Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > You might recall my perspective of
> > those RCD C14 studies: They describe very
> > problematic methodology and are replete with the
> > risk of sample contamination due to modern carbon,
> > apparently as a deliberate design component of the
> > methodology.
>
> I also recall my disagreement with this which you
> conceded namely that of the 700+ samples between
> not just two, but 3 studies, all fall within the
> greater Dynastic period.

Well, not exactly. The '95 study systematically showed more recent dating than the earlier study and the authors conspicuously avoided addressing that clear enigma in the dating. LIkewise, all three Gizamids were dated concurrently which is not at all in line with traditional thought, or even in the realm of logic.

By the way, what's the definition of "greater Dynastic period"?



> These studies comprise
> the largest statistical RCD data sample ever taken
> of the ancient world...

Practice makes permanent, it doesn't make perfect.



> ...so despite whatever
> misgiving you may have which quite frankly I do
> not see as objective, unless we are to conclude
> RCD itself is completely bogus (which I don't)...

That strikes me as a false equivalence. There are other possibilities than your simple "unless" clause allows. I've stated on the record that I have no problem with RCD science. It's the misuse of it that I object to.



> ... at large the majority of the samples cannot all be
> "wrong" and not a one pointed to any date outside
> the Naqada period...

Yes, isn't it interesting that a couple were dated millennia earlier. Why do you think that is? Could it be that we, in fact, do NOT know what the "majority of all the samples" showed since a huge fraction of them were not reported, they weren't included in the analysis, no criteria was offered for their omission, and no reason was given for them being put into a "reserve". We only know about the data they chose to report.



> ... Feel free to interpret this how
> you like but unless one rejects RCD as a whole the
> data speaks for itself and should be deemed as a
> credible guide regardless of how one wants to
> interpret its meaning.

That's a contradiction. The data does indeed speak for itself, and from my read, it loses a great deal of credibility because of the methodology chosen by the authors regarding the handling and analysis of that data.



> > I can't speak for anyone else, but what I "want"
> > is simply the truth and not a contrived narrative
> > based on what appears to be arbitrary correlation.
> > In absence of any certainty, at least something
> > that makes the most sense that fits the evidence
> > while avoiding logical contradictions. I don't see
> > star alignments as meeting that basic criteria.
>
>
> > The "effort" I put into this merely revealed to me
> > that Proctor was able to find one of billions of
> > stars that appears to briefly align with the DP's
> > angle at some point in its history that happens to
> > correspond to the results of a couple of very
> > problematic (in my opinion) RCD studies after
> > presuming many long-term mathematical
> > extrapolations about the Earth's tilt, climate,
> > and random celestial events over the past few
> > millennia. While this may be significant to you,
> > it proves nothing to me about any meaningful
> > connection between stars and the angles of various
> > axes measured in G1 that couldn't be drawn up by
> > any number of other star correlations among those
> > other billion of stars.
>
> I'm sure you understand the pole star is not just
> "one of billions" and is significant to any
> astronomical culture in which the celestial pole
> was paramount to AE religious beliefs.

And I'm sure you understand that if a monument at the 30N latitude was intended to point to the celestial north, the passage would be built at a 30 degree angle and not at 26.5 with the hopes of catching a brief glimpse of a nearby star during its off-axis excursion.



> Given the alignment of the great pyramids to the cardinal
> points and the fact the DP's of all them point in
> the same direction at nearly the same angle it is
> logical to conclude the DP's were made to point
> at something...

Well, that may be one logic, but then when you consider that many pyramid causeways are at the same 4.6 degree incline, what do you suppose is so "logical to conclude" about what they are pointing at?


> ...which given the angle points
> the passage sufficiently close enough to the
> celestial pole it gives credence to the idea this
> was in fact their intended target which is also
> exactly where the AE believed the kings soul was
> supposed to go.

I hear you, and I disagree with that notion. Why point at the closest star rather than the celestial pole itself?



> One could argue these beliefs were
> derived after the fact having nothing to do with
> whoever built them if they wished, but "whoever"
> did build them seemed intent on pointing these
> passages in this direction on purpose which is
> perfectly logical a particular star, the pole
> star, would have been used to make this alignment.

