Mysteries :  The Official forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:

> So you think the location it's found among all the
> other tombs directly around it that point to the
> 4th Dynasty is "irrelevant" as to its provenance?
> Did you ever look to see the artifacts they found
> inside of it as well, or the architecture, which
> maybe is part of all that stylistic "mumbo-jumbo"
> Flentye was talking about? Of course, this is
> meaningless.

> > YOU brought it up as evidence for such. Now you
> > say it's irrelevant. Make up your mind.
> No Audrey. Even Origyptian understands the minutia
> of his familial ties to Khufu is irrelevant
> regarding the provenance of the Merrer diary.

YOU said ....
As you already know, these are not the "only" reasons the papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty, the least of which is Khufu's half brother is also mentioned in detail as an administrator. Again(8-16):

YOU brought it up as one of the reasons why the "papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty". I didn't focus on his family ties, you have. I haven't stressed his family ties, you have.

...the papyri notes Ankhhaf,half-brother of Khufu, was the administrator of the project who is well attested at Giza:

Still waiting for how he is "well attested at Giza". Looks like he was well attested at Giza by Reisner, based on the location of his tomb. You aren't coming up with thing else that 'attests' him. In other words you are going by what Reisner thought was the lay out of the tombs.

> Not really. The only reason you are taking this
> tack is to support Origyptian's argument,

That's really too bad you think so. Your vision is not clear and may be clouded by your anger. No matter how emphatically I deny your assumption, you won't believe it, so it's a waste of time to try to change your mind.

> as usual, that the Merrer diary doesn't belong to the
> 4th Dynasty and contradict any argument against
> it. The lot of you didn't even know who Ankh-haf
> was or his significance in Merrer's diary until I
> brought it up months ago (ignored then), yet now
> all of a sudden you are all over it trying to deny
> Ankh-haf even belongs to the 4th Dynasty?

Because YOU used Ankh-haf as one factor dating the diary.

> > I think the dating of Wadi al-Jarf is
> > circumstantial, not a drop of science to
> support
> > it. It's dated by the Khufu cartouche, period.
> What does the dating of Wadi al-Jarf have to do
> with the dating of the papyri?

Ask Tallet & Marouard, who for some reason title their papers with "Wadi al-Jarf", naming the site where the objects were found.

> So you omitted all the rest, which would be
> all the rest, that directly contradicts
> your opinion on purpose? My bad.

For some strange reason you think I should have posted the whole article. I gave the links so everyone could read it for themselves. Why on earth would I make unnecessary long posts when I made the articles available?
There is no need to post an entire article when the link is given. Then others can find within an article what they think are points to be discussed. If you don't like this technique, that's really your problem.

> You mean like the 700+ samples taken from the
> predynastic through the OK which clearly place
> their provenance in the 4th-3rd millenniums?
> Again, good to know the whole "science" thing is
> finally catching up with you.

They found 700+ samples at Wadi al-Jarf? We have been talking about that site, have you now gone sideways into a different subject?

> > A house of cards waiting for a breeze.
> Whatever you say Cladking.

I'm pretty sure that was my comment that I posted and not Cladkings. Unless ck can edit my posts.

> So I guess this means the tombs must date to the
> NK then. Good work Audrey.

You believe what the Egyptologists say, I'll make up my own mind, if it doesn't upset you too much

> > Now if they only had some proof of who Khufu
> was.
> > And don't give me that 'context' crap. The
> context
> > was gathered after the fact to bolster
> > their guesses.
> Oyyy... Not this again.

It will be "this again" for some time to come. You thought the subject would go away because you & Stower spit on it?

> If this is all you think it is I can't help you.
> No one is claiming the KFC across the street was
> built in the 4th Dynasty-why do you think that is?

Why do you think that's a good analogy?

> The difference is that all it is these
> "others" know (if that) is that it sits next door
> and otherwise know nothing else about what
> connects them. Bravo-got me there. And these
> "others" would include the dynamic duo of who-you
> and Origyptian? Well, hot damn. That may be
> good enough for you, but sure as hell not
> enough for me nor anyone else not named Jon or
> Cladking here I suspect.

Yet you fail to mention anything else that connects Ankh-haf to the 4th dyn.

> Audrey, the new champion of "science". And if RCD
> said it dated to the 3rd millennium then rest
> assured your narrative would only be something
> else to naysay the provenance.

Not at all. I haven't expressed my opinion on when Ankh-haf lived. But evidently we will never know because Egyptology doesn't like to RCD

> Audrey, you cite multiple papers to contradict the
> opinion Ankh-haf is related to Khufu in some way

I DID NOT cite those papers to contradict his family ties. I cited them to show how Egyptology has placed him in the 4th dyn.

