Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Hi ck
As a one-off break of my intention to ignore your attention seeking, non factual illogical trolling posts but ...
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's hilarious how traditionalists see the alts as
> an homogenous group even though we don't agree on
> when, who, how, or why the pyramids were built.
That is because you don't even have a clue, or and solid basis of fact, it is all armchair "expert" guesses and fantasies.
On the other hand people (sometimes described as "alternative") like our host GH have got off their armchair away from the internet, inspected archaelogical sites and observed the process, gathered information, involving scientific disciplines like astronomy, geology etc and present a case that in not all bitchin, nay saying and demanding of others something they are not prepared or capable of doing!
>
> While all traditionalists believe changeless and
> stinky footed bumpkins dragged tombs up ramps in
> about the second week of October in 2471 BC.
>
> The only thing alts seem to agree on is that calm
> level headed discussion centering on facts and
> logic just might determine the nature of the
> pyramids even though Egyptology refuses to do real
> science or methodically apply 21st century
> technology.
>
There is nothing calm or level headed about massive reams of blather of an imagined unsupportable by fact interpretation of AE writing gained from who knows where or how, a seance or massive abuse of LSD or DMT or arsing from brain misfunction personality disorder or abuse of prescribed medication! No facts, no logic!
Nor the obsessive compulsion of irrational multi mention of "stingky bumkin ramps" thingy in every thread (huge number) you attempt to participate in.
Also if you and Audrey are able to anonymously find a proxy ( sheesh they would want to know your internet history) to deliver your substantial funding donation then perhaps you could in some way participate in meaningful science.
I would ask you to address the questions I just raised, except I realise you are incapable of such especially including any logic or verifyable fact. Don't bother your opinion is worthless to me.
Cheers
As a one-off break of my intention to ignore your attention seeking, non factual illogical trolling posts but ...
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's hilarious how traditionalists see the alts as
> an homogenous group even though we don't agree on
> when, who, how, or why the pyramids were built.
That is because you don't even have a clue, or and solid basis of fact, it is all armchair "expert" guesses and fantasies.
On the other hand people (sometimes described as "alternative") like our host GH have got off their armchair away from the internet, inspected archaelogical sites and observed the process, gathered information, involving scientific disciplines like astronomy, geology etc and present a case that in not all bitchin, nay saying and demanding of others something they are not prepared or capable of doing!
>
> While all traditionalists believe changeless and
> stinky footed bumpkins dragged tombs up ramps in
> about the second week of October in 2471 BC.
>
> The only thing alts seem to agree on is that calm
> level headed discussion centering on facts and
> logic just might determine the nature of the
> pyramids even though Egyptology refuses to do real
> science or methodically apply 21st century
> technology.
>
There is nothing calm or level headed about massive reams of blather of an imagined unsupportable by fact interpretation of AE writing gained from who knows where or how, a seance or massive abuse of LSD or DMT or arsing from brain misfunction personality disorder or abuse of prescribed medication! No facts, no logic!
Nor the obsessive compulsion of irrational multi mention of "stingky bumkin ramps" thingy in every thread (huge number) you attempt to participate in.
Also if you and Audrey are able to anonymously find a proxy ( sheesh they would want to know your internet history) to deliver your substantial funding donation then perhaps you could in some way participate in meaningful science.
I would ask you to address the questions I just raised, except I realise you are incapable of such especially including any logic or verifyable fact. Don't bother your opinion is worthless to me.
Cheers
