Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> So you think the location it's found among all the
> other tombs directly around it that point to the
> 4th Dynasty is "irrelevant" as to its provenance?
> Did you ever look to see the artifacts they found
> inside of it as well, or the architecture, which
> maybe is part of all that stylistic "mumbo-jumbo"
> Flentye was talking about? Of course, this is
> meaningless.

> > YOU brought it up as evidence for such. Now you
> > say it's irrelevant. Make up your mind.
>
> No Audrey. Even Origyptian understands the minutia
> of his familial ties to Khufu is irrelevant
> regarding the provenance of the Merrer diary.

YOU said ....
Quote
Thanos
As you already know, these are not the "only" reasons the papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty, the least of which is Khufu's half brother is also mentioned in detail as an administrator. Again(8-16):

YOU brought it up as one of the reasons why the "papyri are dated to the 4th Dynasty". I didn't focus on his family ties, you have. I haven't stressed his family ties, you have.

Quote
Thanos
...the papyri notes Ankhhaf,half-brother of Khufu, was the administrator of the project who is well attested at Giza:

Still waiting for how he is "well attested at Giza". Looks like he was well attested at Giza by Reisner, based on the location of his tomb. You aren't coming up with thing else that 'attests' him. In other words you are going by what Reisner thought was the lay out of the tombs.

> Not really. The only reason you are taking this
> tack is to support Origyptian's argument,

That's really too bad you think so. Your vision is not clear and may be clouded by your anger. No matter how emphatically I deny your assumption, you won't believe it, so it's a waste of time to try to change your mind.

> as usual, that the Merrer diary doesn't belong to the
> 4th Dynasty and contradict any argument against
> it. The lot of you didn't even know who Ankh-haf
> was or his significance in Merrer's diary until I
> brought it up months ago (ignored then), yet now
> all of a sudden you are all over it trying to deny
> Ankh-haf even belongs to the 4th Dynasty?

Because YOU used Ankh-haf as one factor dating the diary.

> > I think the dating of Wadi al-Jarf is
> > circumstantial, not a drop of science to
> support
> > it. It's dated by the Khufu cartouche, period.
>
> What does the dating of Wadi al-Jarf have to do
> with the dating of the papyri?

Ask Tallet & Marouard, who for some reason title their papers with "Wadi al-Jarf", naming the site where the objects were found.

> So you omitted all the rest, which would be
> all the rest, that directly contradicts
> your opinion on purpose? My bad.

For some strange reason you think I should have posted the whole article. I gave the links so everyone could read it for themselves. Why on earth would I make unnecessary long posts when I made the articles available?
There is no need to post an entire article when the link is given. Then others can find within an article what they think are points to be discussed. If you don't like this technique, that's really your problem.

> You mean like the 700+ samples taken from the
> predynastic through the OK which clearly place
> their provenance in the 4th-3rd millenniums?
> Again, good to know the whole "science" thing is
> finally catching up with you.

They found 700+ samples at Wadi al-Jarf? We have been talking about that site, have you now gone sideways into a different subject?

> > A house of cards waiting for a breeze.
>
> Whatever you say Cladking.

I'm pretty sure that was my comment that I posted and not Cladkings. Unless ck can edit my posts.

> So I guess this means the tombs must date to the
> NK then. Good work Audrey.

You believe what the Egyptologists say, I'll make up my own mind, if it doesn't upset you too much

> > Now if they only had some proof of who Khufu
> was.
> > And don't give me that 'context' crap. The
> context
> > was gathered after the fact to bolster
> > their guesses.
>
> Oyyy... Not this again.

It will be "this again" for some time to come. You thought the subject would go away because you & Stower spit on it?

> If this is all you think it is I can't help you.
> No one is claiming the KFC across the street was
> built in the 4th Dynasty-why do you think that is?

Why do you think that's a good analogy?

> The difference is that all it is these
> "others" know (if that) is that it sits next door
> and otherwise know nothing else about what
> connects them. Bravo-got me there. And these
> "others" would include the dynamic duo of who-you
> and Origyptian? Well, hot damn. That may be
> good enough for you, but sure as hell not
> enough for me nor anyone else not named Jon or
> Cladking here I suspect.

Yet you fail to mention anything else that connects Ankh-haf to the 4th dyn.

> Audrey, the new champion of "science". And if RCD
> said it dated to the 3rd millennium then rest
> assured your narrative would only be something
> else to naysay the provenance.

