Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > > Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > > > Any explanation for why it appears without a phyle name?
> > >
> > > What do you understand by a phyle name?
> > > The ˤprw names in these chambers appear
> > > without phyle names.
> > >
> > > M.
> >
> > Why would this cartouche not have such a name
> > associated with it but others do?
>
> Which others?
>
> None of the ˤprw names in these chambers
> have phyle names associated with them (whereas the
> recorded ˤprw names of Mnk3wrˤ do).
>
> What do you understand by a phyle name?
>
> There are only so many ways of saying it.
>
> M.
I'm referring to the glyphs that follow the cartouches throughout the RCs as discussed in Roth's thesis. That half cartouche isn't followed by glyphs the way the other cartouches are.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 14-Mar-17 14:17 by Origyptian.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > > Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > > > Any explanation for why it appears without a phyle name?
> > >
> > > What do you understand by a phyle name?
> > > The ˤprw names in these chambers appear
> > > without phyle names.
> > >
> > > M.
> >
> > Why would this cartouche not have such a name
> > associated with it but others do?
>
> Which others?
>
> None of the ˤprw names in these chambers
> have phyle names associated with them (whereas the
> recorded ˤprw names of Mnk3wrˤ do).
>
> What do you understand by a phyle name?
>
> There are only so many ways of saying it.
>
> M.
I'm referring to the glyphs that follow the cartouches throughout the RCs as discussed in Roth's thesis. That half cartouche isn't followed by glyphs the way the other cartouches are.
______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 14-Mar-17 14:17 by Origyptian.
