Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > > Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > > If the data does go public, I sure hope Egypt's
> > > > Atomic Energy Authority publishes the details of
> > > > its methodology, . . .
> > >
> > > I’m sure you sure hope so. I’m sure you sure
> > > hope you can carry out another of your agenda-led
> > > hatchet jobs on it.
> > >
> > > Why else would you be posting this before having
> > > seen anything⸮
> >
> > Perhaps the flawed methodology of previous RCD
> > studies has something to do with my concern.
>
> . . . says Femano, citing himself, including
> presumably his admission that he is “no expert
> on C-14”.
>
> Oh, so, it’s “concern”, is it⸮ Concern
> that your line of bull is about to be squashed,
> more like. Sight unseen, you’re already looking
> for an out, now that Audrey’s ploy of blank
> denial has failed.
>
> Thanks for confirming.
>
> M.
If you knew anything about scientific investigation you'd realize it's not only reasonable, but a fundamental requirement, to present the details of the methodology.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 12-Mar-17 21:34 by Origyptian.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > Martin Stower Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > > Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > > If the data does go public, I sure hope Egypt's
> > > > Atomic Energy Authority publishes the details of
> > > > its methodology, . . .
> > >
> > > I’m sure you sure hope so. I’m sure you sure
> > > hope you can carry out another of your agenda-led
> > > hatchet jobs on it.
> > >
> > > Why else would you be posting this before having
> > > seen anything⸮
> >
> > Perhaps the flawed methodology of previous RCD
> > studies has something to do with my concern.
>
> . . . says Femano, citing himself, including
> presumably his admission that he is “no expert
> on C-14”.
>
> Oh, so, it’s “concern”, is it⸮ Concern
> that your line of bull is about to be squashed,
> more like. Sight unseen, you’re already looking
> for an out, now that Audrey’s ploy of blank
> denial has failed.
>
> Thanks for confirming.
>
> M.
If you knew anything about scientific investigation you'd realize it's not only reasonable, but a fundamental requirement, to present the details of the methodology.
______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 12-Mar-17 21:34 by Origyptian.