Not at all. I haven't expressed my opinion on when Ankh-haf lived. But evidently we will never know because Egyptology doesn't like to RCD

> Audrey, you cite multiple papers to contradict the
> opinion Ankh-haf is related to Khufu in some way

I DID NOT cite those papers to contradict his family ties. I cited them to show how Egyptology has placed him in the 4th dyn.

> yet ignore the fact not one word of it contradicts
> your greater point that you believe he does not
> date to the 4th Dynasty. You cherry pick-quotes to
> serve your narrative

I DID NOT cherry pick. I know this is one of the frequent complaints you use to invalidate the poster, but I was just the messenger. The articles were made available for everyone to read. I am not about to post the entire article just so you & Stower won't scream cherry picking.

> then ignore the rest in that
> otherwise there is no discrepancy as to the
> 4th Dynasty date of Ankh-haf. But please, quote
> one of your sources that supports this idea.

Why should I? The point is Egyptology says he is 4th dyn. It's not my job to disprove it. I'm only showing that the reason they say so is not based on good evidence let alone science. Why can't you guys understand the difference? It's that same old mindset of - no one can disagree unless they have a better idea.

> So I am to thank you for reciting papers written
> by Egyptologists you cherry pick from out of
> context to support your otherwise unsubstantiated
> beliefs,

Nope, no need to be grateful. And no need to insult the messenger who just happened to not post the articles in a way that would be pleasing to YOU.

> yet if I were to quote them myself to
> support the opposing view then it is I that is
> somehow the lesser for it?

No at all and do not see why you would come to this conclusion. Boy, you're really pissed that I didn't post the entire article.

> I believe that's called
> "irony" among other things, but rest assured we
> can at least count on me to quote them accurately
> and honestly if and when I do.

Yes, Thanos the Savior. How quickly you worked yourself up to that status

> The simple truth is that you are not worth my time
> to write an expose regarding the context of the
> eastern cemetery and interconnectedness of the
> artifacts and architecture that no doubt you will
> surely not understand anyways and argue with me
> about it all the same. I'd say once in a week is
> enough. But since you are the one with such
> doubts, please tell us why the eastern cemetery
> and/or the people found in it do not belong to the
> 4th Dynasty.

Because there is nothing to say they do except location.

> Hint-the big one at the bottom labelled G7510
> would be Ankh-haf's.

I gave the tomb number G7510 in a previous post, but thanks for the help.

> Some quip to follow how it is I who am not
> worth your time? You'd be right.

I don't think like that, so I wouldn't say it. But if that imaginary conversation makes you feel good, go for it.

> Its funny to me though how the lot of you decry
> anything that dates the great pyrmaids to the
> Dynastic period, yet by the same token you equally
> deny anything that dates the 4th Dynasty to, well,
> the 4th Dynasty, as if this period was just a void
> in time. If the likes of Ankh-haf do not belong to
> the 4th Dynasty then I am curious-who did?
> No one? If not then where and who do you think
> they are?

The answer to that is too long to put in a post. It would require a book to answer.

> > There really isn't anything about you that is
> alt.

> If the measure of such is the likes of yourself,
> Origyptian, Cladking et al, then I take that as a
> high compliment.

You're welcome

> Origpytian's attack parrot says what? If by
> "status quo" you mean the truth then yes, I agree.
> Wow, two compliments in one day. Your insults by
> way of saying the opposite of what you know is the
> truth because you think that's what will get under
> the other person's skin the most is quite tired at
> this point.

That's just silly. You're pseudo pyscho babble is what's tiring.

> Though you feel it clever, to the rest
> of us it's just plain dishonest which is a
> reflection of your character, not ours.

You use the word "dishonest" frequently yet how you use it is puzzling. Why call someone "dishonest" if they are posting what they truly believe?

> I fail to see how calling out belligerent
> intellectual frauds for what they are is an
> "insult".

WHO is being belligerent?

> The real insult is that the rest of us
> have to suffer it in the first place.

You don't have to "suffer" anything. You're not a victim. You choose to read and post here. If it's too much to bear, then don't do it. Your choice, no one's forcing you.

> And given
> these are the people you have cast your lot with
> and defend like a rabid dog every day, despite the
> fact I know you know they are full of shit- what
> does this say about you?

