Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > Origyptian Wrote:
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > It's in the translation posted by Thanos which
> > > is from Breasted. So I assume Thanos would accept
> > > that source as a valid translation used in my
> > > reply to him.
> >
> > To labour the obvious, this is not what you said.
> > You said that the inscription “actually”
> > translates to x and y and z.
> >
> > > Your point?
> >
> > That you accept things when it suits you and
> > quibble when it suits you, consistent with your
> > arbitrary approach to evidence overall.
> >
> > Thank you for your cooperation in making it.
> >
> > M.
>
>
> What on earth did I "accept"?
>
> I simply answered the question by stating I was
> responding to Thanos' post which included that
> translation.

Repeat for the remedial stream:

‘To labour the obvious, this is not what you said. You said that the inscription “actually” translates to x and y and z.’

Verbatim:

‘Interesting that you would characterize it that way since the inscription actually translates to Weni only “bringing” those things and not actually quarrying them or manufacturing them (with the possible exception of one offering table, see below).’

http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1092259,1092995#msg-1092995

Where’s the critical distance⸮ Where’s the (ludicrously pretentious) quibbling we see in other cases⸮

M.