Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanos5150 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > You might recall my perspective of
> > those RCD C14 studies: They describe very
> > problematic methodology and are replete with the
> > risk of sample contamination due to modern carbon,
> > apparently as a deliberate design component of the
> > methodology.
>
> I also recall my disagreement with this which you
> conceded namely that of the 700+ samples between
> not just two, but 3 studies, all fall within the
> greater Dynastic period.

Well, not exactly. The '95 study systematically showed more recent dating than the earlier study and the authors conspicuously avoided addressing that clear enigma in the dating. LIkewise, all three Gizamids were dated concurrently which is not at all in line with traditional thought, or even in the realm of logic.

By the way, what's the definition of "greater Dynastic period"?



> These studies comprise
> the largest statistical RCD data sample ever taken
> of the ancient world...

Practice makes permanent, it doesn't make perfect.



> ...so despite whatever
> misgiving you may have which quite frankly I do
> not see as objective, unless we are to conclude
> RCD itself is completely bogus (which I don't)...

That strikes me as a false equivalence. There are other possibilities than your simple "unless" clause allows. I've stated on the record that I have no problem with RCD science. It's the misuse of it that I object to.



> ... at large the majority of the samples cannot all be
> "wrong" and not a one pointed to any date outside
> the Naqada period...

Yes, isn't it interesting that a couple were dated millennia earlier. Why do you think that is? Could it be that we, in fact, do NOT know what the "majority of all the samples" showed since a huge fraction of them were not reported, they weren't included in the analysis, no criteria was offered for their omission, and no reason was given for them being put into a "reserve". We only know about the data they chose to report.



> ... Feel free to interpret this how
> you like but unless one rejects RCD as a whole the
> data speaks for itself and should be deemed as a
> credible guide regardless of how one wants to
> interpret its meaning.

That's a contradiction. The data does indeed speak for itself, and from my read, it loses a great deal of credibility because of the methodology chosen by the authors regarding the handling and analysis of that data.



> > I can't speak for anyone else, but what I "want"
> > is simply the truth and not a contrived narrative
> > based on what appears to be arbitrary correlation.
> > In absence of any certainty, at least something
> > that makes the most sense that fits the evidence
> > while avoiding logical contradictions. I don't see
> > star alignments as meeting that basic criteria.
>
>
> > The "effort" I put into this merely revealed to me
> > that Proctor was able to find one of billions of
> > stars that appears to briefly align with the DP's
> > angle at some point in its history that happens to
> > correspond to the results of a couple of very
> > problematic (in my opinion) RCD studies after
> > presuming many long-term mathematical
> > extrapolations about the Earth's tilt, climate,
> > and random celestial events over the past few
> > millennia. While this may be significant to you,
> > it proves nothing to me about any meaningful
> > connection between stars and the angles of various
> > axes measured in G1 that couldn't be drawn up by
> > any number of other star correlations among those
> > other billion of stars.
>
> I'm sure you understand the pole star is not just
> "one of billions" and is significant to any
> astronomical culture in which the celestial pole
> was paramount to AE religious beliefs.

And I'm sure you understand that if a monument at the 30N latitude was intended to point to the celestial north, the passage would be built at a 30 degree angle and not at 26.5 with the hopes of catching a brief glimpse of a nearby star during its off-axis excursion.



> Given the alignment of the great pyramids to the cardinal
> points and the fact the DP's of all them point in
> the same direction at nearly the same angle it is
> logical to conclude the DP's were made to point
> at something...

Well, that may be one logic, but then when you consider that many pyramid causeways are at the same 4.6 degree incline, what do you suppose is so "logical to conclude" about what they are pointing at?


> ...which given the angle points
> the passage sufficiently close enough to the
> celestial pole it gives credence to the idea this
> was in fact their intended target which is also
> exactly where the AE believed the kings soul was
> supposed to go.

I hear you, and I disagree with that notion. Why point at the closest star rather than the celestial pole itself?



> One could argue these beliefs were
> derived after the fact having nothing to do with
> whoever built them if they wished, but "whoever"
> did build them seemed intent on pointing these
> passages in this direction on purpose which is
> perfectly logical a particular star, the pole
> star, would have been used to make this alignment.

Again, many things are designed to tilt at a certain angle, but that doesn't necessarily mean they're all designed to "point at" something. Aside from all those causeways at 4.6 degrees, modern stairways often show a standard incline between 30 and 37 degrees, so what are they "pointing at"? A standard ramp for a wheelchair is about 5 degrees; what's it pointing at?