I cast my lot with those I share interests with. Unfortunately I did not consult Oracle Thanos for his approval first, who knows all truths and therefore knows who is full of shit.

I don't cast my lot with those who think they know everything.

> It's ok to be
> willfully ignorant intellectual frauds because
> they are on your "team"? Sounds like some of these
> "higher standards" we've heard so much about.

Brother, you're really pissed about nothing. I don't think tirades will further you points, but I could be wrong. Maybe less judgmental emotion and more objectivity would be better for a forum.

This is what I call... stupid; going back and forth trying to reason point by point with one of your tirades. It's got to be boring for the readers. Insult me, call me what your wish, I will not engage in anymore of your tantrums. And I will continue to form my own opinions outside of Egyptology. You can't stop that.

If you want to talk about the subjects, that's great. But the subject isn't ME. The subject WAS Ankh-haf and Wadi al-Jarf, which I think you have now effectively buried

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Imhotep 3939 Rofhessa 26-Feb-17 11:39
Re: Imhotep 752 Lee McGiffen 27-Feb-17 12:15
Re: Imhotep 862 Origyptian 27-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 871 Thanos5150 27-Feb-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 716 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 07:53
Re: Imhotep 677 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:34
Re: Imhotep 652 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:26
Re: Imhotep 751 Rofhessa 03-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 583 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 17:04
Re: Imhotep 647 Rofhessa 05-Mar-17 19:14
Re: Imhotep 649 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Imhotep 597 Rofhessa 28-Feb-17 10:30
Re: Imhotep 591 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 15:05
Re: Imhotep 601 cladking 28-Feb-17 17:00
Re: Imhotep 696 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:59
Re: Imhotep 708 cladking 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 657 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:46
Re: Imhotep 623 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:08
Re: Imhotep 571 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 21:47
Re: Imhotep 470 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 21:58
Re: Imhotep 510 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:05
Re: Imhotep 522 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:14
Re: Imhotep 642 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:25
Re: Imhotep 723 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:30
Re: Imhotep 631 eyeofhorus33 28-Feb-17 22:52
Re: Imhotep 674 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:58
Re: Imhotep 538 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:23
Re: Imhotep 659 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 523 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:09
Re: Imhotep 667 Corpuscles 28-Feb-17 23:08
Re: Imhotep 700 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:10
Re: Imhotep 597 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 01:56
Re: Imhotep 635 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 04:30
Re: Imhotep 739 Audrey 01-Mar-17 05:03
Re: Imhotep 629 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 06:36
Re: Imhotep 693 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Imhotep 592 Audrey 01-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 593 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 04:13
Re: Imhotep 551 Audrey 01-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Imhotep 677 Thanos5150 28-Feb-17 22:39
Re: Imhotep 672 Origyptian 28-Feb-17 22:55
Re: Imhotep 533 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:43
Re: Imhotep 591 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:07
Re: Imhotep 562 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 641 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 03:20
Re: Imhotep 660 Audrey 01-Mar-17 04:43
Re: Imhotep 603 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 14:13
Re: Imhotep 719 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 14:35
Re: Imhotep 601 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 612 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 15:57
Re: Imhotep 707 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 03:36
Re: Imhotep 574 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:50
Re: Imhotep 542 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:33
Re: Imhotep 612 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 683 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 21:56
Re: Imhotep 527 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:30
The weaselling continues. 513 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:14
Re: The weaselling continues. 633 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 22:26
Re: The weaselling continues. 568 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 22:51
Re: Imhotep 612 cladking 01-Mar-17 15:21
Re: Imhotep 651 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 15:50
Re: Imhotep 626 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Imhotep 489 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 16:11
Re: Imhotep 517 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:30
Re: Imhotep 619 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 608 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 667 sfbey 01-Mar-17 17:57
Re: Imhotep 593 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:31
Re: Imhotep 554 Corpuscles 01-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 566 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:26