> yet ignore the fact not one word of it contradicts
> your greater point that you believe he does not
> date to the 4th Dynasty. You cherry pick-quotes to
> serve your narrative

I DID NOT cherry pick. I know this is one of the frequent complaints you use to invalidate the poster, but I was just the messenger. The articles were made available for everyone to read. I am not about to post the entire article just so you & Stower won't scream cherry picking.

> then ignore the rest in that
> otherwise there is no discrepancy as to the
> 4th Dynasty date of Ankh-haf. But please, quote
> one of your sources that supports this idea.

Why should I? The point is Egyptology says he is 4th dyn. It's not my job to disprove it. I'm only showing that the reason they say so is not based on good evidence let alone science. Why can't you guys understand the difference? It's that same old mindset of - no one can disagree unless they have a better idea.

> So I am to thank you for reciting papers written
> by Egyptologists you cherry pick from out of
> context to support your otherwise unsubstantiated
> beliefs,

Nope, no need to be grateful. And no need to insult the messenger who just happened to not post the articles in a way that would be pleasing to YOU.

> yet if I were to quote them myself to
> support the opposing view then it is I that is
> somehow the lesser for it?

No at all and do not see why you would come to this conclusion. Boy, you're really pissed that I didn't post the entire article.

> I believe that's called
> "irony" among other things, but rest assured we
> can at least count on me to quote them accurately
> and honestly if and when I do.

Yes, Thanos the Savior. How quickly you worked yourself up to that status

> The simple truth is that you are not worth my time
> to write an expose regarding the context of the
> eastern cemetery and interconnectedness of the
> artifacts and architecture that no doubt you will
> surely not understand anyways and argue with me
> about it all the same. I'd say once in a week is
> enough. But since you are the one with such
> doubts, please tell us why the eastern cemetery
> and/or the people found in it do not belong to the
> 4th Dynasty.

Because there is nothing to say they do except location.

> Hint-the big one at the bottom labelled G7510
> would be Ankh-haf's.

I gave the tomb number G7510 in a previous post, but thanks for the help.

> Some quip to follow how it is I who am not
> worth your time? You'd be right.

I don't think like that, so I wouldn't say it. But if that imaginary conversation makes you feel good, go for it.

> Its funny to me though how the lot of you decry
> anything that dates the great pyrmaids to the
> Dynastic period, yet by the same token you equally
> deny anything that dates the 4th Dynasty to, well,
> the 4th Dynasty, as if this period was just a void
> in time. If the likes of Ankh-haf do not belong to
> the 4th Dynasty then I am curious-who did?
> No one? If not then where and who do you think
> they are?

The answer to that is too long to put in a post. It would require a book to answer.

> > There really isn't anything about you that is
> alt.

> If the measure of such is the likes of yourself,
> Origyptian, Cladking et al, then I take that as a
> high compliment.

You're welcome

> Origpytian's attack parrot says what? If by
> "status quo" you mean the truth then yes, I agree.
> Wow, two compliments in one day. Your insults by
> way of saying the opposite of what you know is the
> truth because you think that's what will get under
> the other person's skin the most is quite tired at
> this point.

That's just silly. You're pseudo pyscho babble is what's tiring.

> Though you feel it clever, to the rest
> of us it's just plain dishonest which is a
> reflection of your character, not ours.

You use the word "dishonest" frequently yet how you use it is puzzling. Why call someone "dishonest" if they are posting what they truly believe?

> I fail to see how calling out belligerent
> intellectual frauds for what they are is an
> "insult".

WHO is being belligerent?

> The real insult is that the rest of us
> have to suffer it in the first place.

You don't have to "suffer" anything. You're not a victim. You choose to read and post here. If it's too much to bear, then don't do it. Your choice, no one's forcing you.

> And given
> these are the people you have cast your lot with
> and defend like a rabid dog every day, despite the
> fact I know you know they are full of shit- what
> does this say about you?

I cast my lot with those I share interests with. Unfortunately I did not consult Oracle Thanos for his approval first, who knows all truths and therefore knows who is full of shit.

I don't cast my lot with those who think they know everything.

> It's ok to be
> willfully ignorant intellectual frauds because
> they are on your "team"? Sounds like some of these
> "higher standards" we've heard so much about.

Brother, you're really pissed about nothing. I don't think tirades will further you points, but I could be wrong. Maybe less judgmental emotion and more objectivity would be better for a forum.