What's the GG/AP pointing at? What do the inclined gabled roof blocks point at? what do the walls of the pyramids point at?

Where do you draw the line at whether something is "pointing at" something vs. has an inherent function that simply requires that level of incline?



> > Thanks for thanking me for that effort.
>
> I will always give credit where credit is due and
> my thanks is sincere.

Likewise, please don't take offense at the above. I sincerely do not see the arguments of star alignment as being very compelling but, rather, seem more akin to pareidolia. But as I've said many time before, I'm certainly willing to stand corrected.

So, do you prefer Orion over Cygnus?

______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?



Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 23-Feb-17 21:37 by Origyptian.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 2875 Dr. Troglodyte 30-Jan-17 19:29
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 582 Graham Chase 30-Jan-17 21:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 616 Origyptian 30-Jan-17 23:37
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 502 Thanos5150 31-Jan-17 18:39
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 489 cladking 31-Jan-17 19:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 533 DUNE 31-Jan-17 19:59
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 577 Thanos5150 31-Jan-17 22:18
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 462 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 00:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 484 Thanos5150 01-Feb-17 01:12
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 484 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 02:49
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 474 Thanos5150 01-Feb-17 04:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 622 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 07:08
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 508 Thanos5150 04-Feb-17 18:19
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 440 Warwick 04-Feb-17 18:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 466 Thanos5150 06-Feb-17 23:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 544 Thanos5150 02-Feb-17 21:06
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 418 Warwick 02-Feb-17 22:16
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 457 Thanos5150 03-Feb-17 00:57
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 487 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:10
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 558 Martin Stower 01-Feb-17 03:02
that's easy 551 Warwick 01-Feb-17 20:07
Re: that's easy 588 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 20:49
Re: that's easy 580 M. J. Thomas 01-Feb-17 22:09
Re: that's easy 490 Warwick 01-Feb-17 22:22
Re: that's easy 511 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 23:15
Re: that's easy 521 Warwick 01-Feb-17 23:19
Re: that's easy 520 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 23:33
Re: that's easy 416 Jon Ellison 01-Feb-17 23:50
Re: that's easy 457 Warwick 02-Feb-17 18:39
Re: that's easy 466 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:47
Re: that's easy 502 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:16
Re: that's easy 444 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 20:38
Re: that's easy 503 Warwick 02-Feb-17 22:23
Re: that's easy 437 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:21
Re: that's easy 432 Warwick 02-Feb-17 18:34
Re: that's easy 484 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:40
Re: that's easy 408 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:23
Re: that's easy 463 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 21:11
Re: that's easy 419 Warwick 02-Feb-17 21:22
Re: that's easy 491 Martin Stower 02-Feb-17 22:36
Re: that's easy 475 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:59
Re: that's easy 521 Martin Stower 02-Feb-17 22:24
Re: that's easy 439 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:33
Re: that's easy 503 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 01:55
Re: that's easy 494 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 13:46
Re: that's easy 483 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 16:19
Re: that's easy 451 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 14:42
Re: that's easy 491 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 15:13
Re: that's easy 518 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 15:19
Re: that's easy 440 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 16:00
Re: that's easy 408 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 16:11
Re: that's easy 420 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 16:33
Re: that's easy 481 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 17:06
Re: that's easy 350 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 19:14
Re: that's easy 422 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 20:04
Re: that's easy 267 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 21:28
Re: that's easy 446 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 21:58
Re: that's easy 464 Warwick 03-Feb-17 22:05
Re: that's easy 516 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 22:20
Re: that's easy 414 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 22:30
Re: that's easy 488 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 23:54
Re: that's easy 401 Jon Ellison 04-Feb-17 00:38
Re: that's easy 458 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 00:58
Re: that's easy 457 Jon Ellison 04-Feb-17 01:16
Re: that's easy 556 Jon Ellison 04-Feb-17 02:10
Re: that's easy 486 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 19:47
Re: that's easy 553 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 20:48
Re: that's easy 462 Warwick 04-Feb-17 19:30
Re: that's easy 450 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 22:33
Re: that's easy 460 Jon Ellison 03-Feb-17 22:45
Re: that's easy 505 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 00:43
Re: that's easy 420 Martin Stower 04-Feb-17 00:26
more importantly 410 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:20
Re: more importantly 466 Origyptian 05-Feb-17 23:09
Re: that's easy 500 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 15:49
