Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Origyptian Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > > Martin Stower Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > > > Origyptian Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > > >
> > > > > If the data does go public, I sure hope
> Egypt's
> > > > > Atomic Energy Authority publishes the
> details of
> > > > > its methodology, . . .
> > > >
> > > > I’m sure you sure hope so.
> I’m sure you sure
> > > > hope you can carry out
> another of your agenda-led
> > > > hatchet jobs on it.
> > > >
> > > > Why else would you be posting this before
> having
> > > > seen anything⸮
> > >
> > > Perhaps the flawed methodology of
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,35
> 1305,351368#msg-351368]previous[/url] RCD
> > > studies has something to do with my concern.
> >
> > . . . says Femano, citing himself, including
> > presumably his admission that he is “no
> expert
> > on C-14”.
> >
> > Oh, so, it’s “concern”, is it⸮ Concern
> > that your line of bull is about to be squashed,
> > more like. Sight unseen, you’re already
> looking
> > for an out, now that Audrey’s ploy of blank
> > denial has failed.
> >
> > Thanks for confirming.
> >
> > M.
>
>
> If you knew anything about scientific
> investigation you'd realize it's not only
> reasonable, but a fundamental [i]requirement,[/i]
> to present the details of the methodology.

rotflmao


of course, of course, that's it. None of us has the foggiest notion regarding proper methodology.

only a poster who NEVER brings forth any evidence of anything would suggest something so incredibly stupid


Warwick