Warwick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Years ago the Giza Water Pump was a spoof theory
> promulgated by a university group.
>
> I used to sarcastically refer to it as the Cistern Chapel.

But sarcastic sound bites don't make it so.

I wonder what "university group" believed it was a "spoof theory".
I wonder why they thought it was a spoof theory (or a "theory" at all).
And I wonder who that group promulgated it to as a spoof theory.



> To date no other over all scenario has been
> brought forward that comes close to being able to
> incorporate as many of the 100's of different
> unanswered questions as does the Mainstream one.

I challenge your claim to be anything other than your opinion. I see so many contradictions to the mainstream narrative so as to make it a non-starter. I hardly consider it to be the most credible possibility.

That's my opinion.



> While one can disagree with any aspect of that
> scenario, one cannot disagree that it is the
> scenario that is the most internally consistent.

One most certainly can disagree. There are indeed many contradictions to the mainstream narrative that remain unreconciled. It's just that their "self-consistent" approach neglects to consider those contradictions. From what I can tell, the mainstream narrative is largely based on presumptions inferred by an unauthenticated contextual association. One could just as easily propose conversely that the context was contrived in order to color the evidence as being consistent with the mainstream belief system rather than the other way around.