Again, many things are designed to tilt at a certain angle, but that doesn't necessarily mean they're all designed to "point at" something. Aside from all those causeways at 4.6 degrees, modern stairways often show a standard incline between 30 and 37 degrees, so what are they "pointing at"? A standard ramp for a wheelchair is about 5 degrees; what's it pointing at?

What's the GG/AP pointing at? What do the inclined gabled roof blocks point at? what do the walls of the pyramids point at?

Where do you draw the line at whether something is "pointing at" something vs. has an inherent function that simply requires that level of incline?



> > Thanks for thanking me for that effort.
>
> I will always give credit where credit is due and
> my thanks is sincere.

Likewise, please don't take offense at the above. I sincerely do not see the arguments of star alignment as being very compelling but, rather, seem more akin to pareidolia. But as I've said many time before, I'm certainly willing to stand corrected.

So, do you prefer Orion over Cygnus?

______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?



Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 23-Feb-17 21:37 by Origyptian.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 2814 Dr. Troglodyte 30-Jan-17 19:29
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 529 Graham Chase 30-Jan-17 21:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 570 Origyptian 30-Jan-17 23:37
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 453 Thanos5150 31-Jan-17 18:39
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 441 cladking 31-Jan-17 19:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 490 DUNE 31-Jan-17 19:59
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 531 Thanos5150 31-Jan-17 22:18
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 411 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 00:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 440 Thanos5150 01-Feb-17 01:12
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 436 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 02:49
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 436 Thanos5150 01-Feb-17 04:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 574 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 07:08
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 473 Thanos5150 04-Feb-17 18:19
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 389 Warwick 04-Feb-17 18:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 423 Thanos5150 06-Feb-17 23:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 490 Thanos5150 02-Feb-17 21:06
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 361 Warwick 02-Feb-17 22:16
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 414 Thanos5150 03-Feb-17 00:57
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 441 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:10
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 511 Martin Stower 01-Feb-17 03:02
that's easy 508 Warwick 01-Feb-17 20:07
Re: that's easy 542 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 20:49
Re: that's easy 534 M. J. Thomas 01-Feb-17 22:09
Re: that's easy 442 Warwick 01-Feb-17 22:22
Re: that's easy 462 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 23:15
Re: that's easy 473 Warwick 01-Feb-17 23:19
Re: that's easy 464 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 23:33
Re: that's easy 375 Jon Ellison 01-Feb-17 23:50
Re: that's easy 416 Warwick 02-Feb-17 18:39
Re: that's easy 423 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:47
Re: that's easy 456 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:16
Re: that's easy 404 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 20:38
Re: that's easy 451 Warwick 02-Feb-17 22:23
Re: that's easy 392 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:21
Re: that's easy 382 Warwick 02-Feb-17 18:34
Re: that's easy 444 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:40
Re: that's easy 366 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:23
Re: that's easy 422 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 21:11
Re: that's easy 369 Warwick 02-Feb-17 21:22
Re: that's easy 446 Martin Stower 02-Feb-17 22:36
Re: that's easy 436 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:59
Re: that's easy 469 Martin Stower 02-Feb-17 22:24
Re: that's easy 391 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:33
Re: that's easy 460 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 01:55
Re: that's easy 446 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 13:46
Re: that's easy 422 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 16:19
Re: that's easy 410 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 14:42
Re: that's easy 449 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 15:13
Re: that's easy 471 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 15:19
Re: that's easy 391 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 16:00
Re: that's easy 359 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 16:11
Re: that's easy 370 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 16:33
Re: that's easy 423 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 17:06
Re: that's easy 304 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 19:14
Re: that's easy 378 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 20:04
Re: that's easy 221 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 21:28
Re: that's easy 406 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 21:58
Re: that's easy 417 Warwick 03-Feb-17 22:05
Re: that's easy 468 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 22:20
Re: that's easy 365 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 22:30
Re: that's easy 443 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 23:54
Re: that's easy 356 Jon Ellison 04-Feb-17 00:38
Re: that's easy 416 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 00:58
Re: that's easy 407 Jon Ellison 04-Feb-17 01:16
Re: that's easy 514 Jon Ellison 04-Feb-17 02:10
Re: that's easy 452 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 19:47
Re: that's easy 502 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 20:48
Re: that's easy 425 Warwick 04-Feb-17 19:30
Re: that's easy 409 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 22:33
Re: that's easy 412 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 22:45
Re: that's easy 460 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 00:43