the flaw is obvious 458 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:31
Re: that's easy 486 M. J. Thomas 02-Feb-17 16:48
Re: that's easy 400 Warwick 02-Feb-17 18:44
Re: that's easy 394 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:51
Re: that's easy 441 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:25
Re: that's easy 538 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 23:11
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 394 M. J. Thomas 02-Feb-17 18:52
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 505 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:57
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 445 M. J. Thomas 02-Feb-17 22:19
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 459 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:19
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 488 M. J. Thomas 03-Feb-17 00:19
Re: GP Sarcophagus and East-West alignment issue 510 Origyptian 03-Feb-17 00:25
Re: that's easy 644 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 09:54
Re: that's easy 401 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 14:10
Re: that's easy 477 cladking 02-Feb-17 14:46
Re: that's easy 396 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 14:58
Re: that's easy 450 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 15:38
Re: that's easy 399 cladking 02-Feb-17 15:53
Re: that's easy 415 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 16:07
Re: that's easy 519 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 16:40
Re: that's easy 423 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 16:57
Re: that's easy 455 cladking 02-Feb-17 17:21
Re: that's easy 463 DUNE 02-Feb-17 16:53
Re: that's easy 564 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 17:40
Re: that's easy 580 cladking 02-Feb-17 17:54
Re: that's easy 477 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 18:43
Re: that's easy 418 cladking 02-Feb-17 18:51
Re: that's easy 381 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:28
Re: that's easy 456 cladking 02-Feb-17 23:26
IOW's 448 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:55
Re: IOW's 387 cladking 03-Feb-17 23:16
Re: IOW's 557 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:24
Re: IOW's 408 cladking 05-Feb-17 00:53
Re: IOW's 449 Warwick 05-Feb-17 18:29
Re: that's easy 442 DUNE 02-Feb-17 15:05
Re: that's easy 490 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 16:48
Re: that's easy 357 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 17:01
Re: that's easy 479 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 17:51
Re: that's easy 425 cladking 02-Feb-17 18:09
Re: that's easy 433 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 18:48
Re: that's easy 511 cladking 02-Feb-17 19:01
Re: that's easy 471 Warwick 02-Feb-17 19:56
Re: that's easy 387 cladking 02-Feb-17 23:29
Re: that's easy 333 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:01
Re: that's easy 417 cladking 03-Feb-17 23:24
Re: that's easy 406 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:22
Re: that's easy 485 cladking 05-Feb-17 00:56
Re: that's easy 417 Warwick 05-Feb-17 17:48
Re: that's easy 459 cladking 05-Feb-17 18:16
Re: that's easy 397 Warwick 05-Feb-17 18:27
Re: that's easy 421 cladking 06-Feb-17 01:28
Re: that's easy 400 Warwick 06-Feb-17 18:00
Re: that's easy 434 cladking 06-Feb-17 18:30
Re: that's easy 381 Warwick 06-Feb-17 18:45
Re: that's easy 446 cladking 06-Feb-17 19:10
Re: that's easy 478 Warwick 06-Feb-17 19:46
Re: that's easy 387 Origyptian 06-Feb-17 19:58
Re: that's easy 410 Warwick 06-Feb-17 20:17
Re: that's easy 435 Origyptian 06-Feb-17 21:50
Re: that's easy 402 Martin Stower 07-Feb-17 01:10
Re: that's easy 506 Warwick 07-Feb-17 17:02
Re: that's easy 481 cladking 07-Feb-17 19:59
Re: that's easy 371 Martin Stower 08-Feb-17 15:40
Re: that's easy 432 Warwick 08-Feb-17 16:49
Re: that's easy 475 Origyptian 07-Feb-17 20:32
Re: that's easy 505 Martin Stower 07-Feb-17 23:12
Re: that's easy 381 Origyptian 08-Feb-17 21:47
Re: that's easy 439 Martin Stower 09-Feb-17 00:05
Re: that's easy 432 Origyptian 09-Feb-17 05:52
Re: that's easy 487 Martin Stower 09-Feb-17 20:09
a Question.. 470 Warwick 10-Feb-17 18:52
Re: a Question.. 548 Audrey 11-Feb-17 01:01
Re: a Question.. 359 Warwick 11-Feb-17 06:13
Re: a Question.. 428 Origyptian 11-Feb-17 16:52
Re: a Question.. 401 Warwick 11-Feb-17 21:39
Re: a Question.. 490 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 22:10
Re: a Question.. 480 Warwick 11-Feb-17 22:48
Re: a Question.. 369 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 22:48
Re: a Question.. 380 Origyptian 12-Feb-17 18:29
Re: a Question.. 435 Martin Stower 12-Feb-17 20:46
Re: a Question.. 391 Audrey 12-Feb-17 22:23
FYI 402 Warwick 13-Feb-17 16:59
Re: FYI 406 cladking 13-Feb-17 17:18
Re: a Question.. 450 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 21:09
Re: a Question.. 401 Audrey 12-Feb-17 22:32
Re: a Question.. 404 Martin Stower 12-Feb-17 23:36
Re: a Question.. 465 Audrey 12-Feb-17 23:44
Re: a Question.. 463 Martin Stower 13-Feb-17 00:11
Re: a Question.. 392 Audrey 13-Feb-17 00:46
Re: a Question.. 491 Martin Stower 13-Feb-17 02:12
Re: a Question.. 463 Audrey 13-Feb-17 04:23
Shifting opinions 405 Merrell 13-Feb-17 09:55
Re: a Question.. 458 Martin Stower 13-Feb-17 12:43
This is getting silly 489 Warwick 13-Feb-17 17:23
Re: This is getting silly 572 Martin Stower 14-Feb-17 00:39
Re: This is getting silly 350 Warwick 14-Feb-17 20:28
Re: This is getting silly 446 Origyptian 14-Feb-17 20:33
Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 418 cladking 14-Feb-17 21:35
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 415 Martin Stower 14-Feb-17 22:57
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 396 cladking 14-Feb-17 23:06
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 360 M. J. Thomas 14-Feb-17 23:54
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 405 Martin Stower 15-Feb-17 00:10
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 505 cladking 15-Feb-17 03:53
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 565 DUNE 15-Feb-17 12:22
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 375 cladking 15-Feb-17 14:41
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 360 Martin Stower 15-Feb-17 13:59
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 414 Warwick 15-Feb-17 16:44