This is what I call... stupid; going back and forth trying to reason point by point with one of your tirades. It's got to be boring for the readers. Insult me, call me what your wish, I will not engage in anymore of your tantrums. And I will continue to form my own opinions outside of Egyptology. You can't stop that.

If you want to talk about the subjects, that's great. But the subject isn't ME. The subject WAS Ankh-haf and Wadi al-Jarf, which I think you have now effectively buried

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote

Subject Views Written By Posted
Imhotep 3789 Rofhessa 26-Feb-17 11:39
Re: Imhotep 666 Lee McGiffen 27-Feb-17 12:15
Re: Imhotep 776 Origyptian 27-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 777 Thanos5150 27-Feb-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 638 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 07:53
Re: Imhotep 588 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:34
Re: Imhotep 577 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:26
Re: Imhotep 667 Rofhessa 03-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 505 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 17:04
Re: Imhotep 578 Rofhessa 05-Mar-17 19:14
Re: Imhotep 574 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Imhotep 514 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:30
Re: Imhotep 501 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 525 cladking 28-Feb-17 17:00
Re: Imhotep 609 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:59
Re: Imhotep 618 cladking 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 526 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:46
Re: Imhotep 533 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:08
Re: Imhotep 461 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:47
Re: Imhotep 384 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 21:58
Re: Imhotep 426 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:05
Re: Imhotep 442 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:14
Re: Imhotep 564 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:25
Re: Imhotep 643 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:30
Re: Imhotep 550 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:52
Re: Imhotep 539 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:58
Re: Imhotep 454 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:23
Re: Imhotep 574 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 438 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:09
Re: Imhotep 582 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 598 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:10
Re: Imhotep 501 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:56
Re: Imhotep 548 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 04:30
Re: Imhotep 648 Audrey 01-Mar-17 05:03
Re: Imhotep 550 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 06:36
Re: Imhotep 605 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Imhotep 502 Audrey 01-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 506 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 04:13
Re: Imhotep 473 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Imhotep 573 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 22:39
Re: Imhotep 592 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:55
Re: Imhotep 458 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:43
Re: Imhotep 494 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:07
Re: Imhotep 480 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 559 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:20
Re: Imhotep 579 Audrey 01-Mar-17 04:43
Re: Imhotep 514 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 14:13
Re: Imhotep 642 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:35
Re: Imhotep 512 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 532 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 15:57
Re: Imhotep 619 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 03:36
Re: Imhotep 496 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:50
Re: Imhotep 462 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:33
Re: Imhotep 532 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 565 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:56
Re: Imhotep 441 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:30
The weaselling continues. 436 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:14
Re: The weaselling continues. 559 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 22:26
Re: The weaselling continues. 503 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:51
Re: Imhotep 528 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:21
Re: Imhotep 561 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 15:50
Re: Imhotep 540 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Imhotep 404 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 16:11
Re: Imhotep 430 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:30
Re: Imhotep 537 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 514 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 576 sfbey 01-Mar-17 17:57
Re: Imhotep 524 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:31
Re: Imhotep 469 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 481 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:26
Utterance #373 580 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:52
Re: Utterance #373 504 Corpuscles 02-Mar-17 19:23
Re: Utterance #373 461 cladking 02-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 552 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 526 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Imhotep 433 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 581 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:26
Re: Imhotep 464 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Imhotep 496 Audrey 01-Mar-17 17:07
Re: Imhotep 439 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 474 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:42
Re: Imhotep 558 Audrey 01-Mar-17 18:10
Great Post 544 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:45
Re: Imhotep 519 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 23:05
Re: Imhotep 705 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 584 Audrey 02-Mar-17 06:48
Re: Imhotep 479 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 11:32
Re: Imhotep 442 Audrey 02-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Imhotep 474 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:04
Imhotep's Sandals. 491 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:09
Re: Imhotep 385 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:58
Re: Imhotep 448 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 527 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Imhotep 397 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 392 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Imhotep 604 Thanos5150 03-Mar-17 17:48
Re: Imhotep 577 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 461 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 22:28
Re: Imhotep 490 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 22:48
Re: Imhotep 457 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 00:18
Re: Imhotep 377 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 471 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 03:38
Re: Imhotep 646 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 02:33
Re: Imhotep 660 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 04:34
Re: Imhotep 550 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:55
Re: Imhotep 503 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:28
Re: Imhotep 705 Audrey 04-Mar-17 07:43
Re: Imhotep 651 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 22:59