Re: that's easy 372 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 00:26
more importantly 363 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:20
Re: more importantly 421 Origyptian 05-Feb-17 23:09
Re: that's easy 456 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 15:49
the flaw is obvious 408 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:31
Re: that's easy 443 M. J. Thomas 02-Feb-17 16:48
Re: that's easy 360 Warwick 02-Feb-17 18:44
Re: that's easy 343 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:51
Re: that's easy 396 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:25
Re: that's easy 489 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 23:11
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 351 M. J. Thomas 02-Feb-17 18:52
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 454 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:57
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 399 M. J. Thomas 02-Feb-17 22:19
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 413 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:19
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 443 M. J. Thomas 03-Feb-17 00:19
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 464 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 00:25
Re: that's easy 585 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 09:54
Re: that's easy 355 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 14:10
Re: that's easy 430 cladking 02-Feb-17 14:46
Re: that's easy 349 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 14:58
Re: that's easy 406 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 15:38
Re: that's easy 354 cladking 02-Feb-17 15:53
Re: that's easy 371 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 16:07
Re: that's easy 467 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 16:40
Re: that's easy 380 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 16:57
Re: that's easy 407 cladking 02-Feb-17 17:21
Re: that's easy 415 DUNE 02-Feb-17 16:53
Re: that's easy 506 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 17:40
Re: that's easy 534 cladking 02-Feb-17 17:54
Re: that's easy 425 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 18:43
Re: that's easy 372 cladking 02-Feb-17 18:51
Re: that's easy 340 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:28
Re: that's easy 411 cladking 02-Feb-17 23:26
IOW's 400 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:55
Re: IOW's 339 cladking 03-Feb-17 23:16
Re: IOW's 518 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:24
Re: IOW's 359 cladking 05-Feb-17 00:53
Re: IOW's 406 Warwick 05-Feb-17 18:29
Re: that's easy 401 DUNE 02-Feb-17 15:05
Re: that's easy 434 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 16:48
Re: that's easy 312 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 17:01
Re: that's easy 426 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 17:51
Re: that's easy 386 cladking 02-Feb-17 18:09
Re: that's easy 381 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 18:48
Re: that's easy 466 cladking 02-Feb-17 19:01
Re: that's easy 425 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:56
Re: that's easy 343 cladking 02-Feb-17 23:29
Re: that's easy 294 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:01
Re: that's easy 369 cladking 03-Feb-17 23:24
Re: that's easy 356 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:22
Re: that's easy 446 cladking 05-Feb-17 00:56
Re: that's easy 373 Warwick 05-Feb-17 17:48
Re: that's easy 417 cladking 05-Feb-17 18:16
Re: that's easy 355 Warwick 05-Feb-17 18:27
Re: that's easy 376 cladking 06-Feb-17 01:28
Re: that's easy 358 Warwick 06-Feb-17 18:00
Re: that's easy 400 cladking 06-Feb-17 18:30
Re: that's easy 334 Warwick 06-Feb-17 18:45
Re: that's easy 401 cladking 06-Feb-17 19:10
Re: that's easy 436 Warwick 06-Feb-17 19:46
Re: that's easy 329 Origyptian 06-Feb-17 19:58
Re: that's easy 358 Warwick 06-Feb-17 20:17
Re: that's easy 389 Origyptian 06-Feb-17 21:50
Re: that's easy 353 Martin Stower 07-Feb-17 01:10
Re: that's easy 470 Warwick 07-Feb-17 17:02
Re: that's easy 441 cladking 07-Feb-17 19:59
Re: that's easy 330 Martin Stower 08-Feb-17 15:40
Re: that's easy 380 Warwick 08-Feb-17 16:49
Re: that's easy 434 Origyptian 07-Feb-17 20:32
Re: that's easy 460 Martin Stower 07-Feb-17 23:12
Re: that's easy 335 Origyptian 08-Feb-17 21:47
Re: that's easy 395 Martin Stower 09-Feb-17 00:05
Re: that's easy 382 Origyptian 09-Feb-17 05:52
Re: that's easy 440 Martin Stower 09-Feb-17 20:09
a Question.. 429 Warwick 10-Feb-17 18:52
Re: a Question.. 497 Audrey 11-Feb-17 01:01
Re: a Question.. 318 Warwick 11-Feb-17 06:13
Re: a Question.. 380 Origyptian 11-Feb-17 16:52
Re: a Question.. 359 Warwick 11-Feb-17 21:39
Re: a Question.. 418 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 22:10
Re: a Question.. 439 Warwick 11-Feb-17 22:48
Re: a Question.. 325 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 22:48
Re: a Question.. 337 Origyptian 12-Feb-17 18:29
Re: a Question.. 392 Martin Stower 12-Feb-17 20:46
Re: a Question.. 348 Audrey 12-Feb-17 22:23
FYI 354 Warwick 13-Feb-17 16:59
Re: FYI 361 cladking 13-Feb-17 17:18
Re: a Question.. 413 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 21:09
Re: a Question.. 357 Audrey 12-Feb-17 22:32
Re: a Question.. 359 Martin Stower 12-Feb-17 23:36
Re: a Question.. 412 Audrey 12-Feb-17 23:44
Re: a Question.. 412 Martin Stower 13-Feb-17 00:11
Re: a Question.. 345 Audrey 13-Feb-17 00:46
Re: a Question.. 445 Martin Stower 13-Feb-17 02:12
Re: a Question.. 420 Audrey 13-Feb-17 04:23
Shifting opinions 366 Merrell 13-Feb-17 09:55
Re: a Question.. 412 Martin Stower 13-Feb-17 12:43
This is getting silly 442 Warwick 13-Feb-17 17:23
Re: This is getting silly 527 Martin Stower 14-Feb-17 00:39
Re: This is getting silly 306 Warwick 14-Feb-17 20:28
Re: This is getting silly 403 Origyptian 14-Feb-17 20:33
Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 369 cladking 14-Feb-17 21:35
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 374 Martin Stower 14-Feb-17 22:57
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 351 cladking 14-Feb-17 23:06
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 316 M. J. Thomas 14-Feb-17 23:54
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 365 Martin Stower 15-Feb-17 00:10
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 457 cladking 15-Feb-17 03:53
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 522 DUNE 15-Feb-17 12:22
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 329 cladking 15-Feb-17 14:41
