sitting on top of the granite beam as
> per the Perring drawing. There being, according to
> the Perring drawing no limestone sidewall block
> concealed behind the granite beam. The granite
> beam penetrating the sidewall.
> Why would the AE have painted only the second half
> of a cartouche at the lower extremity of the
> sidewall block?
> According to the Perring drawing.
> Is the Perring drawing accurate?
It may not be:
Also the question of how we read it. Are we shown the granite beams as they meet the side wall, or their highest points?
M.
