Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > Origyptian Wrote:
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > The reason I discard Sitchin is NOT because I
> > > dismiss aliens out of hand, it's because I don't
> > > recognize Sitchin as qualified to identify an
> > > alien presence. . . .
> >
> > http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,334576,334895#msg-334895
> >
> > “I've never read Sitchin. The moment I found out
> > his thesis focused on aliens I discarded any
> > interest in his writing.”
> >
> > Doctor Femano,
> >
> > Your single given reason for discarding any
> > interest in Sitchin’s writing is finding out
> > that his thesis “focused on aliens”.
> >
> > You said nothing about his qualifications,
> > competence, veracity, or anything like that.
> >
> > Stop pretending that what doesn’t suit you now
> > never happened.
> >
> > M.
>
> Stop trying to pretend [sic] you're psychic.
Stop pretending that I’m doing so.
> My posted words are VERY clear.
Yes, they are.
> It's your twisting of them that's creating all the
> knots.
On the contrary, Doctor, I’ve presented them exactly as they are. You’re the one squirming and ducking and diving and pretending that he never said what he very plainly did say.
M.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > Origyptian Wrote:
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > The reason I discard Sitchin is NOT because I
> > > dismiss aliens out of hand, it's because I don't
> > > recognize Sitchin as qualified to identify an
> > > alien presence. . . .
> >
> > http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,334576,334895#msg-334895
> >
> > “I've never read Sitchin. The moment I found out
> > his thesis focused on aliens I discarded any
> > interest in his writing.”
> >
> > Doctor Femano,
> >
> > Your single given reason for discarding any
> > interest in Sitchin’s writing is finding out
> > that his thesis “focused on aliens”.
> >
> > You said nothing about his qualifications,
> > competence, veracity, or anything like that.
> >
> > Stop pretending that what doesn’t suit you now
> > never happened.
> >
> > M.
>
> Stop trying to pretend [sic] you're psychic.
Stop pretending that I’m doing so.
> My posted words are VERY clear.
Yes, they are.
> It's your twisting of them that's creating all the
> knots.
On the contrary, Doctor, I’ve presented them exactly as they are. You’re the one squirming and ducking and diving and pretending that he never said what he very plainly did say.
M.