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 380 cladking 15-Feb-17 18:26
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 491 Martin Stower 16-Feb-17 00:54
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 412 cladking 16-Feb-17 01:27
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 386 Martin Stower 16-Feb-17 03:20
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 513 cladking 16-Feb-17 04:29
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 434 Martin Stower 17-Feb-17 15:20
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 419 cladking 17-Feb-17 16:17
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 568 Martin Stower 21-Feb-17 23:56
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 351 cladking 22-Feb-17 03:24
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 412 Martin Stower 22-Feb-17 14:31
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 371 cladking 22-Feb-17 14:56
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 397 Martin Stower 22-Feb-17 15:39
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 451 cladking 22-Feb-17 19:30
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 488 Martin Stower 22-Feb-17 21:40
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 501 cladking 23-Feb-17 00:54
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 384 Martin Stower 23-Feb-17 03:52
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 428 cladking 23-Feb-17 04:22
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 266 Martin Stower 23-Feb-17 22:19
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 420 Audrey 23-Feb-17 03:27
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 328 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:41
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 437 cladking 23-Feb-17 04:48
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 318 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 16:25
Let's all have a go 250 Warwick 22-Feb-17 17:50
Re: Let's all have a go 468 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 19:10
Re: Let's all have a go 367 cladking 22-Feb-17 20:22
Re: Let's all have a go 404 Corpuscles 22-Feb-17 22:29
Re: Let's all have a go 374 cladking 23-Feb-17 00:43
Re: Let's all have a go 321 cladking 23-Feb-17 00:59
Re: Let's all have a go 442 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 03:26
Re: Let's all have a go 373 Warwick 23-Feb-17 19:18
Re: Let's all have a go 372 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:45
Re: Let's all have a go 379 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:36
Re: Let's all have a go 316 Warwick 23-Feb-17 19:05
Re: Let's all have a go 300 Warwick 23-Feb-17 16:41
Re: Let's all have a go 266 Warwick 23-Feb-17 16:57
Re: Let's all have a go 419 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 17:03
Re: Let's all have a go 261 Warwick 23-Feb-17 17:11
Re: Let's all have a go 427 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 18:30
Re: Let's all have a go 339 Warwick 23-Feb-17 18:57
Re: Let's all have a go 253 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:00
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 333 cladking 22-Feb-17 18:58
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 401 Warwick 16-Feb-17 20:31
Re: Ditch... ...horse... ...cart. 445 cladking 16-Feb-17 21:15
Re: that's easy 474 Martin Stower 07-Feb-17 00:49
Re: that's easy 423 cladking 06-Feb-17 21:34
Re: that's easy 397 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 18:33
Re: that's easy 477 Graham Chase 02-Feb-17 19:03
Re: that's easy 423 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 20:00
Re: that's easy 402 Warwick 02-Feb-17 20:07
Re: that's easy 410 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:24
Re: that's easy 412 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:35
correction 303 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:46
Re: correction 493 Origyptian 04-Feb-17 03:46
Re: correction 430 cladking 04-Feb-17 16:01
Re: correction 390 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:40
Re: correction 390 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:37
Re: correction 418 Origyptian 05-Feb-17 23:14
Re: correction 525 Martin Stower 11-Feb-17 23:08
Re: correction 425 Origyptian 12-Feb-17 18:42
Re: correction 377 Martin Stower 12-Feb-17 20:42
Re: that's easy 477 Warwick 01-Feb-17 22:13
Re: that's easy 538 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 22:46
Re: that's easy 422 Martin Stower 01-Feb-17 22:38
Re: that's easy 484 Sirfiroth 02-Feb-17 00:38
Re: that's easy 458 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Feb-17 01:02
Re: that's easy 539 Sirfiroth 02-Feb-17 02:29
Re: that's easy 392 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Feb-17 15:25
Re: that's easy 446 Sirfiroth 02-Feb-17 19:35
Re: that's easy 397 DUNE 02-Feb-17 20:34
Re: that's easy 358 Warwick 02-Feb-17 20:41
Re: that's easy 411 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 22:41
Re: that's easy 398 DUNE 02-Feb-17 22:55
Re: that's easy 483 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:49
Re: that's easy 623 DUNE 03-Feb-17 08:36
Petrie, Maragioglio and Rinaldi, and Davidson Object 494 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Feb-17 22:08
Re: Petrie, Maragioglio and Rinaldi, and Davidson Object 419 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:11
Re: Petrie, Maragioglio and Rinaldi, and Davidson Object 401 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 451 Spiros 01-Feb-17 00:40
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 451 Thanos5150 01-Feb-17 01:23
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 431 Origyptian 01-Feb-17 02:52
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 496 DUNE 01-Feb-17 21:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 371 molder 02-Feb-17 12:14
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 425 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 14:29
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 445 eyeofhorus33 02-Feb-17 19:04
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 441 Steve Clayton 02-Feb-17 20:20
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 401 eyeofhorus33 02-Feb-17 21:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 348 Warwick 02-Feb-17 22:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 403 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:07