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 317 Martin Stower 15-Feb-17 13:59
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 368 Warwick 15-Feb-17 16:44
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 335 cladking 15-Feb-17 18:26
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 448 Martin Stower 16-Feb-17 00:54
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 365 cladking 16-Feb-17 01:27
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 348 Martin Stower 16-Feb-17 03:20
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 454 cladking 16-Feb-17 04:29
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 392 Martin Stower 17-Feb-17 15:20
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 376 cladking 17-Feb-17 16:17
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 480 Martin Stower 21-Feb-17 23:56
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 310 cladking 22-Feb-17 03:24
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 368 Martin Stower 22-Feb-17 14:31
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 330 cladking 22-Feb-17 14:56
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 349 Martin Stower 22-Feb-17 15:39
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 411 cladking 22-Feb-17 19:30
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 440 Martin Stower 22-Feb-17 21:40
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 457 cladking 23-Feb-17 00:54
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 343 Martin Stower 23-Feb-17 03:52
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 388 cladking 23-Feb-17 04:22
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 231 Martin Stower 23-Feb-17 22:19
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 370 Audrey 23-Feb-17 03:27
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 283 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:41
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 393 cladking 23-Feb-17 04:48
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 279 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 16:25
Let's all have a go 210 Warwick 22-Feb-17 17:50
Re: Let's all have a go 420 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 19:10
Re: Let's all have a go 323 cladking 22-Feb-17 20:22
Re: Let's all have a go 356 Corpuscles 22-Feb-17 22:29
Re: Let's all have a go 332 cladking 23-Feb-17 00:43
Re: Let's all have a go 282 cladking 23-Feb-17 00:59
Re: Let's all have a go 396 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 03:26
Re: Let's all have a go 332 Warwick 23-Feb-17 19:18
Re: Let's all have a go 331 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:45
Re: Let's all have a go 327 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:36
Re: Let's all have a go 271 Warwick 23-Feb-17 19:05
Re: Let's all have a go 257 Warwick 23-Feb-17 16:41
Re: Let's all have a go 223 Warwick 23-Feb-17 16:57
Re: Let's all have a go 383 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 17:03
Re: Let's all have a go 226 Warwick 23-Feb-17 17:11
Re: Let's all have a go 384 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 18:30
Re: Let's all have a go 302 Warwick 23-Feb-17 18:57
Re: Let's all have a go 214 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:00
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 286 cladking 22-Feb-17 18:58
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 357 Warwick 16-Feb-17 20:31
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 395 cladking 16-Feb-17 21:15
Re: that's easy 423 Martin Stower 07-Feb-17 00:49
Re: that's easy 388 cladking 06-Feb-17 21:34
Re: that's easy 354 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:33
Re: that's easy 418 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 19:03
Re: that's easy 382 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 20:00
Re: that's easy 359 Warwick 02-Feb-17 20:07
Re: that's easy 364 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:24
Re: that's easy 379 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:35
correction 262 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:46
Re: correction 445 Origyptian 04-Feb-17 03:46
Re: correction 384 cladking 04-Feb-17 16:01
Re: correction 346 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:40
Re: correction 350 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:37
Re: correction 386 Origyptian 05-Feb-17 23:14
Re: correction 477 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 23:08
Re: correction 380 Origyptian 12-Feb-17 18:42
Re: correction 336 Martin Stower 12-Feb-17 20:42
Re: that's easy 433 Warwick 01-Feb-17 22:13
Re: that's easy 479 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 22:46
Re: that's easy 376 Martin Stower 01-Feb-17 22:38
Re: that's easy 444 Sirfiroth 02-Feb-17 00:38
Re: that's easy 410 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Feb-17 01:02
Re: that's easy 492 Sirfiroth 02-Feb-17 02:29
Re: that's easy 353 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Feb-17 15:25
Re: that's easy 405 Sirfiroth 02-Feb-17 19:35
Re: that's easy 357 DUNE 02-Feb-17 20:34
Re: that's easy 312 Warwick 02-Feb-17 20:41
Re: that's easy 361 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:41
Re: that's easy 355 DUNE 02-Feb-17 22:55
Re: that's easy 431 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:49
Re: that's easy 536 DUNE 03-Feb-17 08:36
Petrie, Maragioglio and Rinaldi, and Davidson Object 448 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Feb-17 22:08
Re: Petrie, Maragioglio and Rinaldi, and Davidson Object 373 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:11
Re: Petrie, Maragioglio and Rinaldi, and Davidson Object 351 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 410 Spiros 01-Feb-17 00:40
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 404 Thanos5150 01-Feb-17 01:23
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 380 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 02:52
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 446 DUNE 01-Feb-17 21:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 331 molder 02-Feb-17 12:14
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 373 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 14:29
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 397 eyeofhorus33 02-Feb-17 19:04
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 390 Steve Clayton 02-Feb-17 20:20