Re: Imhotep 497 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:05
Re: Imhotep 386 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:00
Re: Imhotep 679 Audrey 05-Mar-17 04:56
Re: Imhotep 411 Origyptian 05-Mar-17 05:32
Re: Imhotep 537 Audrey 05-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 629 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 06:23
Re: Imhotep 478 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 513 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 16:14
Re: Imhotep 667 Audrey 06-Mar-17 02:50
Re: Imhotep 536 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 05:38
Re: Imhotep 536 R Avry Wilson 06-Mar-17 07:06
Re: Imhotep 645 DUNE 06-Mar-17 14:49
Re: Imhotep 477 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 20:33
Re: Imhotep 442 DUNE 06-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Imhotep 579 Origyptian 06-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 391 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:17
Re: Imhotep 394 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 569 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 23:32
Re: Imhotep 541 DUNE 06-Mar-17 23:56
Re: Imhotep 442 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 00:27
Re: Imhotep 433 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:07
Re: Imhotep 420 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:16
Re: Imhotep 832 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:40
Re: Imhotep 538 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:58
Re: Imhotep 532 DUNE 07-Mar-17 16:49
Re: Imhotep 537 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Imhotep 484 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 591 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 02:23
Re: Imhotep 539 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 04:45
Re: Imhotep 538 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 11:11
Re: Imhotep 494 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 13:16
Re: Imhotep 570 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 15:45
Re: Imhotep 510 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 561 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 602 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 377 cladking 08-Mar-17 15:13
Re: Imhotep 621 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 16:29
Re: Imhotep 460 cladking 08-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 550 Audrey 09-Mar-17 01:16
Interpretation vs Communication. 402 cladking 09-Mar-17 14:33
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 449 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 14:55
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 371 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:16
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 479 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 16:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 495 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 15:17
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 489 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:39
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 737 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 533 cladking 09-Mar-17 16:27
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 513 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:47
You Do the Math. 481 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 403 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:10
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 617 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 20:25
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 397 cladking 09-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 485 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 22:11
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 550 cladking 10-Mar-17 01:34
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 466 SandyJesse 11-Mar-17 02:15
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 558 SandyJesse 10-Mar-17 00:31
In order to build the great pyramids... 456 Racho 10-Mar-17 01:14
Re: Imhotep 499 Corpuscles 08-Mar-17 18:18
Re: Imhotep 529 Martin Stower 08-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 486 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 22:53
Re: Imhotep 439 Martin Stower 09-Mar-17 00:33
Re: Imhotep 383 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 03:35
Re: Imhotep 457 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 14:53
Re: Imhotep 378 Audrey 10-Mar-17 00:51
Re: Imhotep 494 Jon Ellison 10-Mar-17 03:42
Re: Imhotep 567 Audrey 11-Mar-17 06:22
Re: Imhotep 624 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 11:22
Re: Imhotep 523 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 408 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 03:25
Re: Imhotep 447 Audrey 12-Mar-17 04:55
Re: Imhotep 563 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 13:14
Re: Imhotep 410 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:12
Re: Imhotep 358 cladking 12-Mar-17 04:03
Re: Imhotep 490 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 04:07
Re: Imhotep 425 cladking 12-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 438 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:10
Who Knew? 414 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:26
Re: Who Knew? 411 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:05
Re: Imhotep 518 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 16:33
Re: Imhotep 502 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 16:53
Re: Imhotep 374 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:30
Re: Imhotep 469 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 07:03
Re: Imhotep 383 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:33
Re: Imhotep 416 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 18:13
Re: Imhotep 414 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 18:53
Re: Imhotep 483 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 391 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 422 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 23:24
Re: Imhotep 473 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 23:44
Re: Imhotep 498 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 01:21
Re: Imhotep 448 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:26
Re: Imhotep 453 Warwick 13-Mar-17 13:53
Re: Imhotep 446 cladking 13-Mar-17 13:59
Re: Imhotep 462 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:16
Re: Imhotep 425 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:26
Re: Imhotep 470 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 372 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:43
Re: Imhotep 457 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 471 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 17:24
Re: Imhotep 439 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:26
Re: Imhotep 401 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:42
Re: Imhotep 491 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 393 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:39
Re: Imhotep 489 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 465 Merrell 11-Mar-17 14:29
Re: Imhotep 438 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:03
Re: Imhotep 394 Merrell 11-Mar-17 15:27
Re: Imhotep 439 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 464 Merrell 11-Mar-17 16:15
Re: Imhotep 423 cladking 11-Mar-17 18:52
Re: Imhotep 425 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 15:53
Re: Imhotep 555 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 17:27
Re: Imhotep 435 Warwick 11-Mar-17 17:43
Re: Imhotep 436 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 20:13
Re: Imhotep 482 Warwick 11-Mar-17 20:34
Re: Imhotep 446 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 00:45