twisting and turning 367 Warwick 03-Feb-17 17:52
Re: twisting and turning 511 Origyptian 04-Feb-17 02:58
Re: twisting and turning 437 Warwick 04-Feb-17 20:49
Re: twisting and turning 405 Origyptian 05-Feb-17 23:22
Re: twisting and turning 412 Martin Stower 06-Feb-17 01:54
Re: twisting and turning 399 Warwick 06-Feb-17 17:13
Re: twisting and turning 450 cladking 06-Feb-17 17:31
Re: twisting and turning 398 Warwick 06-Feb-17 17:54
From here it looks like the backstroke. 370 cladking 06-Feb-17 18:22
Re: From here it looks like the backstroke. 405 Warwick 06-Feb-17 18:28
Re: twisting and turning 407 Origyptian 06-Feb-17 19:14
More twisting nd turning 411 Warwick 06-Feb-17 19:30
Re: twisting and turning 392 Thunderbird 06-Feb-17 19:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 377 Origyptian 02-Feb-17 23:03
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 424 Warwick 03-Feb-17 18:36
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 389 Martin Stower 03-Feb-17 21:48
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 387 Warwick 03-Feb-17 21:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 413 Steve Clayton 02-Feb-17 19:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 513 drew 07-Feb-17 00:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 490 Manu 17-Feb-17 18:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 352 Dr. Troglodyte 18-Feb-17 21:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 402 Manu 18-Feb-17 21:33
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 291 Origyptian 19-Feb-17 17:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 301 Manu 19-Feb-17 18:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 371 Origyptian 19-Feb-17 19:04
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 269 Manu 19-Feb-17 20:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 367 Thanos5150 19-Feb-17 21:26
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 327 Manu 19-Feb-17 22:10
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 372 Thanos5150 19-Feb-17 23:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 364 Manu 20-Feb-17 04:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 380 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 15:23
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 368 Manu 20-Feb-17 16:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 360 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 16:51
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 293 Manu 21-Feb-17 13:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 426 Origyptian 21-Feb-17 15:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 287 Manu 21-Feb-17 16:27
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 371 Origyptian 21-Feb-17 18:03
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 390 Audrey 22-Feb-17 01:16
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 359 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:51
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 435 SandyJesse 24-Feb-17 02:33
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 418 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 20:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 337 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 21:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 376 Warwick 20-Feb-17 22:11
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 316 cladking 20-Feb-17 22:43
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 273 Warwick 21-Feb-17 17:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 350 cladking 21-Feb-17 20:06
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 342 Warwick 21-Feb-17 20:25
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 349 Manu 21-Feb-17 13:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 250 Manu 21-Feb-17 13:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 286 Thanos5150 21-Feb-17 23:39
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 431 Audrey 20-Feb-17 20:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 305 Jon Ellison 20-Feb-17 21:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 274 Manu 21-Feb-17 14:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 362 Audrey 22-Feb-17 00:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 196 Jon Ellison 22-Feb-17 00:42
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 271 Jon Ellison 22-Feb-17 00:59
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 343 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 01:46
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 288 Audrey 22-Feb-17 03:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 339 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 353 Audrey 23-Feb-17 01:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 297 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 02:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 423 Audrey 23-Feb-17 04:11
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 322 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 17:28
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 311 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 440 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 17:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 275 Warwick 23-Feb-17 18:08
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 376 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 18:42
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 311 Jon Ellison 22-Feb-17 09:18
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 388 Audrey 22-Feb-17 18:02
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 364 Audrey 22-Feb-17 02:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 345 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 15:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 399 Audrey 23-Feb-17 01:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 346 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 02:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 327 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 327 Audrey 23-Feb-17 04:17
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 432 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 04:55
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 372 Jon Ellison 23-Feb-17 11:33