Utterance #373 660 cladking 02-Mar-17 01:52
Re: Utterance #373 596 Corpuscles 02-Mar-17 19:23
Re: Utterance #373 546 cladking 02-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 630 cladking 01-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 612 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Imhotep 508 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 669 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 16:26
Re: Imhotep 537 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Imhotep 575 Audrey 01-Mar-17 17:07
Re: Imhotep 523 Origyptian 01-Mar-17 17:23
Re: Imhotep 551 cladking 01-Mar-17 17:42
Re: Imhotep 667 Audrey 01-Mar-17 18:10
Great Post 618 cladking 01-Mar-17 19:45
Re: Imhotep 609 Martin Stower 01-Mar-17 23:05
Re: Imhotep 798 Thanos5150 01-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 664 Audrey 02-Mar-17 06:48
Re: Imhotep 568 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 11:32
Re: Imhotep 528 Audrey 02-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Imhotep 562 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:04
Imhotep's Sandals. 572 cladking 02-Mar-17 17:09
Re: Imhotep 582 Martin Stower 02-Mar-17 18:58
Re: Imhotep 528 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 613 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Imhotep 496 Thanos5150 02-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 482 Origyptian 02-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Imhotep 682 Thanos5150 03-Mar-17 17:48
Re: Imhotep 682 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 542 eyeofhorus33 03-Mar-17 22:28
Re: Imhotep 574 Origyptian 03-Mar-17 22:48
Re: Imhotep 525 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 00:18
Re: Imhotep 460 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 557 Martin Stower 04-Mar-17 03:38
Re: Imhotep 737 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 02:33
Re: Imhotep 735 Origyptian 04-Mar-17 04:34
Re: Imhotep 639 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:55
Re: Imhotep 600 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:28
Re: Imhotep 793 Audrey 04-Mar-17 07:43
Re: Imhotep 732 Thanos5150 04-Mar-17 22:59
Re: Imhotep 580 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 01:05
Re: Imhotep 473 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 02:00
Re: Imhotep 757 Audrey 05-Mar-17 04:56
Re: Imhotep 498 Origyptian 05-Mar-17 05:32
Re: Imhotep 716 Audrey 05-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 723 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 06:23
Re: Imhotep 560 Martin Stower 05-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 593 Thanos5150 05-Mar-17 16:14
Re: Imhotep 773 Audrey 06-Mar-17 02:50
Re: Imhotep 622 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 05:38
Re: Imhotep 621 R Avry Wilson 06-Mar-17 07:06
Re: Imhotep 740 DUNE 06-Mar-17 14:49
Re: Imhotep 559 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 20:33
Re: Imhotep 513 DUNE 06-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Imhotep 668 Origyptian 06-Mar-17 21:38
Re: Imhotep 494 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:17
Re: Imhotep 473 Jon Ellison 06-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 664 Thanos5150 06-Mar-17 23:32
Re: Imhotep 621 DUNE 06-Mar-17 23:56
Re: Imhotep 526 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 00:27
Re: Imhotep 519 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:07
Re: Imhotep 493 Jon Ellison 07-Mar-17 01:16
Re: Imhotep 970 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:40
Re: Imhotep 667 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 01:58
Re: Imhotep 633 DUNE 07-Mar-17 16:49
Re: Imhotep 617 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Imhotep 564 Thanos5150 07-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 672 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 02:23
Re: Imhotep 718 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 04:45
Re: Imhotep 624 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 11:11
Re: Imhotep 578 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 13:16
Re: Imhotep 661 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 15:45
Re: Imhotep 600 Origyptian 07-Mar-17 16:44
Re: Imhotep 664 Martin Stower 07-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 686 Corpuscles 07-Mar-17 21:53
Re: Imhotep 467 cladking 08-Mar-17 15:13
Re: Imhotep 722 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 16:29
Re: Imhotep 541 cladking 08-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Imhotep 635 Audrey 09-Mar-17 01:16
Interpretation vs Communication. 481 cladking 09-Mar-17 14:33
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 535 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 14:55
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 441 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:16
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 567 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 16:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 587 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 15:17
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 567 cladking 09-Mar-17 15:39
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 819 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:04
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 632 cladking 09-Mar-17 16:27
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 601 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 16:47
You Do the Math. 550 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:32
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 501 cladking 09-Mar-17 19:10
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 696 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 20:25