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 352 eyeofhorus33 02-Feb-17 21:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 309 Warwick 02-Feb-17 22:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 362 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:07
twisting and turning 320 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:52
Re: twisting and turning 470 Origyptian 04-Feb-17 02:58
Re: twisting and turning 401 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:49
Re: twisting and turning 362 Origyptian 05-Feb-17 23:22
Re: twisting and turning 367 Martin Stower 06-Feb-17 01:54
Re: twisting and turning 367 Warwick 06-Feb-17 17:13
Re: twisting and turning 408 cladking 06-Feb-17 17:31
Re: twisting and turning 353 Warwick 06-Feb-17 17:54
From here it looks like the backstroke. 327 cladking 06-Feb-17 18:22
Re: From here it looks like the backstroke. 349 Warwick 06-Feb-17 18:28
Re: twisting and turning 351 Origyptian 06-Feb-17 19:14
More twisting nd turning 368 Warwick 06-Feb-17 19:30
Re: twisting and turning 349 Thunderbird 06-Feb-17 19:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 338 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:03
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 382 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:36
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 348 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 21:48
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 347 Warwick 03-Feb-17 21:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 371 Steve Clayton 02-Feb-17 19:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 472 drew 07-Feb-17 00:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 454 Manu 17-Feb-17 18:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 313 Dr. Troglodyte 18-Feb-17 21:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 355 Manu 18-Feb-17 21:33
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 237 Origyptian 19-Feb-17 17:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 247 Manu 19-Feb-17 18:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 327 Origyptian 19-Feb-17 19:04
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 226 Manu 19-Feb-17 20:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 322 Thanos5150 19-Feb-17 21:26
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 283 Manu 19-Feb-17 22:10
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 320 Thanos5150 19-Feb-17 23:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 318 Manu 20-Feb-17 04:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 337 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 15:23
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 325 Manu 20-Feb-17 16:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 312 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 16:51
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 253 Manu 21-Feb-17 13:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 383 Origyptian 21-Feb-17 15:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 245 Manu 21-Feb-17 16:27
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 330 Origyptian 21-Feb-17 18:03
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 345 Audrey 22-Feb-17 01:16
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 317 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:51
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 380 SandyJesse 24-Feb-17 02:33
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 381 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 20:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 290 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 21:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 330 Warwick 20-Feb-17 22:11
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 273 cladking 20-Feb-17 22:43
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 229 Warwick 21-Feb-17 17:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 301 cladking 21-Feb-17 20:06
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 300 Warwick 21-Feb-17 20:25
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 304 Manu 21-Feb-17 13:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 202 Manu 21-Feb-17 13:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 239 Thanos5150 21-Feb-17 23:39
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 382 Audrey 20-Feb-17 20:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 263 Jon Ellison 20-Feb-17 21:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 224 Manu 21-Feb-17 14:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 330 Audrey 22-Feb-17 00:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 159 Jon Ellison 22-Feb-17 00:42
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 227 Jon Ellison 22-Feb-17 00:59
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 300 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 01:46
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 233 Audrey 22-Feb-17 03:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 297 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 314 Audrey 23-Feb-17 01:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 251 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 02:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 383 Audrey 23-Feb-17 04:11
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 280 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 17:28
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 264 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 401 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 17:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 235 Warwick 23-Feb-17 18:08
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 321 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 18:42
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 273 Jon Ellison 22-Feb-17 09:18
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 345 Audrey 22-Feb-17 18:02
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 324 Audrey 22-Feb-17 02:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 301 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 15:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 350 Audrey 23-Feb-17 01:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 303 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 02:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 286 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 283 Audrey 23-Feb-17 04:17