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 393 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 14:22
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 373 Jon Ellison 23-Feb-17 16:48
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 291 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 16:52
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 255 Jon Ellison 23-Feb-17 17:03
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 330 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 17:13
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 321 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 18:24
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 394 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 18:34
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 350 Warwick 23-Feb-17 18:43
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 391 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 19:52
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 352 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 20:14
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 357 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 20:57
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 328 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 21:05
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 266 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 21:56
a really awesome post 383 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:21
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 282 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 294 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 348 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 19:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 280 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:50
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 391 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 17:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 379 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 18:19
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 352 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 19:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 443 Origyptian 23-Feb-17 20:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 364 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 21:47
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 367 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 17:20
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 423 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 20:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 410 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 21:04
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 326 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 21:25
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 338 Thanos5150 25-Feb-17 01:25
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 425 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 21:13
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 493 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 21:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 440 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 22:07
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 366 Thanos5150 25-Feb-17 01:40
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 460 Audrey 25-Feb-17 19:54
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 602 Origyptian 25-Feb-17 21:30
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 636 Audrey 25-Feb-17 16:49
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 589 Thanos5150 25-Feb-17 18:09
I see all the stars. ;) 339 cladking 25-Feb-17 18:17
quote of the month 411 Warwick 24-Feb-17 17:41
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 379 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 03:09
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 302 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 04:26
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 406 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 05:08
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 387 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 14:53
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 360 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 22:28
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 311 Warwick 20-Feb-17 22:44
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 374 Origyptian 20-Feb-17 22:57
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 555 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 23:40
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 419 Warwick 21-Feb-17 18:47
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 419 cladking 21-Feb-17 19:56
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 387 Warwick 21-Feb-17 20:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 404 cladking 21-Feb-17 21:36
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 347 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 270 Warwick 22-Feb-17 17:37
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 330 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 18:32
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 337 Warwick 22-Feb-17 18:39
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 318 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 19:15
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 482 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 21:19
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 555 Thanos5150 23-Feb-17 22:31
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 366 Warwick 24-Feb-17 18:00
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 373 Thanos5150 24-Feb-17 19:37
Re: Equinoctial Pyramid Alignment 264 Origyptian 24-Feb-17 20:28
Angle, Orientation, time of year 393 Warwick 20-Feb-17 18:37
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 366 Thanos5150 20-Feb-17 23:14
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 269 Warwick 21-Feb-17 18:15
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 421 Thanos5150 22-Feb-17 03:07
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 438 Origyptian 22-Feb-17 05:00
Re: Angle, Orientation, time of year 409 Spiros 25-Feb-17 01:17


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.