Origyptian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Non sequitur. I'm on record here as being
> skeptical about equating Khnum-Khfu with Khufu
> well before SC published his book. Thanos simply
> adds a few more nails in the sarcophagus of the
> so-called well attested titulary.

Hi Ori

You never cease to amaze me. Non sequitur?

Thanos was refering to Djoser and in other places Imhotep and it is a non sequitur to suggest that those comments "adds nails" to your separate conjecture (you brought it up) about Khufu.

I acknowledge (am aware) you have previously raised your conjecture (prior to SC book) but somewhat non sequitur to also concurrently and later endorse a supposed mass forgery (for the purpose of achieving fame/notority of identifing one builder) in one of the several places that all three versions of titulary are found together.

What is your view? Do you think they were co regents? If so, or alternate other, on what basis?

Do you have any solid alt views on anything, or is it simply that everyone else is mistaken but you don't know exactly why and cannot offer coherent basis for an alternative?

Cheers