Re: Imhotep 584 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 02:49
Re: Funerary Cult 384 Thunderbird 13-Mar-17 05:02
Re: Funerary Cult 371 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:31
Re: Funerary Cult 353 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 22:04
Re: Funerary Cult 398 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:30
Re: Funerary Cult 397 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Funerary Cult 342 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 02:54
Re: Funerary Cult 403 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 09:23
Re: Funerary Cult 290 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 14:01
Re: Funerary Cult 398 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 21:35
Re: Funerary Cult 309 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 23:55
Re: Funerary Cult 426 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Funerary Cult 452 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 03:26
Re: Funerary Cult 329 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 13:00
Re: Funerary Cult 490 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 13:34
Re: Funerary Cult 402 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 14:32
Re: Funerary Cult 266 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 15:38
Re: Funerary Cult 351 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 16:06
Re: Funerary Cult 373 Corpuscles 15-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Funerary Cult 227 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Funerary Cult 416 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Funerary Cult 374 Merrell 15-Mar-17 21:40
Re: Funerary Cult 274 Origyptian 16-Mar-17 00:12
Re: Funerary Cult 401 Martin Stower 16-Mar-17 00:53
Re: Funerary Cult 259 Warwick 15-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Funerary Cult 347 eyeofhorus33 15-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Funerary Cult 360 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:22
Re: Funerary Cult 294 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:27
Re: Funerary Cult 439 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:48
Re: Funerary Cult 470 R Avry Wilson 16-Mar-17 02:08
Re: Funerary Cult 344 Warwick 15-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Funerary Cult 291 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:19
Re: Funerary Cult 427 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 20:23
Re: Funerary Cult 213 Warwick 15-Mar-17 21:08
Re: Funerary Cult 376 Audrey 14-Mar-17 02:55
Re: Funerary Cult 425 Thanos5150 14-Mar-17 05:30
Re: Funerary Cult 342 Warwick 14-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Half cartouche. 301 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:14
Re: Half cartouche. 346 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 12:43
Re: Half cartouche. 312 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:56
Re: Half cartouche. 289 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 13:37
Re: Half cartouche. 331 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 13:42
Re: Half cartouche. 302 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 15:00
Re: Half cartouche. 270 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 15:52
Re: Half cartouche. 402 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 16:34
Re: Half cartouche. 544 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Half cartouche. 437 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 20:07
Re: Half cartouche. 362 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 422 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:00
Re: Imhotep 421 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:10
Re: Imhotep 444 Merrell 13-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 231 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 306 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 339 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:51
Re: Imhotep 282 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:58
Re: Imhotep 281 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 16:10
Re: Imhotep 337 Merrell 13-Mar-17 18:27
Re: Imhotep 355 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:31
Re: Imhotep 362 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 290 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Imhotep 435 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:17
Re: Imhotep 244 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:50
Re: Imhotep 329 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:57
Re: Imhotep 362 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 280 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:28
Re: Imhotep 331 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 255 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:48
Re: Imhotep 426 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:28
Re: Imhotep 258 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 386 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 228 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:22
Re: Imhotep 308 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 460 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:06
Re: Imhotep 261 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 21:29
Re: Imhotep 314 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:34
Re: Imhotep 287 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 22:01
Re: Imhotep 399 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:41
Re: Imhotep 267 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:43
Re: Imhotep 354 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 12:42
Re: Imhotep 270 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 418 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:02
Re: Imhotep 359 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 433 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 451 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 436 Audrey 12-Mar-17 00:24
Re: Imhotep 405 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 00:55
Re: Imhotep 444 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 01:41
Re: Imhotep 402 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:30
Re: Imhotep 521 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 07:02
Re: Imhotep 346 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 08:49
Re: Imhotep 308 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 320 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 21:10
Re: Imhotep 254 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:02
Re: Imhotep 287 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 22:16
Re: Imhotep 331 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 371 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 04:04
Re: Imhotep 276 Audrey 12-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 349 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 362 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:37
Re: Imhotep 278 Audrey 12-Mar-17 23:58
Re: Imhotep 399 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:20
Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 304 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 19:58
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 400 cladking 12-Mar-17 20:06
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 345 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 248 cladking 12-Mar-17 22:32
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 281 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:38
...In a Million Years. 407 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:36
Re: ...In a Million Years. 242 Warwick 13-Mar-17 17:57
Re: ...In a Million Years. 465 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:33