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 470 cladking 09-Mar-17 21:22
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 579 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 22:11
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 627 cladking 10-Mar-17 01:34
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 547 SandyJesse 11-Mar-17 02:15
Re: Interpretation vs Communication. 656 SandyJesse 10-Mar-17 00:31
In order to build the great pyramids... 537 Racho 10-Mar-17 01:14
Re: Imhotep 600 Corpuscles 08-Mar-17 18:18
Re: Imhotep 605 Martin Stower 08-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 571 Origyptian 08-Mar-17 22:53
Re: Imhotep 525 Martin Stower 09-Mar-17 00:33
Re: Imhotep 477 Origyptian 09-Mar-17 03:35
Re: Imhotep 522 Jon Ellison 09-Mar-17 14:53
Re: Imhotep 495 Audrey 10-Mar-17 00:51
Re: Imhotep 564 Jon Ellison 10-Mar-17 03:42
Re: Imhotep 644 Audrey 11-Mar-17 06:22
Re: Imhotep 705 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 11:22
Re: Imhotep 598 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:40
Re: Imhotep 502 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 03:25
Re: Imhotep 535 Audrey 12-Mar-17 04:55
Re: Imhotep 740 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 13:14
Re: Imhotep 494 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:12
Re: Imhotep 437 cladking 12-Mar-17 04:03
Re: Imhotep 560 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 04:07
Re: Imhotep 507 cladking 12-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 529 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:10
Who Knew? 483 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:26
Re: Who Knew? 480 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:05
Re: Imhotep 617 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 16:33
Re: Imhotep 583 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 16:53
Re: Imhotep 451 cladking 12-Mar-17 19:30
Re: Imhotep 545 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 07:03
Re: Imhotep 462 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 15:33
Re: Imhotep 502 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 18:13
Re: Imhotep 480 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 18:53
Re: Imhotep 568 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 19:33
Re: Imhotep 476 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 505 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 23:24
Re: Imhotep 555 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 23:44
Re: Imhotep 579 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 01:21
Re: Imhotep 616 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:26
Re: Imhotep 523 Warwick 13-Mar-17 13:53
Re: Imhotep 526 cladking 13-Mar-17 13:59
Re: Imhotep 547 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:16
Re: Imhotep 516 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:26
Re: Imhotep 559 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 453 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:43
Re: Imhotep 534 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:18
Re: Imhotep 543 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 17:24
Re: Imhotep 515 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:26
Re: Imhotep 484 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:42
Re: Imhotep 580 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 20:39
Re: Imhotep 528 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:39
Re: Imhotep 572 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 14:03
Re: Imhotep 536 Merrell 11-Mar-17 14:29
Re: Imhotep 525 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:03
Re: Imhotep 467 Merrell 11-Mar-17 15:27
Re: Imhotep 510 cladking 11-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 549 Merrell 11-Mar-17 16:15
Re: Imhotep 493 cladking 11-Mar-17 18:52
Re: Imhotep 498 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 15:53
Re: Imhotep 624 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 17:27
Re: Imhotep 517 Warwick 11-Mar-17 17:43
Re: Imhotep 517 Origyptian 11-Mar-17 20:13
Re: Imhotep 630 Warwick 11-Mar-17 20:34
Re: Imhotep 554 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 00:45
Re: Imhotep 656 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 02:49
Re: Funerary Cult 456 Thunderbird 13-Mar-17 05:02
Re: Funerary Cult 445 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:31
Re: Funerary Cult 497 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 22:04
Re: Funerary Cult 545 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:30
Re: Funerary Cult 480 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Funerary Cult 413 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 02:54
Re: Funerary Cult 471 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 09:23
Re: Funerary Cult 368 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 14:01
Re: Funerary Cult 471 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 21:35
Re: Funerary Cult 384 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 23:55
Re: Funerary Cult 507 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 01:24
Re: Funerary Cult 547 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 03:26
Re: Funerary Cult 403 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 13:00
Re: Funerary Cult 558 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 13:34
Re: Funerary Cult 485 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 14:32
Re: Funerary Cult 374 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 15:38
Re: Funerary Cult 440 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 16:06
Re: Funerary Cult 445 Corpuscles 15-Mar-17 16:51
Re: Funerary Cult 300 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 17:08
