Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> If you feel the collective discipline of
> professionals you call "Egyptologists" believe in
> "mumbo jumbo" and claim that they "can understand
> it" is "frightening",...

So it doesn't concern you in the least that Egyptologists believe these utterances are incantations which only they themselves are able to understand! These are the people in charge and they claim they can understand ancient incantation and magic! They claim that this incantation and superstitions gave them the ability to build pyramids!

And you're not concerned!

> then surely you must be
> MUCH more concerned that you
> (yourself) as a maverick, outrider, amateur with
> no credentials, with zero collaboration and no
> coherent paper or thesis with no evidence or
> support other than your "imagination"...

-snip-

> ... and also yet further that you are
> the only person on the planet presently and in the
> last 200 years with correct understanding...

At least when I say I understand them I don't also claim they are magical and incantations.

Not to put to fine a point on it but if I'm right then I might well be the only person ever to understand both modern and ancient language even if my grip of both is not very good.

> The only way anyone of the wonderful folks on GHMB
> can help you is IF you truly seek to develop an
> open objective mind and honestly sincerely address
> efforts to point out the illogical aspects of your
> vague hypothesis. Please consider! (for your own
> good)

Forgive me for latching onto a few words but "vague hypothesis"!!! I have the only hypothesis that can be nailed to a wall and that explains all the evidence; the pyramids were built by scientists who used a metaphysical language to learn how to employ CO2 geysers to lift the stones to build pyramids by pulling them straight up the side one step at a time.

If you find this "vague" compared to "they mustta used ramps... ...duh" then there's at least one more language that I don't speak.
> Perhaps as a starting point , re read what
> Origyptian stated (quoted) above over and over
> until you realise it conradicts your postion.
>
> I thought of dissecting piece by piece your insane
> post immediately prior to this, perhaps next step
> is for you to re read it (perhaps with an
> impartial friend if you have one) until you can
> see the contradictions for yourself.
>
> Once upon a time your "stinky footed bumpkin musta
> used ramps" mantra was somwhat funny.... it now
> after decade is destroying the integrity of the
> forums you infest!
>
> Lets hope you can get a little better or move in
> that direction.
>
> Cheers