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 386 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 333 Jon Ellison 23-Feb-17 11:33
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 350 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 14:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 330 Jon Ellison 23-Feb-17 16:48
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 250 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 16:52
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 216 Jon Ellison 23-Feb-17 17:03
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 287 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 17:13
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 277 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 18:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 337 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 18:34
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 305 Warwick 23-Feb-17 18:43
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 347 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 19:52
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 312 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 20:14
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 316 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 20:57
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 285 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 21:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 224 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 21:56
a really awesome post 339 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 241 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 252 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 290 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 19:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 230 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 348 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 17:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 336 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 18:19
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 298 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 397 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 322 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 21:47
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 315 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 17:20
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 381 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 20:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 367 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 21:04
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 289 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 21:25
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 297 Thanos5150 25-Feb-17 01:25
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 377 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 21:13
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 452 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 21:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 396 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 22:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 318 Thanos5150 25-Feb-17 01:40
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 417 Audrey 25-Feb-17 19:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 549 Origyptian 25-Feb-17 21:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 485 Audrey 25-Feb-17 16:49
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 546 Thanos5150 25-Feb-17 18:09
I see all the stars. ;) 290 cladking 25-Feb-17 18:17
quote of the month 370 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 329 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 03:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 254 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 04:26
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 361 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 05:08
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 337 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 14:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 318 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 22:28
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 268 Warwick 20-Feb-17 22:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 332 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 22:57
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 509 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 23:40
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 380 Warwick 21-Feb-17 18:47
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 364 cladking 21-Feb-17 19:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 344 Warwick 21-Feb-17 20:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 364 cladking 21-Feb-17 21:36
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 304 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 233 Warwick 22-Feb-17 17:37
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 291 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 18:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 289 Warwick 22-Feb-17 18:39
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 265 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 19:15
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 439 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 21:19
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 507 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 22:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 323 Warwick 24-Feb-17 18:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 322 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 19:37
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 221 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 20:28
Angle, Orientation, time of year 347 Warwick 20-Feb-17 18:37
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 321 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 23:14
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 229 Warwick 21-Feb-17 18:15
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 375 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:07
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 393 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 05:00
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 370 Spiros 25-Feb-17 01:17


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.