Re: Funerary Cult 487 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 19:24
Re: Funerary Cult 444 Merrell 15-Mar-17 21:40
Re: Funerary Cult 360 Origyptian 16-Mar-17 00:12
Re: Funerary Cult 485 Martin Stower 16-Mar-17 00:53
Re: Funerary Cult 344 Warwick 15-Mar-17 19:01
Re: Funerary Cult 431 eyeofhorus33 15-Mar-17 18:19
Re: Funerary Cult 433 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:22
Re: Funerary Cult 424 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:27
Re: Funerary Cult 519 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 21:48
Re: Funerary Cult 537 R Avry Wilson 16-Mar-17 02:08
Re: Funerary Cult 423 Warwick 15-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Funerary Cult 354 Origyptian 15-Mar-17 20:19
Re: Funerary Cult 504 Martin Stower 15-Mar-17 20:23
Re: Funerary Cult 283 Warwick 15-Mar-17 21:08
Re: Funerary Cult 466 Audrey 14-Mar-17 02:55
Re: Funerary Cult 632 Thanos5150 14-Mar-17 05:30
Re: Funerary Cult 414 Warwick 14-Mar-17 18:12
Re: Half cartouche. 371 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:14
Re: Half cartouche. 420 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 12:43
Re: Half cartouche. 400 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 12:56
Re: Half cartouche. 379 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 13:37
Re: Half cartouche. 415 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 13:42
Re: Half cartouche. 374 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 15:00
Re: Half cartouche. 347 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 15:52
Re: Half cartouche. 491 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 16:34
Re: Half cartouche. 636 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 17:19
Re: Half cartouche. 512 Martin Stower 14-Mar-17 20:07
Re: Half cartouche. 438 Jon Ellison 14-Mar-17 22:50
Re: Imhotep 517 Warwick 13-Mar-17 14:00
Re: Imhotep 499 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 14:10
Re: Imhotep 522 Merrell 13-Mar-17 15:22
Re: Imhotep 311 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:30
Re: Imhotep 460 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:35
Re: Imhotep 423 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:51
Re: Imhotep 367 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:58
Re: Imhotep 362 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 16:10
Re: Imhotep 408 Merrell 13-Mar-17 18:27
Re: Imhotep 439 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:31
Re: Imhotep 435 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:40
Re: Imhotep 358 Warwick 13-Mar-17 18:48
Re: Imhotep 520 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:17
Re: Imhotep 323 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:50
Re: Imhotep 406 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:57
Re: Imhotep 436 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 18:10
Re: Imhotep 352 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:28
Re: Imhotep 409 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 331 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 15:48
Re: Imhotep 498 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:28
Re: Imhotep 331 Warwick 13-Mar-17 16:40
Re: Imhotep 466 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 19:15
Re: Imhotep 303 Warwick 13-Mar-17 19:22
Re: Imhotep 381 Origyptian 13-Mar-17 20:30
Re: Imhotep 550 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:06
Re: Imhotep 330 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 21:29
Re: Imhotep 407 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 21:34
Re: Imhotep 373 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 22:01
Re: Imhotep 475 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 22:41
Re: Imhotep 337 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 23:43
Re: Imhotep 429 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 12:42
Re: Imhotep 338 Thanos5150 13-Mar-17 16:42
Re: Imhotep 506 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 15:02
Re: Imhotep 455 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 512 Thanos5150 11-Mar-17 21:19
Re: Imhotep 605 Martin Stower 11-Mar-17 22:12
Re: Imhotep 525 Audrey 12-Mar-17 00:24
Re: Imhotep 474 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 00:55
Re: Imhotep 546 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 01:41
Re: Imhotep 481 Audrey 12-Mar-17 02:30
Re: Imhotep 606 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 07:02
Re: Imhotep 425 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 08:49
Re: Imhotep 379 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 16:52
Re: Imhotep 395 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 21:10
Re: Imhotep 330 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:02
Re: Imhotep 372 Origyptian 12-Mar-17 22:16
Re: Imhotep 409 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 23:51
Re: Imhotep 437 Origyptian 14-Mar-17 04:04
Re: Imhotep 352 Audrey 12-Mar-17 19:54
Re: Imhotep 422 Thanos5150 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Imhotep 447 Martin Stower 12-Mar-17 22:37
Re: Imhotep 359 Audrey 12-Mar-17 23:58
Re: Imhotep 468 Martin Stower 13-Mar-17 00:20
Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 374 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 19:58
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 477 cladking 12-Mar-17 20:06
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 417 Corpuscles 12-Mar-17 21:07
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 322 cladking 12-Mar-17 22:32
Re: Papyri Wadi el-Jarf 360 Warwick 13-Mar-17 15:38
...In a Million Years. 480 cladking 13-Mar-17 17:36
Re: ...In a Million Years. 310 Warwick 13-Mar-17 17:57
Re: ...In a Million Years. 541 cladking 13-Mar-17 18:33